UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

 

Filed by the Registrant    ☒

 

Filed by a party other than the Registrant    ☐

 

Checkthe appropriate box:

Check the appropriate box:

 

☐  Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

 

☒  Definitive Proxy Statement

 

☐  Definitive Additional Materials

 

☐  Soliciting Material Under §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

 

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

NOT APPLICABLE

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

☒  No fee required.

 

☐  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

 

 (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

      

 

 (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

      

 

 (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

      

 

 (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

      

 

 (5)  Total fee paid:

      

 

 

☐  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

☐  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)  Amount Previously Paid:

      

 

 (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

      

 

 (3)  Filing Party:

      

 

 (4)  Date Filed:

      

 


LOGOLOGO


LOGOLOGO

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

4 Irving Place

New York, NY 10003

John McAvoy

Chairman of the Board

April 3, 20178, 2019

Dear Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Consolidated Edison, Inc. We hope that you will join the Board of Directors and the Company’s management at the Company’s Headquarters at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York, on Monday, May 15, 2017,20, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.

The accompanying Proxy Statement, provided to stockholders on or about April 3, 2017,8, 2019, contains information about matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote on the election of Directors, the ratification ofto ratify the appointment of independent accountants for 2017, the approval,2019, and to approve, on an advisory basis, of named executive officer compensation, and the frequency, on an advisory basis, of future advisory votes to approve named executive officer compensation.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible. It is very important that as many shares as possible be represented at the meeting.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOLOGO
John McAvoy


LOGOLOGO   

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

4 Irving Place, New York, NY 10003


 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

Date: 

Monday, May 15, 2017,20, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.

Location: 

Company’s Headquarters

4 Irving Place

New York, New York

Items of Business: 

a.  To elect as the members of the Board of Directors the ten nominees named in the Proxy Statement (attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference);

 

b.  To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent accountants for 2017;2019;

 

c.  To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive officer compensation; and

 

d.     To conduct an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation; and

e.  To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGOLOGO

Jeanmarie SchielerSylvia V. Dooley

Vice President and Corporate Secretary

Dated: April 3, 20178, 2019

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, MAY 15, 2017.20, 2019. THE COMPANY’S PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT, PROVIDED TO STOCKHOLDERS ON OR ABOUT APRIL 3, 2017,8, 2019, ARE AVAILABLE AT

CONEDISON.COM/SHAREHOLDERS

 

IMPORTANT!

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, we urge you to vote your shares of Company Common Stock by telephone, by Internet, or by completing and returning a proxy card or a voter instruction form, so that your shares will be represented at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting.


LOGOLOGO  TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

SUMMARY

     

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

   1 

20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

   1 

Stockholder Voting Matters

   1 

Stockholder EngagementKey Corporate Governance Practices

   3 

Board Governance Practices

3

Key Features of the Executive Compensation Program

   34 

Changes To Executive Compensation Program for 2017

3

Key Compensation Governance Practices

   4 
PROXY STATEMENT     
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGELECTION OF DIRECTORS   56 

Proposal No. 1   Election of Directors

   5

Proposal No. 2        Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Accountants

12

Proposal No. 3        Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

13

Proposal No. 4        Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation

146 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS   1513 

Meetings and Board Members’ Attendance

   1513 

Corporate Governance

   1513 

Leadership Structure

13

Risk Oversight

13

Proxy Access

   1514 

Leadership Structure

15

Risk Oversight

16

Related Person Transactions and Policy

   1614 

Board Members’ Independence

   1614 

Standing Committees of the Board

   1715 

Compensation Consultant Disclosure

   2018 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   2019 

Communications with the Board of Directors

   2019 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION   2120 

Overview

20

Elements of Compensation

   20

Stock Ownership Guidelines

21 

Long Term Incentive Plan

21

Stock Purchase Plan

21

Director Compensation Table

   22 
STOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE   23 

Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

   23 

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

   24 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   24 
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERSINDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS RATIFICATION   25 

Audit Committee Report

25

Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPProposal No.  2   Ratification of the Appointment of Independent
Accountants

   25 
COMPENSATIONAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTMATTERS   26 

Audit Committee Report

26

Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

26
ADVISORY VOTE27

Proposal No.  3   Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

27
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS   2728 

CD&A Table of Contents

   2728 

Introduction

   2728 

Executive Summary

   2728 

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

   2930 

Role of Compensation Committee and Others in Determining Executive Compensation

   3233 

Executive Compensation Actions

   3334 

Retirement and Other Benefits

   4346 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

   4548 

No Hedging Norand No Pledging

   4548 

Recoupment Policy

   4549 

Tax Deductibility of Pay

   46
COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT4749 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE   4850 
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE   5052 
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS TABLE   5153 
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE   5254 
PENSION BENEFITS   5355 

Retirement Plan Benefits

   5355 

Pension Benefits Table

   5456 
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION   5557 

Deferred Income Plan

   5557 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

   5658 
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL   5759 

Equity Acceleration

   5860 

Incremental Retirement Amounts

   5860 

Termination Without Cause or a Resignation for Good Reason

   5961 

Payments Upon Termination of Employment in Connection with a Change of Control

   5961 

Section 280G Reduction

   5961 

Death Benefit

   5961 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTINGCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT   6062 

Proxy MaterialsCOMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT

   6062 

Voting and Related MattersPAY RATIO

   61

Annual Meeting Information63

62 
CERTAIN INFORMATION AS TO INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION   63
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING64

Proxy Materials

64

Voting and Related Matters

65

Annual Meeting Information

66 
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING   6567 

ProposalProposals for Inclusion in 20182020 Proxy Statement

   6567 

Director Nominations for Inclusion in 20182020 Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)

   6567 

Other Proposals or Nominations Toto Come Before the 20182020 Annual Meeting

   6567 
OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING   6567 
 


LOGOLOGO  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

 

PROXY STATEMENTSUMMARYSTATEMENT SUMMARY

 

This section highlights the proposals to be acted upon, as well as information about Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the “Company”) that can be found in this Proxy Statement and does not contain all of the information that you need to consider. Before voting, please carefully review the complete Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders of the Company provided to stockholders on or about April 3, 2017,8, 2019, which includes the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, and other information relating to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

20172019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS (“ANNUAL MEETING”)

 

•  TimeDate and Date:Time:

 Monday, May 15, 2017,20, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.

•  Location:

 

Company Headquarters, 4 Irving Place, New York, NY 10003.

Directions are available atconedison.com/shareholders.

•  Record Date & Voting:

 

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 201725, 2019 are entitled to vote.

On the record date, 305,274,517326,946,537 shares of Company Common Stock were outstanding.

Each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.

•  Admission:

 Please follow the instructions contained in “Who“Who Can Attend theThe Annual Meeting?” and “Do“Do I Need aA Ticket toTo Attend theThe Annual Meeting?” on page 62.66.

STOCKHOLDER VOTING MATTERS

 

Management Proposals Board’s Voting
Recommendation
 Vote Required
For Approval*
 Page References
(for more detail)
Proposal No. 1. Election of Directors FOR EACH NOMINEE MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST 56 to 1112
Proposal No. 2. Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Accountants FOR MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST 1225
Proposal No. 3. Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation FOR MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST 13
Proposal No. 4.Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation

FOR

(1 YEAR)

PLURALITY OF VOTES CAST1427
* The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes (shares held by a broker or nominee that does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter and has not received voting instructions from its clients) are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting but are not considered votes cast with respect to the Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1) and the Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (Proposal No. 3) and have no effect on the vote.

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  1


LOGOLOGO  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

 

 

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors.The Board of Directors has nominated ten directors for election at the Annual Meeting and recommends the election of each of the ten nominees. The following table provides certain information about the Director nominees. (See “Information About the Director Nominees” on pages 67 to 1112 for additional information.)

 

Director Nominees      Committee Memberships
NamePrimary OccupationIndependentAudit 

Corporate
Governance
and
Name / Age /

NominatingTenure /

Independence

 Environment,Primary Occupation /
Health and
SafetyCareer Highlight
 ExecutiveCommittee
Membership
 Finance

ManagementOther
Development

andU.S.-Listed
Compensation

OperationsPublic
OversightCompany Boards

Vincent A. Calarco

Director since 2001

Non-Executive Chairman of Yale New Haven Health System

(C)

   

LOGO 

George Campbell, Jr., 73

Director since 2000

Independent

 

FormerNon-Executive

Chairman, Webb Institute

 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Executive

Management Development and
    Compensation (Chair)

Safety, Environment, Operations and
    Sustainability

1
   

   

LOGO 

(C)

Michael J. Del Giudice

Director since 1999

Founder and Senior Managing Director, Millennium Capital Markets LLC

(C)(L)

Ellen V. Futter, 69

Director since 1997

Not Independent

 President, American Museum of Natural History 

Executive

Safety, Environment, Operations and
    Sustainability(Co-Chair)

1
    

(C)

    
LOGO 

John F. Killian, 64

Director since 2007

Independent

 Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Verizon Communications Inc. 

Audit (Chair)

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Executive

Management Development and
    Compensation

 

2

    
   

LOGO 

John McAvoy, 58

Director since 2013

Not Independent

 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Consolidated Edison, Inc. Executive (Chair) 0

(C)

    
LOGO

William J. Mulrow, 63

Director since 2017

Independent

Senior Advisory Director, The Blackstone Group

Finance

Management Development and
    Compensation

Safety, Environment, Operations and
    Sustainability

1
LOGO

Armando J. Olivera, 69

Director since 2014

Independent

 Former President and Chief Executive Officer, Florida Power & Light Company 

Audit

Finance

Safety, Environment, Operations and
    Sustainability(Co-Chair)

2
    

   

LOGO 

Michael W. Ranger, 61

Director since 2008

Independent

 Senior Managing Director, Diamond Castle Holdings LLC 

Audit

Corporate Governance and Nominating
    (Chair and Lead Director)

Executive
Finance

Management Development and
    Compensation

 

1
    

   

(C)

LOGO

Linda S. Sanford, 66

Director since 2015

Independent

 Former Senior Vice President, Enterprise Transformation, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) 

Audit

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Finance

 2

    
LOGO

Deirdre Stanley, 54

Director since 2017

Independent

Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Thomson Reuters

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Safety, Environment, Operations and
    Sustainability

0
LOGO

L. Frederick Sutherland, 67

Director since 2006

Independent

 Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Former Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer, Aramark Corporation 

Audit

Finance (Chair)

Management Development and
    Compensation

 

1
    

(C)

= Member                 (C) = Chair                 (L) = Lead Director

 

 

Proposal No. 2: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Accountants.The Board recommends ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent accountants for 2017.2019. (See “Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Accountants” on page 12.25.)

 

 

Proposal No. 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation.The Board recommends the approval of, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.named executive officers. The Company’s Named Executive Officers are identified in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Analysis–Introduction” on page 27.28. (See “Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation” on page 13.)

Proposal No. 4: Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation.The Board recommends a vote, on an advisory basis, to conduct future advisory votes on Named Executive Officer compensation every year. (See “Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Named Executive Officer Compensation” on page 14.27.)

 

2 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

The Company believes that good corporate governance includes proactive stockholder engagement as well as accepting invitations to discuss matters of interest to stockholders. The Company shared with the Board the feedback it received from institutional investors and stockholders following the 2016 proxy season on issues relating to disclosure practices, corporate governance, and environmental, health and safety matters. The Company’s engagement with institutional investors resulted in the Board’s adoption of proxy access, which enables the stockholders of the Company to include their own director nominees in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy along with candidates nominated by the Board, so long as they meet certain requirements, as set forth in the Company’sBy-laws. (See “The Board of Directors – Proxy Access” on page 15 and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Summary – Stockholder Engagement and Say on Pay” on page 29 for additional information.)

BOARDKEY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

 

Election of DirectorsActive, Year-Round,Stockholder Engagement. MembersThe Company proactively engages with stockholders and accepts invitations to discuss matters of interest to them. Throughout the year, the Company discussed numerous issues with stockholders including, disclosure practices, corporate governance, political spending and lobbying practices, and environmental, health, and safety matters. The Company shares with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board the feedback it receives from institutional investors and stockholders. During the 2019 engagement season, the Company engaged with seven of Directors are elected annually by a majority of the votes cast by the Company’sour largest institutional stockholders.

Composition. The members of the Board of Directors have the combination of skills, professional experience, and diversity of backgrounds necessary to oversee the Company’s business.

 

 

Risk Oversight. The Board and its committees oversee the Company’s policies and procedures for managing risks that are identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

 

 

Strategic Planning. The Board oversees and reviews, at least annually, the Company’s strategic and business plans and objectives.

Annual Election of Directors. Each Director nominee has been recommended for election by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and approved and nominated for election by the Board. If elected, the Director nominees, all of whom are currently members of the Board, will serve for aone-year term expiring at the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Each Director will hold office until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until the Director’s earlier resignation or removal.

Voting.In uncontested elections, each Director nominee may be elected by a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election. In contested elections, each Director nominee may be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. The Company does not have a super-majority voting provision in its Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

BoardComposition. The Director nominees have the combination of skills, professional experience, and diversity necessary to oversee the Company’s business. A substantial

majority (80%) of the Director nominees are independent and have an average age of 64 years. The Board strives to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure among Directors. Of the Director nominees, 50% have been on the Board for six years or less, 30% have been on the Board for seven to sixteen years, and 20% have been on the Board for over sixteen years.

Independent Lead Director. The Board has an independent Lead Director who is the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and has numerous duties and significant responsibilities, including acting as a liaison between the independent Directors and the Company’s management, and chairing the executive sessions ofnon-management and independent Directors.

Frequent Executive Sessions. The Company’s independent Directors andnon-management Directors meet frequently in executive sessions.

Annual Board and Committee Evaluations. The Board and each of its committees annually evaluate their performance. Each committee reports the results of its self-evaluation to the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee coordinates the self-evaluation process and, following the self-evaluations, discusses with the Boardfollow-up matters as appropriate.

Membership on Public Company Boards. None of the members of the Board of Directors are not permitted to serve on more than threefour other public company boards.boards and none serve on more than two.

(See “The Board of Directors” on pages 15 to 20 for additional information.)

Proxy Access. The Board has adopted proxy access, which enables certain stockholders of the Company to include their own director nominees in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy, along with candidates nominated by the Board if the stockholders and the nominees proposed by the stockholders meet the requirements set forth in the Company’sBy-laws.

Special Meetings. Special meetings may be called by stockholders holding at least 25% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at such meeting.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement3


LOGOPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

KEY FEATURES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

Type Component Objective
Performance-Based   Compensation Annual Incentive Compensation Achievement of financial and operating objectives for which the Named Executive Officers have individual and collective responsibility.
 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Achievement, over a multi-year period, of financial and operating objectives critical to the performance of the Company’s business plans and strategies. Achievement, over a three-year period, of the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return relative to the Company’s compensation peer group companies.
Fixed & Other Compensation 

Base Salary,

Retirement Programs,

Benefits and Perquisites

 Differentiate base salary based on individual responsibility and performance. Provide retirement and other benefits that reflect the competitive practices of the industry and provide limited and specific perquisites.

(See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Analysis—Executive Summary” on pages 2728 to 2830 for additional information.)

CHANGES TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR 2017

For 2017, the Management Development and Compensation Committee approved the following changes to the annual incentive plan:

•  Overall weighting of Other Financial Performance increased from 20% to 25% and the maximum payout for the capital budget component reduced from 200% to 120%.

•  Overall weighting of the Operating Objectives reduced from 30% to 25% and the maximum payout increased from 175% to 200%.

•�� Operating Objectives modified to enhance alignment with the Company’s corporate imperatives – Employee and Public Safety, Environment and Sustainability, Operational Excellence and Customer Experience.

(See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Actions – Annual Incentive Compensation” on pages 34 to 38 for additional information.)

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement3


LOGOPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

KEY COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

Pay Practices. The Company has no employment agreements, no golden parachute excise taxgross-ups, and no individually negotiated equity awards with special treatment upon a change of control.

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The long term incentive plan: (i) prohibits the repricing of stock options or the buyout of underwater options without stockholder approval; (ii) prohibits recycling of shares for future awards except under limited circumstances; (iii) prohibits accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards, except ifunless both a change in control occurs and a participant’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and (iv) caps the maximum number of shares that may be awarded to a director, officer, or eligible employee in a calendar year.

 

Long-Term Incentive Mix. The following charts below illustrate that all Named Executive Officer long-term equity-based incentive compensation is performance-based. As describeddisclosed in proxy statements filed in 2016,2018, over half of the Company’s compensation peer group companies granted some form ofnon-performance-based incentive compensation to their named executive officers:officers.

 

LOGOLOGO

(See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation” on pages 35 to 41 and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” on pages 41 to 46 for additional information.)

LOGO4 LOGOCONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOPROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Pay Practices. The Company has no employment agreements, no golden parachute excise taxgross-ups, and no individually negotiated equity awards with special treatment upon a change of control.

 

 

Risk Management. The Company’s compensation programs include various features that have been designed to mitigate risk. (See “Compensation Risk Management” on page 62.)

 

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Company has stock ownership guidelines for directorsits Directors and certainsenior officers, including the Named Executive Officers. (See “Director Compensation—Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 21 and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis–Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 48.)

 

 

No Hedging Norand No Pledging. The Company prohibitsCompany’s Hedging and Pledging Policy and Insider Trading Policy each prohibit all Directors and officers, financial personnel, and certain

other individuals, respectively, from shorting, hedging, and pledging Company securities or holding Company securities in a margin account.account as collateral for a loan. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis–No Hedging and No Pledging” on page 48.)

 

 

Recoupment Policy. The Company’s compensation recoupment policy (commonly referred to as a “clawback policy”) applies to all officers of the Company and its subsidiaries with respect to incentive-based compensation. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis–Recoupment Policy” on page 49.)

 

 

Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation. In 2016, 92.15%2018, 93.95% of the shares voted were voted to approve the Company’s Named Executive Officernamed executive officer compensation.

 

4CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement5


LOGOLOGO  MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Ten Directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. (See “Information About the Director Nominees” on pages 67 to 11.12.) Directors are permitted to stand for election until they reach the mandatory retirement age of 75. Of the Board members standing for election, John McAvoy is the only member who is an officer of the Company. All of the nominees were elected Directors at the last Annual Meeting.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends candidates for election orre-election to the Board and reviews the qualifications of possible Director candidates. When recommending to the Board the slate of Director nominees for election at the Annual Meeting, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee strives to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure, diversity, and skills on the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also strives to ensure that the Board is composed of Directors who bring diverse viewpoints, perspectives, professional experiences and backgrounds, and effectively represent the long-term interests of stockholders. The Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believe that striking an appropriate balance between fresh perspectives and ideas and the valuable experience and familiarity contributed by longer-serving Directors is critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board. The Corporate

Governance and Nominating Committee identifies candidates through a variety of means, including professional search firms, recommendations from members of the Board, suggestions from senior management, and submissions by the Company’s managementstockholders. (See “The Board of Directors—Standing Committees of the Board—Corporate Governanceand Nominating Committee” on page 16 for additional information on the Director nomination process.)

Each nominee was selected by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and approved by the Board for submission to the Company’s stockholders. The Company believes that all of the nominees will be able and willing to serve as Directors of the Company. All of the Directors also serve as Trustees of the Company’s

subsidiary, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Edison of New York”). Mr. McAvoy also serves as Chairman of the Board of the Company’s subsidiary, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (“Orange & Rockland”).

Shares represented by every properly executed proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting for or against the election of the Director nominees as specified by the stockholder giving the proxy. If one or more of the nominees is unable or unwilling to serve, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted for any substitute nominee or nominees as may be designated by the Board.

 

 

The Board Recommends a Vote FOR Proposal No. 1.

 


Each of the ten Director nominees must receive a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, to be elected (meaning the number of shares voted “for” a Director nominee must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that Director nominee), subject to the Board’s policy regarding resignations by Directors who do not receive a majority of “for” votes. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are voted neither “for” nor “against,” and have no effect on the vote.

 


 

6CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement5


LOGOLOGO  MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Information About the Director Nominees

 

The Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consider the qualifications of Directors and Director candidates individually and in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition and the Company’s current and future needs. The Board believes that the Board, as a whole, should possess a combination of skills, professional experience, and diversity of backgrounds necessary to oversee the Company’s business. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist it in exercising its responsibilities to the Company and its stockholders. In evaluating Director candidates and considering incumbent Directors for renomination to the Board, the Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consider various factors. Pursuant to the Guidelines, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews with the Board the skills and characteristics of Director nominees, including independence, integrity, judgment, business

experience, areas of expertise, availability for service, factors relating to the composition of the Board (including its size and structure), and the Company’s principles of diversity.diversity, and the skills and characteristics of Director

nominees, including independence, integrity, judgment, business experience, areas of expertise, and availability for service to assure that the Board contains an appropriate mix of Directors to best further the Company’s long-term business interests. For incumbent Directors, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also considers past performance of the Director on the Board.

The current Director nominees bring to the Company the benefit of their qualifications, leadership, skills, and the diversity of their experience and backgrounds which provide the Board, as a whole, with the skills and expertise that reflect the needs of the Company. See pages 68 to 1112 for information about each Director nominee, including their age as of the date of the Annual Meeting, business experience, period of service as a Director, public or investment company directorships, and other directorships.

 

 

The demographic makeup of the Director nominees is set forth in the pie charts below:

The following graph displays information about the skills and experience of the Director nominees:

6

LOGO

 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement

LOGO

LOGO


LOGOCONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING7


LOGOLOGO  

Vincent A. Calarco

Director since: 2001

Age: 74

Board Committees:

•  Audit (Chair)

•  Corporate Governance and

    Nominating

•  Executive

•  Management Development and

    Compensation

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Career Highlights: Mr. Calarco has been theNon-Executive Chairman of Yale New Haven Health System since October 2016. Mr. Calarco was theNon-Executive Chairman of Newmont Mining Corporation, Denver, CO, a gold production company, from January 2008 to April 2016. From April 1985 to July 2004, Mr. Calarco was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Crompton Corporation (now known as Chemtura Corporation). Chemtura is a global specialty chemicals company, headquartered in Philadelphia, PA. Mr. Calarco also held various management and executive positions at Uniroyal Chemical Company.

Other Directorships: Mr. Calarco is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York and a Director of Newmont Mining Corporation. During the past five years, Mr. Calarco also served as a Director of CPG International, Inc. through October 2013. Mr. Calarco is also the President and a Trustee of the Hopkins School, and a Director or Trustee of Swanson Industries, Yale New Haven Health System andYale-New Haven Hospital.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Calarco has experience leading public companies, and has management and executive experience with manufacturing companies. Mr. Calarco’s experience from his leadership positions and financial oversight experience in senior management roles at Newmont Mining Corporation and Crompton Corporation and his service on other boards support the Board in its oversight of the Company’s management, financial, operations, and strategic planning activities.

LOGO 

George Campbell, Jr., Ph.D.

 

Director since: 2000

 

Age: 7173

 

Board Committees:

•  Corporate Governance and

   Nominating

•  Executive

•  Management Development and

   Compensation (Chair)

•  Safety, Environment, Operations Oversightand

   Sustainability

Career Highlights:Highlights: Dr. Campbell, a physicist, was theNon-Executive Chairman of the Webb Institute, Glen Cove, NY, an all scholarship college offering degrees exclusively in naval architecture and marine engineering, from November 2012 to October 2016. Dr. Campbell was the President of The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York, NY, a college focusing primarily onproviding degrees in engineering, architecture, and art,fine arts, from July 2000 to June 2011. Dr. Campbell also held various research and development and management positions at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Dr. Campbell also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of NACME, Inc., anon-profit corporation focused on engineering education and science and technology policy.

Other Directorships:Directorships: Dr. Campbell is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York and a Director of Barnes and Noble, Inc. Dr. Campbell is also a Director or Trustee of the Josiah Macy Foundation, The Mitre Corporation, Montefiore Medical Center(Emeritus), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Institute of International Education, Inc., the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation and the Webb Institute.

Attributes and Skills:Skills: Dr. Campbell has experience leading premiere colleges and anon-profit corporation, with a focus on engineering and science. Dr. Campbell also has experience in management and research and development at a public company. Dr. Campbell’s experience from his leadership positions at the Webb Institute, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, AT&T Bell Laboratories, and NACME, Inc., and his service on other boards support the Board in its oversight of the Company’s operations and management activities.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement7


LOGOMATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

LOGO

 

LOGO

Michael J. Del Giudice

Director since: 1999

Age: 74

Board Committees:

•  Audit

•  Corporate Governance and

    Nominating (Chair & Lead Director)

•  Executive

•  Management Development and

    Compensation

Career Highlights: Mr. Del Giudice is the founder and Senior Managing Director of Millennium Capital Markets LLC, New York, NY, an investment banking firm since 1996, and Chairman of Carnegie Hudson Resources, LLC, a private equity firm. Mr. Del Giudice was a General Partner at the investment bank of Lazard Frères & Co., and served as Chief of Staff to New York State Governor Mario Cuomo, Director of State Operations to New York State Governor Hugh Carey, and Chief of Staff to the New York State Assembly Speaker Stanley Steingut.

Other Directorships: Mr. Del Giudice is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York and a Director of Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc. During the past five years, Mr. Del Giudice also served as a Director of Reis, Inc. through September 2013. Mr. Del Giudice also served as Lead Director of Barnes and Noble, Inc. through September 2010. Mr. Del Giudice is Acting Chair of the New York Racing Association, and a Director of Bloomfield Industries, Corinthian Capital Group, and Universal Marine Medical Supply International LLC.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Del Giudice has experience in private equity, with a focus on the power and energy infrastructure market, as well as experience in government service. Mr. Del Giudice’s experience from his investment activities and his government service support the Board in its oversight of the Company’s corporate governance, financial, and strategic planning activities, and the Company’s relationships with stakeholders.

LOGO 

Ellen V. Futter

 

Director since: 1997

 

Age: 6769

 

Board Committees:

•  Environment, Health and Safety

    (Chair)Executive

•  Safety, Environment, Operations Oversightand

   Sustainability(Co-Chair)

Career Highlights:Highlights: Ms. Futter has been the President of the American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, since November 1993. Previously, Ms. Futter served as the President of Barnard College, New York, NY and as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and was a corporate attorney at the law firm of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy.

Other Directorships:Directorships: Ms. Futter is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York. During the past five years,York and a Director of Evercore Inc. Ms. Futter also served as a Director and Chairman of JPMorgan Chase & Co., Inc. through July 2013.the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Ms. Futter is also a Director or Trustee of NYC & Company and the Brookings Institution and a Manager at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Attributes and Skills:Skills: Ms. Futter has management and operations experience leading major New Yorknot-for-profit entities that provide services to the public. Ms. Futter also has legal and financial experience. Ms. Futter’s experience from her leadership positions at the American Museum of Natural History and Barnard College and her legal experience support the Board in its oversight of the Company’s operations, planning and regulatory activities and the Company’s relationships with stakeholders.

 

 

8 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO  

John F. Killian

 

Director since: 2007

 

Age: 6264

 

Board Committees:

•  Audit (Chair)

•  Corporate Governance and

   Nominating

•  Executive

•  Management Development and

   Compensation

Career Highlights: Mr. Killian was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Verizon Communications Inc., a telecommunications company, from March 2009 to DecemberNovember 2010. Mr. Killian was the President of Verizon Business, Basking Ridge, NJ from October 2005 until February 2009, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Verizon Telecom from June 2003 until October 2005, and the Senior Vice President and Controller of Verizon TelecomCorporation from April 2002 until June 2003. Mr. Killian also served in executive positions at Bell Atlantic and was the President and Chief Executive Officer of NYNEX CableComms Limited.

Other Directorships: Mr. Killian is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York and Goldman Sachs Trust II and a Director of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company. Mr. Killian is also served as a Trustee and Chairman of the Board of Providence College.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Killian has leadership experience at regulated consumer services companies, including experience with financial reporting and internal auditing. Mr. Killian’s experience from his leadership positions at Verizon Communications, Inc., Bell Atlantic and NYNEX CableComms Limited supports the Board in its oversight of the Company’s auditing, financial, operating, and strategic planning activities, and the Company’s relationships with stakeholders.

LOGO

  

John McAvoy

 

Director since: 2013

 

Age: 5658

 

Board Committee:

•  Executive (Chair)

Career Highlights: Mr. McAvoy has been Chairman of the Board of the Company and Con Edison of New York since May 2014. Mr. McAvoy has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of Con Edison of New York since December 2013. Mr. McAvoy was President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange &and Rockland Utilities, Inc. from January 2013 to December 2013. Mr. McAvoy was Senior Vice President of Central Operations for Con Edison of New York from February 2009 to December 2012. Mr. McAvoy joined Con Edison of New York in 1980.

Other Directorships: Mr. McAvoy is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York. Mr. McAvoy is also a Director or Trustee of the American Gas Association, the Edison Electric Institute, the Intrepid Sea, Air and& Space Museum, the Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York City, the Partnership for New York City, Manhattan College, and the Electric Power Research Institute. Mr. McAvoy also served as a Director of the Business Council of New York State, Inc., and New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, and the Partnership for New York City.Authority. Mr. McAvoy is also Chair of the Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center Members Executive Committee and Orange & Rockland.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. McAvoy has leadership, engineering, financial, and operations experience, as well as knowledge of the utility industry and the Company’s business. Mr. McAvoy’s experience from his leadership positions at the Company, and his service on other boards, supports the Board in its oversight of the Company’s management, financial, operations, and strategic planning activities, and the Company’s relationships with stakeholders.

 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  9


LOGOLOGO  MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

William J. Mulrow

Director since: 2017

Age: 63

Board Committees:

•  Finance

•  Management Development and

   Compensation

•  Safety, Environment, Operations and

   Sustainability

Career Highlights: Mr. Mulrow is a Senior Advisory Director since May 2017 at The Blackstone Group, the world’s largest alternative asset management firm. Previously, he served as Secretary to New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo from January 2015 to April 2017, and was a Senior Managing Director at Blackstone from April 2011 to January 2015. From 2005 to 2011, he was a Director of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Mr. Mulrow also held various management positions at Paladin Capital Group, Gabelli Asset Management, Inc., Rothschild Inc., and Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation. In addition, Mr. Mulrow served in a number of other government positions including Chairman of the New York State Housing Finance Agency and State of New York Mortgage Agency.

Other Directorships: Mr. Mulrow is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York, and a Director of JBG Smith Properties since July 2017, and Titan Mining Corporation since 2018. Mr. Mulrow also served as a Director of Arizona Mining, Inc.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Mulrow has business and leadership experience in both the public and the private sector. He also has financial, accounting and asset management experience from his leadership positions at Blackstone, New York State government, and his service on other boards which supports the Board in its oversight of the Company’s financial and strategic planning activities.

LOGO

  

Armando J. Olivera

 

Director since: 2014

 

Age: 6769

 

Board Committees:

•  Environment, Health and SafetyAudit

•  Finance

•  Safety, Environment, Operations Oversight

   and Sustainability(Co-Chair)

Career Highlights: Mr. Olivera was President of Florida Power & Light Company, an electric utility that is a subsidiary of a publicly traded energy company, from June 2003, and Chief Executive Officer from July 2008, until his retirement in May 2012. Mr. Olivera joined Florida Power & Light Company in 1972. Mr. Olivera also served as Chairman of the Boards of twonon-profits: Florida Reliability Coordinating Council that focuses on the reliability and adequacy of bulk electricity in Florida, and Southeastern Electric Exchange that focuses on coordinating storm restoration services and enhancing operational and technical resources. Mr. Olivera is also a consultant to the Ridge Lane Sustainability Practice since 2018.

Other Directorships: Mr. Olivera is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York. Mr. Olivera also serves as a Director of Fluor Corporation and Lennar Corporation. During the past five years, Mr. Olivera served as a Director of AGL Resources, Inc. until July 2016, and as2016. Mr. Olivera was also a Director of Florida Power & Light Company until May 2012.and a Trustee and Vice Chair of Miami Dade College. Mr. Olivera is also a Trustee Emeritus of Cornell University and Miami Dade College.University.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Olivera has leadership, engineering, and operations experience, as well as knowledge of the utility industry. Mr. Olivera’s experience from his leadership positions at Florida Power & Light Company, and his service on other boards, supports the Board in its oversight of the Company’s management, financial, operations, and strategic planning activities. Mr. Olivera’s experiences as a consultant on sustainability supports the Board in its oversight of sustainability matters.

10CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

  

Michael W. Ranger

 

Director since: 2008

 

Age: 5961

 

Board Committees:

•  Audit

•  Corporate Governance and

   Nominating (Chair and Lead Director)

•  Executive

•  Finance

•  Operations Oversight (Chair)Management Development and

   Compensation

Career Highlights: Mr. Ranger has been Senior Managing Director of Diamond Castle Holdings LLC, New York, NY, a private equity investment firm, since 2004 andNon-Executive Chairman of KDC Solar LLC since 2010. Mr. Ranger was an investment banker in the energy and power sector for twenty years, including at Credit Suisse First Boston, Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette, DLJ Global Energy Partners, and Drexel Burnham Lambert. Mr. Ranger was also a member of the Utility Banking Group at Bankers Trust.

Other Directorships: Mr. Ranger is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York and a Director of Covanta Holding Corporation. Mr. Ranger is also Chairman of the Board of Trustees and a Trustee of St. Lawrence University and a Director orof KDC Solar LLC. Mr. Ranger also served as a Trustee of Morristown-Beard School through 2017 and Director of Bonten Media Group KDC Solar LLC, Morristown-Beard School,Inc. through 2017 and Professional Direction Enterprise,Directional Enterprises, Inc., and St. Lawrence University. through 2018.

Attributes and Skills: Mr. Ranger has investment experience focusing on the energy and power sector, investment banking experience in the energy and power sector, and experience as a member of a utility banking group. Mr. Ranger’s experience from his investment activities in the energy and power sector and his service on other boards supports the Board in its oversight of the Company’s corporate governance and financial and strategic planning activities.

10CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOMATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

LOGO

  

Linda S. Sanford

 

Director since: 2015

 

Age: 6466

 

Board Committees:

•  Audit

•  Corporate Governance and

   Nominating

•  Environment, Health and SafetyFinance

•  Finance

Career Highlights: Ms. Sanford was Senior Vice President Enterprise Transformation, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), a multinational technology and consulting corporation, from January 2003 to December 2014. Ms. Sanford joined IBM in 1975. Ms. Sanford was also a consultant to The Carlyle Group serving as an Operating Executive from 2015 to July 2018.

Other Directorships: Ms. Sanford is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York and a Director of Pitney Bowes Inc., RELX NV (formerly Reed Elsevier NV) and RELX PLC (formerly Reed Elsevier PLC). During the past five years, Ms. Sanford also served as a Director of ITT Corporation through May 2013.Corporation. Ms. Sanford is also a Director or Trustee of ION Group and New York Hall of Science. Ms. Sanford also serves as a Trustee Emeriti of St. John’s University and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Ms. Sanford also served as a Director or Trustee of the Partnership for New York City through January 2015, the State University of New York through May 2015 and the Business Council of New York State through May 2015.

Attributes and Skills: Ms. Sanford has leadership experience at an international technology company, including experience with information technology, cybersecurity, manufacturing, customer relations, and corporate planning.planning and transformation. Ms. Sanford’s experience from her leadership positions at IBM and her service on other boards supports the Board in its oversight of technology, relationship with stakeholders, and financial and strategic planning activities.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement11


LOGOELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

Deirdre Stanley

Director since: 2017

Age: 54

Board Committees:

•  Corporate Governance and
   Nominating

•  Safety, Environment, Operations and    Sustainability

Career Highlights: Ms. Stanley has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel to Thomson Reuters, a leading source of news and information for professional markets, since 2008 where she also currently serves as Corporate Secretary to the Board of Directors, chairs the Disclosure Committee, and oversees the company’s enterprise risk management process and reporting. Ms. Stanley was Senior Vice President and General Counsel to The Thomson Corporation from 2002 to 2008, when it combined with Reuters PLC to form Thomson Reuters. Prior to 2002, Ms. Stanley held various legal and senior executive positions at InterActive Corporation (previously USA Networks, Inc.) and GTE Corporation (a predecessor company to Verizon). She was also an attorney with the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

Other Directorships: Ms. Stanley is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York. Ms. Stanley is also a Trustee of the Hospital for Special Surgery and a Director of The Dalton School and Refinitiv.

Attributes and Skills: Ms. Stanley has leadership, legal and operations experience at an international news and information company, including experience with mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and risk management. Ms. Stanley’s experience from her leadership positions at Thomson Reuters and InterActive Corporation, her legal experience and service on other boards support the Board in its oversight of the Company’s operations, risk management, strategic planning, and relationships with stakeholders.

LOGO

 

L. Frederick Sutherland

 

Director since: 2006

 

Age: 6567

 

Board Committees:

•  Audit

•  Finance (Chair)

•  Management Development and

   Compensation

Career Highlights:Highlights: Mr. Sutherland was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Aramark Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, a provider of food services, facilities management and uniform and career apparel, from 1997 through April 2015 and the Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer from April 2015 to December 2015. Prior to joining Aramark in 1980, Mr. Sutherland was Vice President, in the Corporate Banking, Department ofat Chase Manhattan Bank, New York, NY.

Other Directorships:Directorships: Mr. Sutherland is a Trustee of Con Edison of New York and a Director of Colliers International Group Inc. Mr. Sutherland is also a Director or Trustee of People’s Light and Theater and Sterling Talent Solutions. Mr.Solutions.Mr. Sutherland is also Chairman of the Board of WHYY, Philadelphia’s public broadcast affiliate, Board President of Episcopal Community Services, a PBS affiliate.Philadelphia-based anti-poverty agency, a Trustee of Duke University, and a Trustee of Peoples Light, anon-profit theater.

Attributes and Skills:Skills: Mr. Sutherland has leadership experience at an international managed services company, including experience with financial reporting, internal auditing, mergers and acquisitions, financing, risk management, corporate compliance, and corporate planning. Mr. Sutherland also has corporate banking experience. Mr. Sutherland’s experience from his leadership positions at Aramark Corporation and Chase Manhattan Bank supports the Board in its oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, auditing, and strategic planning activities.

 

 

12CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MEETINGS AND BOARD MEMBERS’ ATTENDANCE

During 2018, the Board consisted of the following members: Vincent A. Calarco (until his retirement from the Board on May 21, 2018), George Campbell, Jr., Michael J. Del Giudice (until his retirement from the Board on January 18, 2018), Ellen V. Futter, John F. Killian, John McAvoy, William J. Mulrow, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, Linda S. Sanford, Deirdre Stanley, and L. Frederick Sutherland. The Board of Directors held 11 meetings in 2018. At its meetings, the Board considers a wide variety of matters involving such things as the Company’s strategic planning, its financial condition and results of operations, its capital and operating budgets, personnel matters, succession planning, risk management, industry issues, accounting practices and disclosure, and corporate governance practices.

In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (Mr. Ranger) serves as independent Lead Director and, as such, chairs the executive sessions of thenon-management Directors and the independent Directors. The Board routinely holds executive sessions at which onlynon-management Directors are present, and the independent Directors meet in executive session at least once a year. The Company’s independent Directors met three times in executive session and thenon-management Directors met eight times in executive session during 2018.

During 2018, each current member of the Board attended more than 75% of the combined meetings of the Board of Directors and the Board Committees on which he or she served held during the period that he or she served. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All of the Directors who then served on the Board attended the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company’s corporate governance documents, including its Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Management Development and Compensation Committees, and the Standards of Business Conduct, are available on the Company’s website atconedison.com/shareholders.The Standards of Business Conduct apply to all Directors, officers and employees. The Company intends to post on its website atconedison.com/shareholders amendments to its Standards

of Business Conduct and a description of any waiver from a provision of the Standards of Business Conduct granted by the Board to any Director or executive officer of the Company within four business days after such amendment or waiver. To date, there have been no such waivers.

LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board consists of a substantial majority of independent Directors. (See “The Board of Directors—Board Members’ Independence” on pages 14 to 15.) As discussed in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board selects the Company’s chief executive officer and chairman of the Board in the manner that it determines to be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s leadership structure combines the roles of the chairman and chief executive officer. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company due to a variety of factors, including Mr. McAvoy’s long-standing knowledge of the Company and the utility industry, and his extensive engineering, financial, and operations experience.

The Board has an independent Lead Director who is the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Lead Director: (i) acts as a liaison between the independent Directors and the Company’s management; (ii) chairs the executive sessions ofnon-management and independent Directors and has the authority to call additional executive sessions as appropriate; (iii) chairs Board meetings in the Chairman’s absence; (iv) coordinates with the Chairman on agendas and schedules for Board meetings, information flow to the Board, and other matters pertinent to the Company and the Board; and (v) is available for consultation and communication with major stockholders as appropriate.

Pursuant to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has oversight responsibility for reviewing the Company’s strategic plans, objectives and risks. Each of the standing committees of the Board, other than the Executive Committee, is chaired bynon-management Directors. (See “The Board of Directors—Standing Committees of the Board” on pages 15 to 18).

RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board’s primary function is one of oversight. In connection with its oversight function, the Board oversees the Company’s

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.Proxy Statement  1113


LOGOLOGO  MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGBOARD OF DIRECTORS

policies and procedures for managing risk. The Board administers its risk oversight function primarily through its Committees that report to the Board.

Board Committees have assumed oversight of various risks that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies and reports to the Board on the Company’s risk management program. Management regularly provides reports to the Board and its Committees concerning risks identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. Cybersecurity has been identified as a key enterprise risk for the Company. An annual presentation on cybersecurity risks continues to be provided to the Board and the Audit Committee has commenced reviewing morein-depth cybersecurity matters on a semi-annual basis. In addition, the Board receives regular updates as to cybersecurity risks from management.

PROXY ACCESS

The Company developed and implemented a proxy access framework that allows a stockholder or a group of up to 20 stockholders who have owned at least three percent (3%) of the outstanding shares of the Company for at least three years to submit nominees for up to twenty percent (20%) of the Board, or two nominees, whichever is greater, for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy, subject to complying with the requirements identified in the Company’sBy-laws.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS AND POLICY

The Company has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions between the Company and its Directors, Director nominees, executive officers, greater-than-five-percent (5%) beneficial owners, and their respective immediate family members, where the amount involved in the transaction since the beginning of the Company’s last completed fiscal year exceeds or is expected to exceed $100,000.

The policy provides that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee review certain transactions subject to the policy and determine whether or not to approve or ratify those transactions. In doing so, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s

interest in the transaction. In addition, the Board has delegated authority to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee topre-approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $1.0 million. A summary of any new transactionspre-approved by the Chair is provided to the full Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for its review in connection with a regularly scheduled committee meeting.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has considered and adopted standingpre-approvals under the policy for limited transactions with related persons.Pre-approved transactions include:

 

(i)business transactions with other companies at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), if the amount of business falls below the thresholds in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards and the Company’s Director independence standards; and

(ii)contributions tonon-profit organizations at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) if the aggregate amount involved is less than both $1.0 million and two percent (2%) of the organization’s consolidated gross annual revenues.

In 2018, Ellen V. Futter’s brother received approximately $135,200 for providing legal services to Con Edison of New York and is providing legal services in 2019. The provision of these services by Ms. Futter’s brother was approved by the Committee.

BOARD MEMBERS’ INDEPENDENCE

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board of Directors consist of a substantial majority of Directors who meet the New York Stock Exchange definition of independence, as determined by the Board in accordance with the standards described in the Guidelines below. The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following Directors are “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards: George Campbell, Jr., John F. Killian, William J. Mulrow, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, Linda S. Sanford, Deirdre Stanley, and L. Frederick Sutherland. The Board monitors the independence of its members on an ongoing basis using standards set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

To assist it in making determinations of Director independence, the Board has adopted independence standards, which are set forth in its Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on the Company’s website atconedison.com/shareholders. Under these standards, the

14CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Board has determined that each of the following relationships is categorically immaterial and therefore, by itself, does not preclude a Director from being independent:

(i)(a) the Director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of the Company’s internal or external auditor, but the immediate family member does not personally work on the Company’s audit; or (b) the Director or an immediate family member was, within the last three years, a partner or employee of such a firm but no longer works at the firm and did not personally work on the Company’s audit within that time;

(ii)the Director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed at another company where any of the Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee, but the Director or the Director’s immediate family member is not an executive officer of the other company and his or her compensation is not determined or reviewed by that company’s compensation committee;

(iii)the Director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in any of the last three fiscal years, but the total payments in each year were less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%) of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater;

(iv)the Director is a partner or the owner of five percent (5%) or more of the voting stock of another company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in any of the last three fiscal years, but the total payments in each year were less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%) of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater;

(v)the Director is a partner, the owner of five percent (5%) or more of the voting stock or an executive officer of another company which is indebted to the Company, or to which the Company is indebted, but the total amount of the indebtedness in each of the last three fiscal years was less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%) of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater; and

(vi)the Director or an immediate family member is a director or an executive officer of anon-profit organization to which the Company has made contributions in any of the last three fiscal years, but the Company’s total
contributions to the organization in each year were less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%) of such organization’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater.

STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee, currently John F. Killian (Chair), Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, Linda S. Sanford, and L. Frederick Sutherland, is composed of five independent Directors. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment of the independent accountants for the Company, subject to stockholder ratification at the Annual Meeting. The Audit Committee has appointed PwC as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year 2019. If the appointment of PwC is not ratified, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration in the future selection of independent accountants.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent accountants for the Company. The Audit Committee reviews the proposed auditing andnon-audit fees and approves in advance the proposed auditing andnon-audit services associated with the Company’s retention of the independent accountants. Every five years, the Audit Committee evaluates whether it is appropriate to rotate the Company’s independent accountants and, in conjunction with mandatory rotation of the lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee is directly involved in selecting the lead engagement partner of the independent accountants. The Audit Committee meets with the Company’s management, including Con Edison of New York’s General Auditor, the General Counsel, and the Company’s independent accountants, several times a year to discuss internal controls and accounting matters, the Company’s financial statements, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, earnings press releases and the scope and results of the auditing programs of the independent accountants and of Con Edison of New York’s internal auditing department. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies, and the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards and Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors of the Company has determined that each

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement15


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

of John F. Killian, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland is an “audit committee financial expert” as the term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Audit Committee held six meetings in 2018.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, currently Michael W. Ranger, Chair, George Campbell, Jr., John F. Killian, Linda S. Sanford, and Deirdre Stanley, is composed of five independent Directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee annually evaluates each Director’s individual performance when considering whether to nominate the Director forre-election to the Board and is responsible for recommending candidates to fill vacancies on the Board. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assists with respect to the composition and size of the Board and of all Committees of the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also makes recommendations to the Board as to the compensation of Board members, as well as other corporate governance matters, including Board independence criteria and determinations and corporate governance guidelines. Additionally, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

Among its duties, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the skills and characteristics of Director candidates, including their independence, integrity, judgment, business experience, areas of expertise and availability for service, factors relating to the composition of the Board (including its size and structure) and the Company’s principles of diversity.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority under its charter to hire advisors to assist it in its decisions. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies director candidates through a variety of means, including professional search firms, recommendations from members of the Board, suggestions from senior management, and submissions by the Company’s stockholders. When using a professional search firm, the firm assists in developing criteria for potential Board members to complement the Board’s existing strengths. Based on such criteria, the firm also provides, for review and consideration, lists of potential candidates with background information. After consulting with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the firm further screens and interviews candidates as directed to determine their qualifications, interest and any

potential conflicts of interest and provides its results to the Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also considers candidates recommended by stockholders. There are no differences in the manner in which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders versus those recommended through other means. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will make an initial determination as to whether a particular candidate meets the Company’s criteria for Board membership, and will then further consider candidates that do. Stockholder recommendations for candidates, accompanied by biographical material for evaluation, may be sent to the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company. Each recommendation should include information as to the qualifications of the candidate and should be accompanied by a written statement (presented to the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company) from the suggested candidate to the effect that the candidate is willing to serve.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has also retained Mercer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to provide information, analyses, and objective advice regarding director compensation. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee directs Mercer to: (i) assist it by providing competitive market information on the design of the director compensation program; (ii) advise it on the design of the director compensation program and also provide advice on the administration of the program; and (iii) brief it on director compensation trends among the Company’s compensation peer group and broader industry. The Board members, including the chief executive officer, consider the recommendations of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The decisions may reflect factors and considerations in addition to the information and advice provided by Mercer. All of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held four meetings in 2018.

Environment, Health and Safety Committee

Effective December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors dissolved the Environment, Health and Safety Committee as a standing committee of the Board. The duties and responsibilities of the Environment, Health and Safety Committee were merged with the duties and responsibilities of the Operations Oversight Committee and a new standing committee was formed effective January 1, 2019–the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee. The Environment, Health and

16CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Safety Committee provided advice and counsel to the Company’s management on corporate environment, health and safety policies and on such other environment, health, safety, and sustainability matters as it from time to time deemed appropriate.

The Environment, Health and Safety Committee also reviewed significant issues identified by management relating to the Company’s environment, health, and safety programs and its compliance with environment, health, and safety laws and regulations, and made such other reviews and recommended to the Board such other actions as it deemed necessary or desirable to help promote sound planning by the Company with due regard to the protection of the environment, health, and safety. Additionally, the Environment, Health and Safety Committee oversaw the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that were identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. Immediately prior to its dissolution, the Environment, Health and Safety Committee was composed of fournon-management Directors–Ellen V. Futter, Chair, William J. Mulrow, Linda S. Sanford, and Deirdre Stanley. The Environment, Health and Safety Committee held four meetings in 2018.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee, currently John McAvoy, Chair, and four Directors (three of whom are independent), George Campbell, Jr., Ellen V. Futter, John F. Killian, and Michael W. Ranger, may exercise, during intervals between the meetings of the Board, all the powers vested in the Board, except for certain specified matters. No meetings of the Executive Committee were held in 2018.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee, currently L. Frederick Sutherland, Chair, William J. Mulrow, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, and Linda S. Sanford, is composed of five independent Directors. The Finance Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s financial condition and policies, capital and operating budgets, financial forecasts, major contracts and real estate transactions, financings, investments, bank credit arrangements, its dividend policy, strategic business plan, litigation, and other financial matters. Additionally, the Finance Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks, relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Finance Committee held nine meetings in 2018.

Management Development and Compensation Committee

The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), currently George Campbell, Jr., Chair, John F. Killian, William J. Mulrow, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland, is composed of five independent Directors. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board relating to officer and senior management appointments. The Compensation Committee also establishes and oversees the Company’s executive compensation and welfare benefit plans and policies, administers its equity plans and annual incentive plan and reviews and approves annually compensation relating to the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s executive compensation program, with the exception of the salary of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange & Rockland which is approved by the Board of Directors of Orange & Rockland. Additionally, the Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks, relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

The Compensation Committee has the authority, under its charter, to engage the services of outside advisors, experts, and others to assist it. The Compensation Committee engages Mercer to provide information, analyses, and objective advice regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee directs Mercer to: (i) assist it in the development and assessment of the compensation peer group for the purposes of providing competitive market information for the design of the executive compensation program; (ii) compare the Company’s chief executive officer’s base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation to that of the chief executive officers of the identified compensation peer group and broader industry; (iii) advise it on the officers’ base salaries and target award levels within the annual and long-term incentive plans; (iv) advise it on the design of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive plans and on the administration of the plans; (v) brief it on executive compensation trends among the Company’s compensation peer group and broader industry; and (vi) assist with the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2018 and Mercer attended three meetings.

For a discussion of the role of the Compensation Committee and information about the Company’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 28.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement17


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

In addition, the Compensation Committee also reviews and makes recommendations as necessary to provide for orderly succession and transition in the senior management of the Company and receives reports and makes recommendations with respect to minority and female recruitment, employment and promotion.

The Compensation Committee also oversees and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), and reviews and makes recommendations with respect to benefit plans and plan amendments, the selection of plan trustees and the funding policy and contributions to the funded plans, and reviews the performance of the funded plans.

Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is “independent,” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards under Rule10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and meets the “outside director” criteria of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the“Non-Employee” Director criteria of Rule16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Operations Oversight Committee

Effective December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors dissolved the Operations Oversight Committee as a standing committee of the Board. The duties and responsibilities of the Operations Oversight Committee were merged with the duties and responsibilities of the Environment, Health and Safety Committee and a new standing committee was formed effective January 1, 2019–the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee. The Operations Oversight Committee oversaw the Company’s efforts relating to the Company’s operating systems and their impact on the customer. The Operations Oversight Committee also reviewed significant issues identified by the Company relating to the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems and their impact on the customer. The Operations Oversight Committee also reviewed the compliance of the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems with laws and regulations and the Company’s corporate policies and procedures, as it deemed necessary or appropriate. Additionally, the Operations Oversight Committee oversaw the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that were identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. Immediately prior to its dissolution, the Operations Oversight Committee was composed of fournon-management Directors–Armando J. Olivera, Chair, George Campbell,

Jr., Ellen V. Futter, and Deirdre Stanley. The Operations Oversight Committee held four meetings in 2018.

Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee

Effective January 1, 2019, the Board of Directors established the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee as a standing committee of the Board. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee, currently Ellen V. Futter,Co-Chair, Armando J. Olivera,Co-Chair, George Campbell, Jr., William J. Mulrow, and Deirdre Stanley, is composed of fivenon-management Directors. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee oversees the Company’s efforts relating to corporate responsibility and sustainability, which includes operating in a safe, environmentally sensitive and socially responsible manner, guarding the health and safety of Company employees and the public, supporting the development and success of Company employees, delivering value to customers and fostering growth to meet the expectations of investors. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee reviews significant issues identified by the Company relating to: (i) the Company’s subsidiaries’ environment, health, and safety programs and their compliance with environment, health, and safety laws and regulations, and the Company’s corporate environment, health, and safety policies and procedures, as may be necessary or appropriate; (ii) the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems, the operating systems’ impact on the customer, and the operating systems’ compliance with laws and regulations and the Company’s corporate policies and procedures, as may be necessary or appropriate; and (iii) the Company’s subsidiaries’ sustainability priorities, initiatives, and strategies. Additionally, the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

COMPENSATION CONSULTANT DISCLOSURE

The Compensation Committee has retained Mercer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to assist with its responsibilities related to the Company’s executive compensation programs and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has retained Mercer to assist with its responsibilities related to the director compensation program, including the design and structure of the Company’s long term incentive plan. Mercer’s fees for

18CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

executive and director compensation consulting to the committees in 2018 were approximately $510,340.

During 2018, the Company retained Marsh & McLennan affiliates (other than Mercer) to provide services, unrelated to executive compensation. These services were approved by the Company’s management. The aggregate fees paid for these other services, which include auction services, compensation planning surveys, and employee benefit guides, were approximately $45,050.

The Compensation Committee considered the independence of Mercer under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Compensation Committee concluded that the services provided by the Marsh & McLennan affiliates (other than Mercer) did not raise any conflicts of interest and did not impair Mercer’s ability to provide independent advice to the Compensation Committee concerning executive or director compensation matters.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

George Campbell, Jr. (Chair), John F. Killian, William J. Mulrow, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland were on the Company’s Compensation Committee during 2018. The Company believes that there are no interlocks with the members of the Compensation Committee.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Interested parties may communicate directly with the members of the Company’s Board of Directors, including thenon-management Directors as a group, by writing to them, care of the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Secretary, at the Company’s principal executive office at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003. The Vice President and Corporate Secretary will forward communications to the Director or the Directors indicated.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement19


LOGODIRECTOR COMPENSATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

OVERVIEW

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews director compensationbi-annually. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers information, analyses, and objective advice regarding director compensation provided by Mercer. Director compensation is assessed relative to the Company’s compensation peer group (the same group used to evaluate executive compensation), general industry trends, and the total cost of governance. The Board reviews the recommendations of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee when determining whether changes, if any, will be made.

In February 2018, as part of its review of Director compensation, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requested that Mercer conduct anin-depth analysis of each element of compensation and the compensation program structure relative to the compensation peer group. Mercer’s review found that Committee member meeting fees were on the decline for the assessment group as companies focused more on compensating Directors for their expertise than their time. Following the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, effective April 1, 2018, the Board approved the elimination of Committee member meeting fees and an increase to the stock ownership guidelines. Certain retainers and the value of the annual equity award were increased to replace the Committee member meeting fees.

In November 2018, the Board dissolved two committees effective December 31, 2018 and established a new committee effective January 1, 2019. In connection with these committee changes, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requested that Mercer conduct a second, limited analysis of committee chair retainers relative to the compensation peer group. Mercer’s review found that the amount of the retainer provided to the Chair of the Finance Committee was below the median paid tonon-employee directors in the assessment group. Following the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, effective January 1, 2019, the Board approved an annual retainer for the Chair of the newly established Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee of $15,000 (or $7,500 for eachCo-Chair) and an increase to the annual retainer for the Chair of the Finance Committee to $15,000 (from $5,000). Compensation for individual Directors approximates the median of compensation for Directors in similar positions at the compensation peer group.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

In 2018,non-employee Directors were eligible to receive the following:

Amount

($)

Annual Retainer(1)

115,000

Lead Director Retainer

35,000

Chair of Audit Committee Retainer(2)

30,000

Member of Audit Committee Retainer (excluding the Audit Committee Chair)(3)

15,000

Chair of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Retainer(4)

15,000

Chair of Management Development and Compensation Committee Retainer

15,000

Retainer for Chairs of: Environment, Health and Safety Committee; Finance Committee; and Operations Oversight Committee

5,000

Acting Committee Chair Fee (where the regular Chair is absent)

200

Audit Committee member fee (for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended)(5)

2,000

Committee member meeting fee (for each Committee meeting attended)(5)

1,500

Annual equity award (deferred stock units)(6)

150,000

Footnotes:

(1)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer was increased from $100,000 to $115,000.
(2)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee was increased from $25,000 to $30,000.
(3)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the members of the Audit Committee (excluding the Chair of the Audit Committee) was increased from $10,000 to $15,000.
(4)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was increased from $10,000 to $15,000.
(5)Effective April 1, 2018, all Committee member meeting fees were eliminated.
(6)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual equity award was increased from $135,000 to $150,000.

In 2018, the Company reimbursednon-employee Directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.

No person who served on both the Company Board and on the Board of its subsidiary, Con Edison of New York, and corresponding Committees, was paid additional compensation for concurrent service. Directors who are employees of the

20CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGODIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Company or its subsidiaries do not receive retainers, meeting fees, or annual equity awards for their service on the Board.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Company has stock ownership guidelines fornon-employee Directors which provide that, within five years of joining the Board, each Director should own, and continue to hold during his or her tenure on the Board, shares (including stock equivalents and restricted stock units) with a value (measured at the time the shares are acquired) equal to five times (increased in 2018 from four times) the annual retainer (not including committee and/or committee chair fees) paid to such Director during the previous fiscal year. As of December 31, 2018, all Directors have either exceeded their stock ownership guideline requirement or are making satisfactory progress towards meeting the requirement.

LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Non-employee Directors participate in the Company’s long term incentive plan. Pursuant to the long term incentive plan, eachnon-employee Director then serving was allocated an annual equity award of $150,000 of deferred stock units on the first business day following the 2018 Annual Meeting (increased from $135,000 effective April 1, 2018). If anon-employee Director is first appointed to the Board after an annual meeting, his or her first annual equity award will be prorated.

Settlement of the 2018 annual equity awards of stock units was automatically deferred until the Director’s termination of service from the Board of Directors. Eachnon-employee Director may elect to receive some or all of his or her 2018

annual equity awards of stock units on another date or to further defer any other prior annual equity award of stock units, including any related dividend equivalents earned on such prior annual equity awards of stock units.

Eachnon-employee Director may also elect to defer all or a portion of his or her 2018 retainers and meeting fees into additional deferred stock units, which are deferred until the Director’s termination of service.

Dividend equivalents are payable on 2018 deferred stock units in the amount and at the time that dividends are paid on Company Common Stock and are credited in the form of additional deferred stock units which are fully vested as of the date the dividends would have been paid to the Director or, at the Director’s option, are paid in cash.

All payments on account of deferred stock units will be made in shares of Company Common Stock. The long term incentive plan provides that cash compensation deferred into stock units, annual equity awards, and dividend equivalents granted tonon-employee Directors that are credited in the form of additional deferred stock units, are fully vested, and payable in a singleone-time payment of whole shares (rounded to the nearest whole share) within 60 days following separation from Board service, unless the Director elected to defer distribution to another date.

STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Directors are eligible to participate in the stock purchase plan, which is described in Note M to the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement21


LOGODIRECTOR COMPENSATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation for the members of the Company’s Board of Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

Stock
Awards(1)
All Other
Compensation(2)
Total
  Name($)($)($)($)

  Vincent A. Calarco(3)

 58,066   —   —   58,066

  George Campbell, Jr.

 132,250   150,000 5,000(4)  287,250

  Michael J. Del Giudice(3)

 7,682   —   —   7,682

  Ellen V. Futter

 119,250   150,000 5,000 274,250

  John F. Killian

 140,689   150,000 —   290,689

  John McAvoy(5)

 —     —   —   —  

  William J. Mulrow

 115,750   150,000 10,000(4)  275,750

  Armando J. Olivera

 131,690   150,000 —   281,690

  Michael W. Ranger

 179,750   150,000 —   329,750

  Linda S. Sanford

 117,250   150,000 —   267,250

  Deirdre Stanley

 117,250   150,000 —   267,250

  L. Frederick Sutherland

 135,000   150,000 —   285,000

Footnotes:

(1)On May 22, 2018, each of thenon-employee Directors elected at the 2018 Annual Meeting received a grant of 2,031 stock units valued at $73.84 per share, the equivalent of $150,000. The stock units were fully vested at the time of grant. Pursuant to the Company’s long term incentive plan, and as indicated in Note Mto the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the stock units are valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate number of stock units for eachnon-employee director as of December 31, 2018 is as follows: Mr. Calarco—0; Dr. Campbell—38,277; Mr. Del Giudice—1,664; Ms. Futter—32,857; Mr. Killian—24,571; Mr. Mulrow—2,888; Mr. Olivera—11,369; Mr. Ranger—53,020; Ms. Sanford—8,832; Ms. Stanley—4,583, and Mr. Sutherland—53,956.
(2)The “All Other Compensation” column includes matching contributions made by the Company to qualified institutions under its matching gift program. All directors and employees are eligible to participate in this program. Under the Company’s matching gift program, the Company matches up to a total of $5,000 per eligible participant on aone-for-one basis to qualified institutions per calendar year.
(3)Messrs. Calarco and Del Giudice served as members of the Board of Directors until May 21, 2018 and January 18, 2018, respectively.
(4)The amounts reported in the “All Other Compensation” column include amounts matched by the Company at the end of 2017 and paid in 2018 under the Company’s matching gift program.
(5)Mr. McAvoy did not receive any director compensation because he is an employee of the Company.

22CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOSTOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

STOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table provides, as of February 28, 2019, the amount of shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by each Director, each Named Executive Officer, and by all Directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and information about the amount of their other Company equity-based holdings.

NameShares  Beneficially
Owned(1)
Other Equity-Based
Holdings(2)
Total(3)
(#)(#)(#)

Vincent A. Calarco(4)

 —     —     —    

George Campbell, Jr.

 28,416   13,911   42,327  

Michael J. Del Giudice(5)

 —     1,665   1,665  

Ellen V. Futter

 27,479   7,724   35,203  

John F. Killian

 15,290   9,281   24,571  

William J. Mulrow

 —     2,888   2,888  

Armando J. Olivera

 11,869   —     11,869  

Michael W. Ranger

 53,020   —     53,020  

Linda S. Sanford

 11,232   —     11,232  

Deirdre Stanley

 —     4,583   4,583  

L. Frederick Sutherland

 50,917   7,039   57,956  

John McAvoy

 8,439   120,685   129,124  

Robert Hoglund

 9,007   30,000   39,007  

Timothy P. Cawley

 2,905   11,618   14,523  

Elizabeth D. Moore

 2,876   37,879   40,755  

Robert Sanchez

 2,567   —     2,567  
Directors and Executive Officers as a group, including the above-named persons (24 persons) 245,829   323,864   569,693  

Footnotes:

(1)The number of shares shown includes shares of Company Common Stock that are individually or jointly owned, as well as shares over which the individual has sole or shared investment or sole or shared voting power. The number of shares shown also includes vested stock units, as to which the individual may obtain investment or voting power within 60 days following separation from service: Mr. Calarco—0; Dr. Campbell—24,366; Mr. Del Giudice—0; Ms. Futter—25,133; Mr. Killian—15,290; Mr. Mulrow—0; Mr. Olivera—11,369; Mr. Ranger—53,020; Ms. Sanford—8,832; Ms. Stanley—0; Mr. Sutherland—46,917; Mr. McAvoy—0; Mr. Hoglund—0; Mr. Cawley—0; Ms. Moore—0; Mr. Sanchez—0; and directors and executive officers as a group—184,927.
(2)Represents vested stock units, as to which the individual may not, within 60 days after February 28, 2019, obtain investment or voting power.
(3)As of February 28, 2019, ownership was, in each case, less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding 321,141,148 shares.
(4)Mr. Calarco retired effective May 21, 2018. On May 25, 2018, the Company distributed 36,918 shares of Company Common Stock to Mr. Calarco pursuant to his deferral elections under the long term incentive plan.
(5)Mr. Del Giudice retired effective January 18, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the Company distributed 45,817 shares of Company Common Stock to Mr. Del Giudice pursuant to his deferral elections under the long term incentive plan.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement23


LOGOSTOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2018, with respect to persons who are known to the Company to beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of Company Common Stock.

  Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
  Percent of Class 
  (#)  (%)

 BlackRock, Inc.

 55 East 52nd Street

 New York, NY 10055

    28,920,573(1)     9.30

 The Vanguard Group

 100 Vanguard Blvd.

 Malvern, PA 19355

    25,320,457(2)     7.78

 State Street Corporation

 State Street Financial Center

 One Lincoln Street

 Boston, MA 02111

    19,208,542(3)     6.20

Footnotes:

(1)BlackRock, Inc. stated in its Schedule 13G/A, filed on February 4, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has sole voting power for 24,797,804 of these shares and sole dispositive power for 28,920,573 of these shares.
(2)The Vanguard Group stated in its Schedule 13G/A, filed on February 11, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has sole voting power for 419,553 of these shares, shared voting power for 219,083 of these shares, sole dispositive power for 24,749,579 of these shares, and shared dispositive power for 570,878 of these shares.
(3)State Street Corporation stated in its Schedule 13G, filed on February 14, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has shared voting power for 17,509,208 of these shares and shared dispositive power for 19,204,187 of these shares.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Directors and executive officers of the Company to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the equity securities of the Company and its subsidiaries with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish copies of these reports to the Company, within specified time limits. Based upon its review of the reports furnished to the Company for 2018 pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act, the Company believes that all of the reports were filed on a timely basis.

24CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGORATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS RATIFICATION

PROPOSAL NO. 2    RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

At the Annual Meeting, as a matter of sound corporate governance, stockholders will be asked to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as independent accountants for the Company for 2017.2019. If the appointment of PwC is not ratified, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration in the future appointment of independent accountants.

PwC has acted as independent accountants for the Company for many years. The Audit Committee considered PwC’s qualifications in determining whether to appoint PwC as independent accountants for 2017.2019. The Audit Committee reviewed PwC’s performance, as well as PwC’s reputation for

integrity and for competence in the fields of accounting and

auditing. The Audit Committee also reviewed a report provided by PwC regarding its quality controls, inquiries or investigations by governmental or professional authorities and independence. (See “Audit Committee Matters” on page 25.) Based on this review, the

The Audit Committee, believes thatcurrently John F. Killian (Chair), Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, Linda S. Sanford, and L. Frederick Sutherland, is composed of five independent Directors. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment of PwC asthe independent accountants for the Company, for 2017 is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Representatives of PwC will be presentsubject to stockholder ratification at the Annual Meeting andMeeting. The Audit Committee has appointed PwC as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year 2019. If the appointment of PwC is not ratified, the Audit Committee will be affordedtake this into consideration in the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.

future selection of independent accountants.

The Board Recommends a Vote FOR Proposal No. 2.


Ratification of Proposal No. 2 requiresAudit Committee is directly responsible for the affirmative vote of a majorityappointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the votes cast onwork of the proposal atindependent accountants for the Annual Meeting,Company. The Audit Committee reviews the proposed auditing andnon-audit fees and approves in person or by proxy. Abstentionsadvance the proposed auditing and brokernon-votesnon-audit are voted neither “for” nor “against,” and have no effect onservices associated with the vote.


12CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOMATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSAL NO. 3    ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Company valuesCompany’s retention of the opinions of its stockholders,independent accountants. Every five years, the Audit Committee evaluates whether it is appropriate to rotate the Company’s independent accountants and, in accordanceconjunction with Section 14Amandatory rotation of the lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee is directly involved in selecting the lead engagement partner of the independent accountants. The Audit Committee meets with the Company’s management, including Con Edison of New York’s General Auditor, the General Counsel, and the Company’s independent accountants, several times a year to discuss internal controls and accounting matters, the Company’s financial statements, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, earnings press releases and the scope and results of the auditing programs of the independent accountants and of Con Edison of New York’s internal auditing department. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies, and the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards and Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the stockholders have the opportunity to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers (commonly referred to as a “say on pay” vote) as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this Proxy Statement, the related compensation disclosure tables, and the narrative discussion that accompanies the compensation disclosure tables on pages 27 to 59. The Company currently conducts such votes annually. The Board recommends that the stockholders vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. In 2016, the Company held a say on pay vote and 92.15% of the shares voted were voted “for” the proposal. Following this year’s say on pay vote, the next such vote will be at the Company’s 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.

As discussed in the CD&A, the Company’s executive compensation program is designed to assist in attracting and retaining key executives critical to its long-term success, to motivate these executives to create value for its stockholders, and to provide safe, reliable, and efficient service for its customers. The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, seeks to provide base salary and performance-based compensation, including target annual cash incentive compensation and target long-term equity-based incentive compensation, that are competitive with the median level of compensation provided by the Company’s compensation peer group and effectively link pay with performance.

The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based compensation should represent the most significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s target total direct compensation and should be in the form of long-term, rather than annual incentives, to emphasize the importance of sustained Company performance. Each year, the Compensation Committee evaluates the level of compensation, the mix of base salary, performance-based compensation and retirement and welfare benefits provided to each Named Executive Officer.

The Compensation Committee chooses performance goals under the annual incentive plan and the long term incentive plan to support the Company’s short- and long-term business plans and strategies. In setting targets for the short- and long-term performance goals, the Compensation Committee considers the Company’s annual and long-term business plans and certain other factors, includingpay-for-performance alignment, economic and industry conditions, and the practices of the compensation peer group. The Compensation Committee sets challenging, but achievable, goals for the Company and its executives to drive the achievement of short- and long-term objectives.

For the reasons indicated and more fully discussed in the CD&A, the Board recommends that the stockholders vote in favor of the following advisory resolution:

“RESOLVED, That the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative discussion that accompany the compensation disclosure tables is hereby approved.”

The Board Recommends a Vote FOR Proposal No. 3.


Approval of Proposal No. 3 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are voted neither “for” nor “against,” and have no effect on the vote.

As an advisory vote, Proposal No. 3 is not binding on the Company, the Board, or the Compensation Committee. However, the Company, the Board, and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Company’s stockholders as expressed through their vote and other communications and will consider the voting results when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers.


CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement13


LOGOMATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSAL NO. 4    ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

As described in Proposal No. 3, the stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation (commonly referred to as a “say on pay” vote). In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this Proposal No. 4 provides the stockholders with the opportunity, at least once every six years, to provide an advisory vote on how often the Company should include a say on pay vote in the Company’s proxy statement for future annual stockholder meetings (commonly referred to as a “say on pay” frequency vote).

Under this Proposal No. 4, the stockholders may vote to have the say on pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years, or may abstain from voting. In 2011, the Company held

its first advisory vote on the say on pay frequency vote and 86.68% of the shares voted were voted “for” an annual vote. Following this year’s say on pay frequency vote, it is expected that the next such vote will be at the Company’s 2023 annual stockholders’ meeting. Stockholders may cast their advisory vote on the say on pay frequency vote every “1 Year,” “2 Years,” or “3 Years,” or “Abstain.”

The Board recommends that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, continuing to hold an annual say on pay vote. The Board continues to believe that an annual vote is the most appropriate for the Company as it will provide the stockholders with an opportunity to express their views on the Company’s executive compensation program in a consistent and timely manner.

The Board Recommends a Vote of 1 YEAR for Proposal No. 4.


Approval of Proposal No. 4 requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast on the proposal at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy. This means that the option for holding an advisory vote every one year, two years, or three years receiving the greatest number of votes will be considered the preferred frequency of the stockholders. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are voted neither “for” nor “against,” and have no effect on the vote.

As an advisory vote, Proposal No. 4 is not binding on the Company, the Board, or the Compensation Committee. However, the Company, the Board, and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of the stockholders as expressed through their vote and other communications and will consider the results of this advisory vote when making future decisions about the frequency of the say on pay vote.


14CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MEETINGS AND BOARD MEMBERS’ ATTENDANCE

1934. The Board of Directors held 11 meetings in 2016. At its meetings the Board considers a wide variety of matters involving such things as the Company’s strategic planning, its financial condition and results of operations, its capital and operating budgets, personnel matters, succession planning, risk management, industry issues, accounting practices and disclosure, and corporate governance practices.

In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (currently Mr. Del Giudice) serves as Lead Director and, as such, chairs the executive sessions of thenon-management Directors and the independent Directors. The Company’s independent Directors met twice in executive session and thenon-management Directors met nine times in executive session during 2016.

During 2016, each member of the Board attended more than 75% of the combined meetings of the Board of Directors and the Board Committees on which he or she served held during the period that he or she served. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All of the Directors attended the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company’s corporate governance documents, including its Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Management Development and Compensation Committees, and the Standards of Business Conduct, are available on the Company’s website atconedison.com/shareholders.The Standards of Business Conduct applies to all Directors, officers and employees. The Company intends to post on its website atconedison.com/shareholders amendments to its Standards of Business Conduct and a description of any waiver from a provision of the Standards of Business Conduct granted by the Board to any Director or executive officer of the Company within four business days after such amendment or waiver.

PROXY ACCESS

The Company developed and implemented a proxy access frameworkhas determined that allows a stockholder or a group of up to 20 stockholders who have owned at least three percent (3%) of the outstanding shares of the Company for at least three years

to submit nominees for up to twenty percent (20%) of the Board, or two nominees, whichever is greater, for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy, subject to complying with the requirements identified in theBy-laws of the Company.

LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

As discussed in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board selects the Company’s chief executive officer and chairman of the Board in the manner that it determines to be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s leadership structure combines the roles of the chairman and chief executive officer. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company due to a variety of factors, including Mr. McAvoy’s long-standing knowledge of the Company and the utility industry, and his extensive engineering, financial, and operations experience.

The Board has an independent Lead Director who is the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Lead Director: (i) acts as a liaison between the independent Directors and the Company’s management; (ii) chairs the executive sessions ofnon-management and independent Directors and has the authority to call additional executive sessions as appropriate; (iii) chairs Board meetings in the Chairman’s absence; (iv) coordinates with the Chairman on agendas and schedules for Board meetings, information flow to the Board, and other matters pertinent to the Company and the Board; and (v) is available for consultation and communication with major stockholders as appropriate.

The Board consists of a substantial majority of Directors who are independent. (See “The Board of Directors—Board Members’ Independence” on pages 16 to 17.) The Board routinely holds executive sessions at which onlynon-management Directors are present, and the independent Directors meet in executive session at least once a year.

Pursuant to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has oversight responsibility for reviewing the Company’s strategic plans, objectives and risks. Each of the standing committees of the Board, other than the Executive Committee, is chaired bynon-management Directors. (See “The Board of Directors—Standing Committees of the Board” on pages 17 to 19).each

 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  15


LOGOLOGO  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

of John F. Killian, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland is an “audit committee financial expert” as the term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Audit Committee held six meetings in 2018.

RISK OVERSIGHTCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Board’s primary functionCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee, currently Michael W. Ranger, Chair, George Campbell, Jr., John F. Killian, Linda S. Sanford, and Deirdre Stanley, is onecomposed of oversight. In connection with its oversight function,five independent Directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee annually evaluates each Director’s individual performance when considering whether to nominate the Director forre-election to the Board and is responsible for recommending candidates to fill vacancies on the Board. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assists with respect to the composition and size of the Board and of all Committees of the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also makes recommendations to the Board as to the compensation of Board members, as well as other corporate governance matters, including Board independence criteria and determinations and corporate governance guidelines. Additionally, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees the Company’s policiesmanagement of risks relating to its duties and procedures for managing risk. The Board administers its risk oversight function primarily through its Committees that report to the Board. Board Committees have assumed oversight of various risksresponsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies and the Audit Committee reports to the Board on the Company’s risk management program. Management regularly provides reports to the Board and

Among its Committees concerning risks identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS AND POLICY

The Company has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions between the Company and its Directors, Director nominees, executive officers, greater-than-five percent (5%) beneficial owners, and their respective immediate family members, where the amount involved in the transaction since the beginning of the Company’s last completed fiscal year exceeds or is expected to exceed $100,000.

The policy provides thatduties, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews certain transactions subjectthe skills and characteristics of Director candidates, including their independence, integrity, judgment, business experience, areas of expertise and availability for service, factors relating to the policycomposition of the Board (including its size and determines whether or not to approve or ratify those transactions. In doing so, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstancesstructure) and the extentCompany’s principles of the related person’s interest in the transaction. In addition, the Board has delegated authority to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee topre-approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $1.0 million. A summary of any new transactionspre-approved by the Chair will be provided to the full Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for its review in connection with a regularly scheduled committee meeting.diversity.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has consideredthe authority under its charter to hire advisors to assist it in its decisions. The Corporate Governance and adopted standingpre-approvals underNominating Committee identifies director candidates through a variety of means, including professional search firms, recommendations from members of the policy for limited transactions with related persons.Pre-approved transactions include:

(i)business transactions with other companies at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other
than an executive officer), if the amount of business falls below the thresholds in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards and the Company’s Director independence standards; and

(ii)contributions tonon-profit organizations at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) if the aggregate amount involved is less than both $1.0 million and two percent (2%) of the organization’s consolidated gross annual revenues.

In 2016, Ms. Futter’s brother received approximately $161,000 for providing legal services to Con Edison of New YorkBoard, suggestions from senior management, and is providing legal services in 2017. The provision of these services by Ms. Futter’s brother was approvedsubmissions by the Company’s stockholders. When using a professional search firm, the firm assists in developing criteria for potential Board members to complement the Board’s existing strengths. Based on such criteria, the firm also provides, for review and consideration, lists of potential candidates with background information. After consulting with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the firm further screens and interviews candidates as directed to determine their qualifications, interest and any

potential conflicts of interest and provides its results to the Committee.

BOARD MEMBERS’ INDEPENDENCE The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also considers candidates recommended by stockholders. There are no differences in the manner in which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders versus those recommended through other means. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will make an initial determination as to whether a particular candidate meets the Company’s criteria for Board membership, and will then further consider candidates that do. Stockholder recommendations for candidates, accompanied by biographical material for evaluation, may be sent to the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company. Each recommendation should include information as to the qualifications of the candidate and should be accompanied by a written statement (presented to the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company) from the suggested candidate to the effect that the candidate is willing to serve.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has also retained Mercer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to provide information, analyses, and objective advice regarding director compensation. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee directs Mercer to: (i) assist it by providing competitive market information on the design of the director compensation program; (ii) advise it on the design of the director compensation program and also provide advice on the administration of the program; and (iii) brief it on director compensation trends among the Company’s compensation peer group and broader industry. The Board members, including the chief executive officer, consider the recommendations of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following DirectorsCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The decisions may reflect factors and considerations in addition to the information and advice provided by Mercer. All of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards: Mr. Calarco, Dr. Campbell, Mr. Del Giudice, Mr. Killian, Mr. Olivera, Mr. Ranger, Ms. Sanford,standards. The Corporate Governance and Mr. Sutherland.Nominating Committee held four meetings in 2018.

To assist it in making determinations of Director independence,Environment, Health and Safety Committee

Effective December 31, 2018, the Board has adopted independence standards, which are set forth in its Corporate Governance Guidelines, available onof Directors dissolved the Company’s website atconedison.com/shareholders. Under these standards, the Board has determined that eachEnvironment, Health and Safety Committee as a standing committee of the following relationships is categorically immaterialBoard. The duties and therefore, by itself, does not precluderesponsibilities of the Environment, Health and Safety Committee were merged with the duties and responsibilities of the Operations Oversight Committee and a Director from being independent:new standing committee was formed effective January 1, 2019–the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee. The Environment, Health and

(i)(a) the Director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of the Company’s internal or external auditor, but the immediate family member does not personally work on the Company’s audit; or (b) the Director or an immediate family member was, within the last three years, a partner or employee of such a firm but no longer works at the firm and did not personally work on the Company’s audit within that time;

(ii)the Director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed at another company where any of the Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee, but the Director or the Director’s immediate family member is not an executive officer of the other company and his or her compensation is not determined or reviewed by that company’s compensation committee;
 

 

16 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Safety Committee provided advice and counsel to the Company’s management on corporate environment, health and safety policies and on such other environment, health, safety, and sustainability matters as it from time to time deemed appropriate.

The Environment, Health and Safety Committee also reviewed significant issues identified by management relating to the Company’s environment, health, and safety programs and its compliance with environment, health, and safety laws and regulations, and made such other reviews and recommended to the Board such other actions as it deemed necessary or desirable to help promote sound planning by the Company with due regard to the protection of the environment, health, and safety. Additionally, the Environment, Health and Safety Committee oversaw the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that were identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. Immediately prior to its dissolution, the Environment, Health and Safety Committee was composed of fournon-management Directors–Ellen V. Futter, Chair, William J. Mulrow, Linda S. Sanford, and Deirdre Stanley. The Environment, Health and Safety Committee held four meetings in 2018.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee, currently John McAvoy, Chair, and four Directors (three of whom are independent), George Campbell, Jr., Ellen V. Futter, John F. Killian, and Michael W. Ranger, may exercise, during intervals between the meetings of the Board, all the powers vested in the Board, except for certain specified matters. No meetings of the Executive Committee were held in 2018.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee, currently L. Frederick Sutherland, Chair, William J. Mulrow, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, and Linda S. Sanford, is composed of five independent Directors. The Finance Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s financial condition and policies, capital and operating budgets, financial forecasts, major contracts and real estate transactions, financings, investments, bank credit arrangements, its dividend policy, strategic business plan, litigation, and other financial matters. Additionally, the Finance Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks, relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Finance Committee held nine meetings in 2018.

Management Development and Compensation Committee

The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), currently George Campbell, Jr., Chair, John F. Killian, William J. Mulrow, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland, is composed of five independent Directors. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board relating to officer and senior management appointments. The Compensation Committee also establishes and oversees the Company’s executive compensation and welfare benefit plans and policies, administers its equity plans and annual incentive plan and reviews and approves annually compensation relating to the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s executive compensation program, with the exception of the salary of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange & Rockland which is approved by the Board of Directors of Orange & Rockland. Additionally, the Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks, relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

The Compensation Committee has the authority, under its charter, to engage the services of outside advisors, experts, and others to assist it. The Compensation Committee engages Mercer to provide information, analyses, and objective advice regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee directs Mercer to: (i) assist it in the development and assessment of the compensation peer group for the purposes of providing competitive market information for the design of the executive compensation program; (ii) compare the Company’s chief executive officer’s base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation to that of the chief executive officers of the identified compensation peer group and broader industry; (iii) advise it on the officers’ base salaries and target award levels within the annual and long-term incentive plans; (iv) advise it on the design of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive plans and on the administration of the plans; (v) brief it on executive compensation trends among the Company’s compensation peer group and broader industry; and (vi) assist with the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2018 and Mercer attended three meetings.

For a discussion of the role of the Compensation Committee and information about the Company’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 28.

(iii)
CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  the Director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in any of the last three fiscal years, but the total payments in each year were less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%) of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater;17


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

In addition, the Compensation Committee also reviews and makes recommendations as necessary to provide for orderly succession and transition in the senior management of the Company and receives reports and makes recommendations with respect to minority and female recruitment, employment and promotion.

The Compensation Committee also oversees and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), and reviews and makes recommendations with respect to benefit plans and plan amendments, the selection of plan trustees and the funding policy and contributions to the funded plans, and reviews the performance of the funded plans.

Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is “independent,” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards under Rule10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and meets the “outside director” criteria of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the“Non-Employee” Director criteria of Rule16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Operations Oversight Committee

Effective December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors dissolved the Operations Oversight Committee as a standing committee of the Board. The duties and responsibilities of the Operations Oversight Committee were merged with the duties and responsibilities of the Environment, Health and Safety Committee and a new standing committee was formed effective January 1, 2019–the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee. The Operations Oversight Committee oversaw the Company’s efforts relating to the Company’s operating systems and their impact on the customer. The Operations Oversight Committee also reviewed significant issues identified by the Company relating to the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems and their impact on the customer. The Operations Oversight Committee also reviewed the compliance of the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems with laws and regulations and the Company’s corporate policies and procedures, as it deemed necessary or appropriate. Additionally, the Operations Oversight Committee oversaw the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that were identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. Immediately prior to its dissolution, the Operations Oversight Committee was composed of fournon-management Directors–Armando J. Olivera, Chair, George Campbell,

Jr., Ellen V. Futter, and Deirdre Stanley. The Operations Oversight Committee held four meetings in 2018.

Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee

Effective January 1, 2019, the Board of Directors established the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee as a standing committee of the Board. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee, currently Ellen V. Futter,Co-Chair, Armando J. Olivera,Co-Chair, George Campbell, Jr., William J. Mulrow, and Deirdre Stanley, is composed of fivenon-management Directors. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee oversees the Company’s efforts relating to corporate responsibility and sustainability, which includes operating in a safe, environmentally sensitive and socially responsible manner, guarding the health and safety of Company employees and the public, supporting the development and success of Company employees, delivering value to customers and fostering growth to meet the expectations of investors. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee reviews significant issues identified by the Company relating to: (i) the Company’s subsidiaries’ environment, health, and safety programs and their compliance with environment, health, and safety laws and regulations, and the Company’s corporate environment, health, and safety policies and procedures, as may be necessary or appropriate; (ii) the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems, the operating systems’ impact on the customer, and the operating systems’ compliance with laws and regulations and the Company’s corporate policies and procedures, as may be necessary or appropriate; and (iii) the Company’s subsidiaries’ sustainability priorities, initiatives, and strategies. Additionally, the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

COMPENSATION CONSULTANT DISCLOSURE

The Compensation Committee has retained Mercer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to assist with its responsibilities related to the Company’s executive compensation programs and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has retained Mercer to assist with its responsibilities related to the director compensation program, including the design and structure of the Company’s long term incentive plan. Mercer’s fees for

18CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

executive and director compensation consulting to the committees in 2018 were approximately $510,340.

During 2018, the Company retained Marsh & McLennan affiliates (other than Mercer) to provide services, unrelated to executive compensation. These services were approved by the Company’s management. The aggregate fees paid for these other services, which include auction services, compensation planning surveys, and employee benefit guides, were approximately $45,050.

The Compensation Committee considered the independence of Mercer under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Compensation Committee concluded that the services provided by the Marsh & McLennan affiliates (other than Mercer) did not raise any conflicts of interest and did not impair Mercer’s ability to provide independent advice to the Compensation Committee concerning executive or director compensation matters.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

George Campbell, Jr. (Chair), John F. Killian, William J. Mulrow, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland were on the Company’s Compensation Committee during 2018. The Company believes that there are no interlocks with the members of the Compensation Committee.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Interested parties may communicate directly with the members of the Company’s Board of Directors, including thenon-management Directors as a group, by writing to them, care of the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Secretary, at the Company’s principal executive office at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003. The Vice President and Corporate Secretary will forward communications to the Director or the Directors indicated.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement19


LOGODIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

(iv)

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

OVERVIEW

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews director compensationbi-annually. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers information, analyses, and objective advice regarding director compensation provided by Mercer. Director compensation is assessed relative to the Company’s compensation peer group (the same group used to evaluate executive compensation), general industry trends, and the total cost of governance. The Board reviews the recommendations of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee when determining whether changes, if any, will be made.

In February 2018, as part of its review of Director compensation, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requested that Mercer conduct anin-depth analysis of each element of compensation and the compensation program structure relative to the compensation peer group. Mercer’s review found that Committee member meeting fees were on the decline for the assessment group as companies focused more on compensating Directors for their expertise than their time. Following the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, effective April 1, 2018, the Board approved the elimination of Committee member meeting fees and an increase to the stock ownership guidelines. Certain retainers and the value of the annual equity award were increased to replace the Committee member meeting fees.

In November 2018, the Board dissolved two committees effective December 31, 2018 and established a new committee effective January 1, 2019. In connection with these committee changes, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requested that Mercer conduct a second, limited analysis of committee chair retainers relative to the compensation peer group. Mercer’s review found that the amount of the retainer provided to the Chair of the Finance Committee was below the median paid tonon-employee directors in the assessment group. Following the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, effective January 1, 2019, the Board approved an annual retainer for the Chair of the newly established Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee of $15,000 (or $7,500 for eachCo-Chair) and an increase to the annual retainer for the Chair of the Finance Committee to $15,000 (from $5,000). Compensation for individual Directors approximates the median of compensation for Directors in similar positions at the compensation peer group.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

In 2018,non-employee Directors were eligible to receive the following:

  

Amount

($)

Annual Retainer(1)

115,000

Lead Director Retainer

35,000

Chair of Audit Committee Retainer(2)

30,000

Member of Audit Committee Retainer (excluding the DirectorAudit Committee Chair)(3)

15,000

Chair of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Retainer(4)

15,000

Chair of Management Development and Compensation Committee Retainer

15,000

Retainer for Chairs of: Environment, Health and Safety Committee; Finance Committee; and Operations Oversight Committee

5,000

Acting Committee Chair Fee (where the regular Chair is a partner or the owner of five percent (5%) or moreabsent)

200

Audit Committee member fee (for each meeting of the votingAudit Committee attended)(5)

2,000

Committee member meeting fee (for each Committee meeting attended)(5)

1,500

Annual equity award (deferred stock units)(6)

150,000

Footnotes:

(1)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer was increased from $100,000 to $115,000.
(2)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the Chair of another company thatthe Audit Committee was increased from $25,000 to $30,000.
(3)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the members of the Audit Committee (excluding the Chair of the Audit Committee) was increased from $10,000 to $15,000.
(4)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was increased from $10,000 to $15,000.
(5)Effective April 1, 2018, all Committee member meeting fees were eliminated.
(6)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual equity award was increased from $135,000 to $150,000.

In 2018, the Company reimbursednon-employee Directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.

No person who served on both the Company Board and on the Board of its subsidiary, Con Edison of New York, and corresponding Committees, was paid additional compensation for concurrent service. Directors who are employees of the

20CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGODIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Company or its subsidiaries do not receive retainers, meeting fees, or annual equity awards for their service on the Board.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Company has stock ownership guidelines fornon-employee Directors which provide that, within five years of joining the Board, each Director should own, and continue to hold during his or her tenure on the Board, shares (including stock equivalents and restricted stock units) with a value (measured at the time the shares are acquired) equal to five times (increased in 2018 from four times) the annual retainer (not including committee and/or committee chair fees) paid to such Director during the previous fiscal year. As of December 31, 2018, all Directors have either exceeded their stock ownership guideline requirement or are making satisfactory progress towards meeting the requirement.

LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Non-employee Directors participate in the Company’s long term incentive plan. Pursuant to the long term incentive plan, eachnon-employee Director then serving was allocated an annual equity award of $150,000 of deferred stock units on the first business day following the 2018 Annual Meeting (increased from $135,000 effective April 1, 2018). If anon-employee Director is first appointed to the Board after an annual meeting, his or her first annual equity award will be prorated.

Settlement of the 2018 annual equity awards of stock units was automatically deferred until the Director’s termination of service from the Board of Directors. Eachnon-employee Director may elect to receive some or all of his or her 2018

annual equity awards of stock units on another date or to further defer any other prior annual equity award of stock units, including any related dividend equivalents earned on such prior annual equity awards of stock units.

Eachnon-employee Director may also elect to defer all or a portion of his or her 2018 retainers and meeting fees into additional deferred stock units, which are deferred until the Director’s termination of service.

Dividend equivalents are payable on 2018 deferred stock units in the amount and at the time that dividends are paid on Company Common Stock and are credited in the form of additional deferred stock units which are fully vested as of the date the dividends would have been paid to the Director or, at the Director’s option, are paid in cash.

All payments on account of deferred stock units will be made in shares of Company Common Stock. The long term incentive plan provides that cash compensation deferred into stock units, annual equity awards, and dividend equivalents granted tonon-employee Directors that are credited in the form of additional deferred stock units, are fully vested, and payable in a singleone-time payment of whole shares (rounded to the nearest whole share) within 60 days following separation from Board service, unless the Director elected to defer distribution to another date.

STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Directors are eligible to participate in the stock purchase plan, which is described in Note M to the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement21


LOGODIRECTOR COMPENSATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation for the members of the Company’s Board of Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

Stock
Awards(1)
All Other
Compensation(2)
Total
  Name($)($)($)($)

  Vincent A. Calarco(3)

 58,066   —   —   58,066

  George Campbell, Jr.

 132,250   150,000 5,000(4)  287,250

  Michael J. Del Giudice(3)

 7,682   —   —   7,682

  Ellen V. Futter

 119,250   150,000 5,000 274,250

  John F. Killian

 140,689   150,000 —   290,689

  John McAvoy(5)

 —     —   —   —  

  William J. Mulrow

 115,750   150,000 10,000(4)  275,750

  Armando J. Olivera

 131,690   150,000 —   281,690

  Michael W. Ranger

 179,750   150,000 —   329,750

  Linda S. Sanford

 117,250   150,000 —   267,250

  Deirdre Stanley

 117,250   150,000 —   267,250

  L. Frederick Sutherland

 135,000   150,000 —   285,000

Footnotes:

(1)On May 22, 2018, each of thenon-employee Directors elected at the 2018 Annual Meeting received a grant of 2,031 stock units valued at $73.84 per share, the equivalent of $150,000. The stock units were fully vested at the time of grant. Pursuant to the Company’s long term incentive plan, and as indicated in Note Mto the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the stock units are valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate number of stock units for eachnon-employee director as of December 31, 2018 is as follows: Mr. Calarco—0; Dr. Campbell—38,277; Mr. Del Giudice—1,664; Ms. Futter—32,857; Mr. Killian—24,571; Mr. Mulrow—2,888; Mr. Olivera—11,369; Mr. Ranger—53,020; Ms. Sanford—8,832; Ms. Stanley—4,583, and Mr. Sutherland—53,956.
(2)The “All Other Compensation” column includes matching contributions made payments to, or received payments from,by the Company for property or servicesto qualified institutions under its matching gift program. All directors and employees are eligible to participate in anythis program. Under the Company’s matching gift program, the Company matches up to a total of $5,000 per eligible participant on aone-for-one basis to qualified institutions per calendar year.
(3)Messrs. Calarco and Del Giudice served as members of the last three fiscal years, butBoard of Directors until May 21, 2018 and January 18, 2018, respectively.
(4)The amounts reported in the total paymentsAll Other Compensation” column include amounts matched by the Company at the end of 2017 and paid in each year were less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%)2018 under the Company’s matching gift program.
(5)Mr. McAvoy did not receive any director compensation because he is an employee of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater;the Company.

 

(v)
22 the Director is a partner, the owner of five percent (5%) or more of the voting stock or an executive officer of another company which is indebted to the Company, or to which the Company is indebted, but the total amount of the indebtedness in each of the last three fiscal years was less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%) of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater; andCONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOSTOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

 

(vi)

the Director or an immediate family member is a director or an executive officer of anon-profitSTOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE organization to which the Company has made contributions in any of the last three fiscal years, but the Company’s total contributions to the organization in each year were less than $1.0 million, or two percent (2%) of such organization’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater.

STANDING COMMITTEESSTOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table provides, as of February 28, 2019, the amount of shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by each Director, each Named Executive Officer, and by all Directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and information about the amount of their other Company equity-based holdings.

NameShares  Beneficially
Owned(1)
Other Equity-Based
Holdings(2)
Total(3)
(#)(#)(#)

Vincent A. Calarco(4)

 —     —     —    

George Campbell, Jr.

 28,416   13,911   42,327  

Michael J. Del Giudice(5)

 —     1,665   1,665  

Ellen V. Futter

 27,479   7,724   35,203  

John F. Killian

 15,290   9,281   24,571  

William J. Mulrow

 —     2,888   2,888  

Armando J. Olivera

 11,869   —     11,869  

Michael W. Ranger

 53,020   —     53,020  

Linda S. Sanford

 11,232   —     11,232  

Deirdre Stanley

 —     4,583   4,583  

L. Frederick Sutherland

 50,917   7,039   57,956  

John McAvoy

 8,439   120,685   129,124  

Robert Hoglund

 9,007   30,000   39,007  

Timothy P. Cawley

 2,905   11,618   14,523  

Elizabeth D. Moore

 2,876   37,879   40,755  

Robert Sanchez

 2,567   —     2,567  
Directors and Executive Officers as a group, including the above-named persons (24 persons) 245,829   323,864   569,693  

Footnotes:

(1)The number of shares shown includes shares of Company Common Stock that are individually or jointly owned, as well as shares over which the individual has sole or shared investment or sole or shared voting power. The number of shares shown also includes vested stock units, as to which the individual may obtain investment or voting power within 60 days following separation from service: Mr. Calarco—0; Dr. Campbell—24,366; Mr. Del Giudice—0; Ms. Futter—25,133; Mr. Killian—15,290; Mr. Mulrow—0; Mr. Olivera—11,369; Mr. Ranger—53,020; Ms. Sanford—8,832; Ms. Stanley—0; Mr. Sutherland—46,917; Mr. McAvoy—0; Mr. Hoglund—0; Mr. Cawley—0; Ms. Moore—0; Mr. Sanchez—0; and directors and executive officers as a group—184,927.
(2)Represents vested stock units, as to which the individual may not, within 60 days after February 28, 2019, obtain investment or voting power.
(3)As of February 28, 2019, ownership was, in each case, less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding 321,141,148 shares.
(4)Mr. Calarco retired effective May 21, 2018. On May 25, 2018, the Company distributed 36,918 shares of Company Common Stock to Mr. Calarco pursuant to his deferral elections under the long term incentive plan.
(5)Mr. Del Giudice retired effective January 18, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the Company distributed 45,817 shares of Company Common Stock to Mr. Del Giudice pursuant to his deferral elections under the long term incentive plan.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement23


LOGOSTOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2018, with respect to persons who are known to the Company to beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of Company Common Stock.

  Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
  Percent of Class 
  (#)  (%)

 BlackRock, Inc.

 55 East 52nd Street

 New York, NY 10055

    28,920,573(1)     9.30

 The Vanguard Group

 100 Vanguard Blvd.

 Malvern, PA 19355

    25,320,457(2)     7.78

 State Street Corporation

 State Street Financial Center

 One Lincoln Street

 Boston, MA 02111

    19,208,542(3)     6.20

Footnotes:

(1)BlackRock, Inc. stated in its Schedule 13G/A, filed on February 4, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has sole voting power for 24,797,804 of these shares and sole dispositive power for 28,920,573 of these shares.
(2)The Vanguard Group stated in its Schedule 13G/A, filed on February 11, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has sole voting power for 419,553 of these shares, shared voting power for 219,083 of these shares, sole dispositive power for 24,749,579 of these shares, and shared dispositive power for 570,878 of these shares.
(3)State Street Corporation stated in its Schedule 13G, filed on February 14, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has shared voting power for 17,509,208 of these shares and shared dispositive power for 19,204,187 of these shares.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Directors and executive officers of the Company to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the equity securities of the Company and its subsidiaries with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish copies of these reports to the Company, within specified time limits. Based upon its review of the reports furnished to the Company for 2018 pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act, the Company believes that all of the reports were filed on a timely basis.

24CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGORATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS RATIFICATION

PROPOSAL NO. 2    RATIFICATION OF THE BOARDAPPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

At the Annual Meeting, as a matter of sound corporate governance, stockholders will be asked to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as independent accountants for the Company for 2019. If the appointment of PwC is not ratified, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration in the future appointment of independent accountants.

PwC has acted as independent accountants for the Company for many years. The Audit Committee considered PwC’s qualifications in determining whether to appoint PwC as independent accountants for 2019. The Audit Committee reviewed PwC’s performance, as well as PwC’s reputation for integrity and for competence in the fields of accounting and

auditing. The Audit Committee also reviewed a report provided by PwC regarding its quality controls, inquiries or investigations by governmental or professional authorities and independence. (See “Audit Committee

The Audit Committee, currently John F. Killian (Chair), Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, Linda S. Sanford, and L. Frederick Sutherland, is composed of five independent Directors (currently Mr. Calarco, Chair, Mr. Del Giudice, Mr. Killian, Mr. Ranger, and Mr. Sutherland),Directors. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment of the independent accountants for the Company, subject to stockholder ratification at the Annual Meeting. The Audit Committee has appointed PwC as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year 2017.2019. If the appointment of PwC is not ratified, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration in the future selection of independent accountants.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the

work of the independent accountants for the Company. The Audit Committee reviews the proposed auditing andnon-audit fees and approves in advance the proposed auditing andnon-audit services associated with the Company’s retention of the independent accountants. Every five years, the Audit Committee evaluates whether it is appropriate to rotate the Company’s independent accountants and, in conjunction with mandatory rotation of the lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee is directly involved in selecting the lead engagement partner of the independent accountants. The Audit Committee meets with the Company’s management, including Con Edison of New York’s General Auditor, the General Counsel, and the Company’s independent accountants, several times a year to discuss internal controls and accounting matters, the Company’s financial statements, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, earnings press releases and the scope and results of the auditing programs of the independent accountants and of Con Edison of New York’s internal auditing department. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies, and the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards and Rule10A-3 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors of the Company has determined that each Director on the Audit Committee

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement15


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

of John F. Killian, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland is an “audit committee financial expert” as the term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Audit Committee held six meetings in 2016.2018.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, currently Michael W. Ranger, Chair, George Campbell, Jr., John F. Killian, Linda S. Sanford, and Deirdre Stanley, is composed of five independent Directors (currently Mr. Del Giudice, Chair, Mr. Calarco, Dr. Campbell, Mr. Killian,Directors. The Corporate Governance and Ms. Sanford),Nominating Committee annually evaluates each Director’s individual performance when considering whether to nominate the Director forre-election to the Board and is responsible for recommending candidates to fill vacancies on the Board. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assists with respect to the composition and size of the Board and of all Committees of the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also makes recommendations to the Board as to the compensation of Board members, as well as other corporate governance matters, including Board independence criteria and determinations and corporate governance guidelines. Additionally, the Corporate Governance and Nominating

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement17


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

All of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board of Directors consists of a substantial majority of Directors who meet the New York Stock Exchange definition of independence, as determined by the Board in accordance with the standards described in the Guidelines under “The Board of Directors—Board Members’ Independence” on pages 16 to 17.

Among its duties, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the skills and characteristics of Director candidates, as well asincluding their independence, integrity, judgment, business experience, areas of expertise and availability for service, factors relating to the composition of the Board (including its size and structure) and the Company’s principles of diversity.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has the authority under its charter to hire advisors to assist it in its decisions. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee retainsidentifies director candidates through a variety of means, including professional search firms, recommendations from members of the Board, suggestions from senior management, and submissions by the Company’s stockholders. When using a professional search firm, to assist it in identifying director candidates. The searchthe firm assists in developing criteria for potential Board members to complement the Board’s existing strengths. Based on such criteria, the firm also provides, for review and consideration, lists of potential candidates with background information. After consulting with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the firm further screens and interviews candidates as directed to determine their qualifications, interest and any

potential conflicts of interest and provides its results to the Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also considers candidates recommended by stockholders. There are no differences in the manner in which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders.stockholders versus those recommended through other means. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will make an initial determination as to whether a particular candidate meets the Company’s criteria for Board membership, and will then further consider candidates that do. Stockholder recommendations for candidates, accompanied by biographical material for evaluation, may be sent to the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company. Each recommendation should include information as to the qualifications of the candidate and should be accompanied by a written statement (presented to the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company) from the suggested candidate to the effect that the candidate is willing to serve.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has also retained Mercer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to provide information, analyses, and objective advice regarding director compensation. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee directs Mercer to: (i) assist it by providing competitive market information on the design of the director compensation program,program; (ii) advise it on the design of the director compensation program and also provide advice on the administration of the program,program; and (iii) brief it on director compensation trends among the Company’s compensation peer group and broader industry. The Board members, including the chief executive officer, consider the recommendations of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The decisions may reflect factors and considerations in addition to the information and advice provided by Mercer. All of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held four meetings in 2016.2018.

Environment, Health and Safety Committee

TheEffective December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors dissolved the Environment, Health and Safety Committee composedas a standing committee of threenon-management Directors (currently Ms. Futter, Chair, Mr. Olivera,the Board. The duties and Ms. Sanford), providesresponsibilities of the Environment, Health and Safety Committee were merged with the duties and responsibilities of the Operations Oversight Committee and a new standing committee was formed effective January 1, 2019–the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee. The Environment, Health and

16CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Safety Committee provided advice and counsel to the Company’s management on corporate environment, health and safety policies and on such other environment, health, safety, and sustainability matters as it from time to time deemed appropriate.

time-to-time deems appropriate. The Environment, Health and Safety Committee also reviewsreviewed significant issues identified by management relating to the Company’s environment, health, and safety programs and its compliance with environment, health, and safety laws and regulations, and makesmade such other reviews and recommendsrecommended to the Board such other actions as it may deemdeemed necessary or desirable to help promote sound planning by the Company with due regard to the protection of the environment, health, and safety. Additionally, the Environment, Health and Safety Committee overseesoversaw the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have beenwere identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. Immediately prior to its dissolution, the Environment, Health and Safety Committee was composed of fournon-management Directors–Ellen V. Futter, Chair, William J. Mulrow, Linda S. Sanford, and Deirdre Stanley. The Environment, Health and Safety Committee held four meetings in 2016.2018.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee, composed of Mr.currently John McAvoy, Chair, and three independentfour Directors (currently Mr. Calarco, Dr.(three of whom are independent), George Campbell, Jr., Ellen V. Futter, John F. Killian, and Mr. Del Giudice),Michael W. Ranger, may exercise, during intervals between the meetings of the Board, all the powers vested in the Board, except for certain specified matters. No meetings of the Executive Committee were held in 2016.2018.

18CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee, currently L. Frederick Sutherland, Chair, William J. Mulrow, Armando J. Olivera, Michael W. Ranger, and Linda S. Sanford, is composed of fourfive independent Directors (currently Mr. Sutherland, Chair, Mr. Olivera, Mr. Ranger, and Ms. Sanford),Directors. The Finance Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s financial condition and policies, capital and operating budgets, financial forecasts, major contracts and real estate transactions, financings, investments, bank credit arrangements, its dividend policy, strategic business plan, litigation, and other financial matters. Additionally, the Finance Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks, relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Finance Committee held nine meetings in 2016.2018.

Management Development and Compensation Committee

The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), currently George Campbell, Jr., Chair, John F. Killian, William J. Mulrow, Michael W. Ranger, and L. Frederick Sutherland, is composed of five independent Directors (currently Dr. Campbell, Chair, Mr. Calarco, Mr. Del Giudice, Mr. Killian, and Mr. Sutherland),Directors. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board relating to officer and senior management appointments. The Compensation Committee also establishes and oversees the Company’s executive compensation and welfare benefit plans and policies, administers its equity plans and annual incentive plan and reviews and approves annually all compensation relating to the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s executive compensation program.program, with the exception of the salary of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange & Rockland which is approved by the Board of Directors of Orange & Rockland. Additionally, the Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks, relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program.

The Compensation Committee has the authority, under its charter, to engage the services of outside advisors, experts, and others to assist it. The Compensation Committee engages Mercer to provide information, analyses, and objective advice regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee directs Mercer to: (i) assist it in the development and assessment of the compensation peer group for the purposes of providing competitive market information for the design of the executive compensation program,program; (ii) compare the Company’s chief executive officer’s base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation to that of the chief executive officers of the identified compensation peer group and broader industry,industry; (iii) advise it on the officers’ base salaries and target award levels within the annual and long-term incentive plans,plans; (iv) advise it on the design of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive plans and on the

administration of the plans,plans; (v) brief it on executive compensation trends among the Company’s compensation peer group and broader industry,industry; and (vi) assist with the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee held threefive meetings in 20162018 and Mercer attended allthree meetings.

For a discussion of the role of the Compensation Committee and information about the Company’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 27.28.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement17


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

In addition, the Compensation Committee also reviews and makes recommendations as necessary to provide for orderly succession and transition in the senior management of the Company and receives reports and makes recommendations with respect to minority and female recruitment, employment and promotion.

The Compensation Committee also oversees and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), and reviews and makes recommendations with respect to benefit plans and plan amendments, the selection of plan trustees and the funding policy and contributions to the funded plans, and reviews the performance of the funded plans.

Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is “independent,” as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards under Rule10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and meets the “outside director” criteria of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the“Non-Employee” Director criteria of Rule16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Operations Oversight Committee

Effective December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors dissolved the Operations Oversight Committee as a standing committee of the Board. The duties and responsibilities of the Operations Oversight Committee were merged with the duties and responsibilities of the Environment, Health and Safety Committee and a new standing committee was formed effective January 1, 2019–the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee. The Operations Oversight Committee composed of fournon-management Directors (currently Mr. Ranger, Chair, Dr. Campbell, Ms. Futter, and Mr. Olivera), overseesoversaw the Company’s efforts relating to the Company’s operating systems and their impact on the customer. The Operations Oversight Committee also reviewsreviewed significant issues identified by the Company relating to the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems and their impact on the customer. The Operations Oversight Committee also reviewsreviewed the compliance of the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems with laws and regulations and the Company’s corporate policies and procedures, as may beit deemed necessary or appropriate. Additionally, the Operations Oversight Committee oversaw the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that were identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. Immediately prior to its dissolution, the Operations Oversight Committee was composed of fournon-management Directors–Armando J. Olivera, Chair, George Campbell,

Jr., Ellen V. Futter, and Deirdre Stanley. The Operations Oversight Committee held four meetings in 2018.

Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee

Effective January 1, 2019, the Board of Directors established the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee as a standing committee of the Board. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee, currently Ellen V. Futter,Co-Chair, Armando J. Olivera,Co-Chair, George Campbell, Jr., William J. Mulrow, and Deirdre Stanley, is composed of fivenon-management Directors. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee oversees the Company’s efforts relating to corporate responsibility and sustainability, which includes operating in a safe, environmentally sensitive and socially responsible manner, guarding the health and safety of Company employees and the public, supporting the development and success of Company employees, delivering value to customers and fostering growth to meet the expectations of investors. The Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee reviews significant issues identified by the Company relating to: (i) the Company’s subsidiaries’ environment, health, and safety programs and their compliance with environment, health, and safety laws and regulations, and the Company’s corporate environment, health, and safety policies and procedures, as may be necessary or appropriate; (ii) the Company’s subsidiaries’ operating systems, the operating systems’ impact on the customer, and the operating systems’ compliance with laws and regulations and the Company’s corporate policies and procedures, as may be necessary or appropriate; and (iii) the Company’s subsidiaries’ sustainability priorities, initiatives, and strategies. Additionally, the Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee oversees the Company’s management of risks relating to its duties and responsibilities that have been identified through the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Operations Oversight Committee held four meetings in 2016.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement19


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

COMPENSATION CONSULTANT DISCLOSURE

The Compensation Committee has retained Mercer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to assist with its responsibilities related to the Company’s executive compensation programs and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has retained Mercer to assist with its responsibilities related to the director compensation program, including the design and structure of the Company’s long term incentive plan. Mercer’s fees for

18CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

executive and director compensation consulting to the committees in 20162018 were approximately $810,500.$510,340.

During 2016,2018, the Company retained Marsh & McLennan affiliates (other than Mercer) to provide services, unrelated to executive compensation. These services were approved by the Company’s management. The aggregate fees paid for these other services, which include insurance fees and auction services, compensation planning surveys, and employee benefit guides, were approximately $102,500.$45,050.

The Compensation Committee considered the independence of Mercer under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Compensation Committee concluded that the services provided by the Marsh & McLennan affiliates (other than Mercer) did not raise any conflicts of interest and did not impair Mercer’s ability to provide independent advice to the Compensation Committee concerning executive or director compensation matters.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Mr. Calarco, Dr.George Campbell, Jr. (Chair), Mr. Del Giudice, Mr.John F. Killian, William J. Mulrow, Michael W. Ranger, and Mr.L. Frederick Sutherland were on the Company’s Compensation Committee during 2016.2018. The Company believes that there are no interlocks with the members who serve onof the Compensation Committee.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Interested parties may communicate directly with the members of the Company’s Board of Directors, including thenon-management Directors as a group, by writing to them, care of the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Secretary, at the Company’s principal executive office at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003. The Vice President and Corporate Secretary will forward communications to the Director or the Directors indicated.

 

 

20CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement19


LOGOLOGO  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

 

OVERVIEW

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews director compensationbi-annually. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers information, analyses, and objective advice regarding director compensation provided by Mercer. Director compensation is assessed relative to the Company’s compensation peer group (the same group used to evaluate executive compensation), general industry trends, and the total cost of governance. The Board reviews the recommendations of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee when determining whether changes, if any, will be made.

In February 2018, as part of its review of Director compensation, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requested that Mercer conduct anin-depth analysis of each element of compensation and the compensation program structure relative to the compensation peer group. Mercer’s review found that Committee member meeting fees were on the decline for the assessment group as companies focused more on compensating Directors for their expertise than their time. Following the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, effective April 1, 2018, the Board approved the elimination of Committee member meeting fees and an increase to the stock ownership guidelines. Certain retainers and the value of the annual equity award were increased to replace the Committee member meeting fees.

In November 2018, the Board dissolved two committees effective December 31, 2018 and established a new committee effective January 1, 2019. In connection with these committee changes, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requested that Mercer conduct a second, limited analysis of committee chair retainers relative to the compensation peer group. Mercer’s review found that the amount of the retainer provided to the Chair of the Finance Committee was below the median paid tonon-employee directors in the assessment group. Following the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, effective January 1, 2019, the Board approved an annual retainer for the Chair of the newly established Safety, Environment, Operations and Sustainability Committee of $15,000 (or $7,500 for eachCo-Chair) and an increase to the annual retainer for the Chair of the Finance Committee to $15,000 (from $5,000). Compensation for individual Directors approximates the median of compensation for Directors in similar positions at the compensation peer group.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

In 2016,2018,non-employee Directors were eligible to receive the following:

 

   Amount 

Annual Retainer(1)

  $100,000 

Lead Director Retainer

  $35,000 

Chair of Audit Committee Retainer

  $25,000 

Member of Audit Committee Retainer (excluding the Audit Committee Chair)

  $10,000 

Chair of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Retainer

  $10,000 

Chair of Management Development and Compensation Committee Retainer

  $15,000 

Retainer for Chairs of: Environment, Health and Safety Committee; Finance Committee; and Operations Oversight Committee

  $5,000 

Acting Committee Chair Fee (where the regular Chair is absent)

  $200 

Audit Committee member fee (for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended)

  $2,000 

Committee member fee (for each Committee meeting attended)

  $1,500 

Annual equity award (deferred stock units)(2)

  $135,000 

Amount

($)

Annual Retainer(1)

115,000

Lead Director Retainer

35,000

Chair of Audit Committee Retainer(2)

30,000

Member of Audit Committee Retainer (excluding the Audit Committee Chair)(3)

15,000

Chair of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Retainer(4)

15,000

Chair of Management Development and Compensation Committee Retainer

15,000

Retainer for Chairs of: Environment, Health and Safety Committee; Finance Committee; and Operations Oversight Committee

5,000

Acting Committee Chair Fee (where the regular Chair is absent)

200

Audit Committee member fee (for each meeting of the Audit Committee attended)(5)

2,000

Committee member meeting fee (for each Committee meeting attended)(5)

1,500

Annual equity award (deferred stock units)(6)

150,000

Footnotes:

(1) Effective April 1, 2016,2018, the annual retainer was increased from $90,000$100,000 to $100,000.$115,000.
(2) Effective April 1, 2016,2018, the annual retainer for the Chair of the Audit Committee was increased from $25,000 to $30,000.
(3)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the members of the Audit Committee (excluding the Chair of the Audit Committee) was increased from $10,000 to $15,000.
(4)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual retainer for the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was increased from $10,000 to $15,000.
(5)Effective April 1, 2018, all Committee member meeting fees were eliminated.
(6)Effective April 1, 2018, the annual equity award was increased from $120,000$135,000 to $135,000.$150,000.

In 2016,2018, the Company reimbursednon-employee Directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.

No person who served on both the Company Board and on the Board of its subsidiary, Con Edison of New York, and corresponding Committees, was paid additional compensation for concurrent service. Directors who are employees of the

20CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGODIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Company or its subsidiaries do not receive retainers, meeting fees, or annual equity awards for their service on the Board.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Company has stock ownership guidelines fornon-employee Directors under which provide that, within five years of joining the Board, each Director isshould own, and continue to ownhold during his or her tenure on the Board, shares (including stock equivalents and restricted stock units) with a value (measured at the time the shares are acquired) equal to five times (increased in 2018 from four timestimes) the annual director retainer (not including committee and/or committee chair fees) paid to such Director during the previous fiscal year. As of December 31, 2018, all Directors have either exceeded their stock ownership guideline requirement or are making satisfactory progress towards meeting the requirement.

LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Non-employee Directors participate in the Company’s long term incentive plan. Pursuant to the long term incentive plan, eachnon-employee Director then serving was allocated an annual equity award of $135,000$150,000 of deferred stock units on the first business day following the 20162018 Annual Meeting.Meeting (increased from $135,000 effective April 1, 2018). If anon-employee Director is first appointed to the Board after an annual meeting, his or her first annual equity award will be pro rated. prorated.

Settlement of the 20162018 annual equity awards of stock units was automatically deferred until the Director’s termination of service from the Board of Directors. Eachnon-employee Director may elect to receive some or all of his or her 2016 2018

annual equity awards of stock units on another date or to further defer any other prior annual equity award of stock units, including any related dividend equivalents earned on such prior annual equity awardawards of stock units.

Eachnon-employee Director may also elect to defer all or a portion of his or her 20162018 retainers and meeting fees into additional deferred stock units, which are deferred until the Director’s termination of service.

Dividend equivalents are payable on 20162018 deferred stock units in the amount and at the time that dividends are paid on Company Common Stock and are credited in the form of additional deferred stock units which are fully vested as of the date the dividends would have been paid to the Director or, at the Director’s option, are paid in cash.

All payments on account of deferred stock units will be made in shares of Company Common Stock. The long term incentive plan provides that cash compensation deferred into stock units, annual stock unitequity awards, and dividend equivalents granted tonon-employee Directors that are credited in the form of additional deferred stock units, are fully vested, and payable in a singleone-time payment of whole shares (rounded to the nearest whole share) within 60 days following separation from Board service, unless the directorDirector elected to defer distribution to another date.

STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Directors are eligible to participate in the stock purchase plan, which is described in Note M to the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  21


LOGOLOGO  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation for the members of the Company’s Board of Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

Stock
Awards(1)
All Other
Compensation(2)
Total
Name  

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

($)

   Stock
Awards(1)
($)
   All Other
Compensation(2)
($)
 

Total

($)

 ($)($)($)($)

Vincent A. Calarco

  $148,200   $135,000    —    $283,200 

Vincent A. Calarco(3)

 58,066   —   —   58,066

George Campbell, Jr.

  $132,000   $135,000   $5,000(3)  $272,000  132,250   150,000 5,000(4)  287,250

Michael J. Del Giudice

  $176,000   $135,000    —    $311,000 

Michael J. Del Giudice(3)

 7,682   —   —   7,682

Ellen V. Futter

  $116,000   $135,000   $5,000  $256,000  119,250   150,000 5,000 274,250

John F. Killian

  $133,000   $135,000    —    $268,000  140,689   150,000 —   290,689

John McAvoy(4)

   —      —      —     —   

John McAvoy(5)

 —     —   —   —  

William J. Mulrow

 115,750   150,000 10,000(4)  275,750

Armando J. Olivera

  $120,000   $135,000   $5,000  $260,000  131,690   150,000 —   281,690

Michael W. Ranger

  $144,000   $135,000    —    $279,000  179,750   150,000 —   329,750

Linda S. Sanford

  $120,000   $135,000    —    $255,000  117,250   150,000 —   267,250

Deirdre Stanley

 117,250   150,000 —   267,250

L. Frederick Sutherland

  $142,500   $135,000    —    $277,500  135,000   150,000 —   285,000

Footnotes:Footnotes:

(1) On May 17, 2016,22, 2018, each of thenon-employee Directors elected at the 20162018 Annual Meeting except Mr. McAvoy, received a grant of 1,8242,031 stock units valued at $74.01$73.84 per share, the equivalent of $135,000.$150,000. The stock units were fully vested at the time of grant. Pursuant to the Company’s long term incentive plan, and as indicated in Note Mto the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the stock units are valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate number of stock units for eachnon-employee director as of December 31, 20162018 is as follows: Mr. Calarco—33,698;0; Dr. Campbell—33,421;38,277; Mr. Del Giudice—44,824;1,664; Ms. Futter—29,130;32,857; Mr. Killian—19,961;24,571; Mr. Olivera—6,978;Mulrow—2,888; Mr. Olivera—11,369; Mr. Ranger—41,885;53,020; Ms. Sanford—4,611;8,832; Ms. Stanley—4,583, and Mr. Sutherland—43,271.53,956.
(2) The “All Other Compensation” column includes matching contributions made by the Company to qualified institutions under its matching gift program. All directors and employees are eligible to participate in this program. Under the Company’s matching gift program, the Company matches up to a total of $5,000 per eligible participant on aone-for-one basis to qualified institutions per calendar year.
(3) Messrs. Calarco and Del Giudice served as members of the Board of Directors until May 21, 2018 and January 18, 2018, respectively.
(4)The amounts reported in the “All Other Compensation” column include amounts matched by the Company in 2015at the end of 2017 and paid in 20162018 under the Company’s matching gift program.
(4)(5) Mr. McAvoy did not receive any director compensation because he is an employee of the Company.

 

22 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  STOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

 

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table provides, as of February 28, 2017,2019, the amount of shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by each Director, each Named Executive Officer, and by all Directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and information about the amount of their other Company equity-based holdings.

 

Name  Shares  Beneficially
Owned(1)
     Other Equity-Based
Holdings(2)
     Total(3) Shares  Beneficially
Owned(1)
Other Equity-Based
Holdings(2)
Total(3)

Vincent A. Calarco

   34,098      —        34,098 
Name(#)(#)(#)
 —     —     —    

George Campbell, Jr.

   26,231      11,900      38,131  28,416   13,911   42,327  

Michael J. Del Giudice

   42,882      1,942      44,824 

Michael J. Del Giudice(5)

 —     1,665   1,665  

Ellen V. Futter

   23,752      7,724      31,476  27,479   7,724   35,203  

John F. Killian

   12,504      7,457      19,961  15,290   9,281   24,571  

William J. Mulrow

 —     2,888   2,888  

Armando J. Olivera

   7,478      —        7,478  11,869   —     11,869  

Michael W. Ranger

   41,885      —        41,885  53,020   —     53,020  

Linda S. Sanford

   6,111      —        6,111  11,232   —     11,232  

Deirdre Stanley

 —     4,583   4,583  

L. Frederick Sutherland

   40,634      6,637      47,271  50,917   7,039   57,956  

John McAvoy

   6,974      113,480      120,454  8,439   120,685   129,124  

Robert Hoglund

   7,669      30,000      37,669  9,007   30,000   39,007  

Craig Ivey

   66      35,306      35,372 

Timothy P. Cawley

 2,905   11,618   14,523  

Elizabeth D. Moore

   2,022      35,331      37,353  2,876   37,879   40,755  

Timothy P. Cawley

   2,441      10,918      13,359 
Directors and Executive Officers as a group, including theabove-named persons (22 persons)   276,931      328,940      605,871 

Robert Sanchez

 2,567   —     2,567  
Directors and Executive Officers as a group, including the above-named persons (24 persons) 245,829   323,864   569,693  

Footnotes:Footnotes:

(1) The number of shares shown includes shares of Company Common Stock that are individually or jointly owned, as well as shares over which the individual has sole or shared investment or sole or shared voting power. The number of shares shown also includes vested stock units, as to which the individual may obtain investment or voting power within 60 days following separation from service: Mr. Calarco—33,698;0; Dr. Campbell—21,521;24,366; Mr. Del Giudice—42,882;0; Ms. Futter—21,406;25,133; Mr. Killian—12,504;15,290; Mr. Olivera—6,978;Mulrow—0; Mr. Olivera—11,369; Mr. Ranger—41,885;53,020; Ms. Sanford—4,611;8,832; Ms. Stanley—0; Mr. Sutherland—36,634;46,917; Mr. McAvoy—0; Mr. Hoglund—0; Mr. Ivey—Cawley—0; Ms. Moore—0; Mr. Cawley—Sanchez—0; and directors and executive officers as a group—222,119.184,927.
(2) Represents vested stock units, as to which the individual may not, within 60 days after February 28, 2017,2019, obtain investment or voting power.
(3) As of February 28, 2017,2019, ownership was, in each case, less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding 305,111,726321,141,148 shares.
(4)Mr. Calarco retired effective May 21, 2018. On May 25, 2018, the Company distributed 36,918 shares of Company Common Stock to Mr. Calarco pursuant to his deferral elections under the long term incentive plan.
(5)Mr. Del Giudice retired effective January 18, 2018. On January 19, 2018, the Company distributed 45,817 shares of Company Common Stock to Mr. Del Giudice pursuant to his deferral elections under the long term incentive plan.

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  23


LOGOLOGO  STOCK OWNERSHIP AND SECTION 16 COMPLIANCE

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2016,2018, with respect to persons who are known to the Company to beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of Company Common Stock.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerShares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Percent of Class

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

23,779,520(1)7.80

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

20,578,607(2)6.75

State Street Corporation

State Street Financial Center

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

19,888,106(3)6.53
  Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
  Percent of Class 
  (#)  (%)

 BlackRock, Inc.

 55 East 52nd Street

 New York, NY 10055

    28,920,573(1)     9.30

 The Vanguard Group

 100 Vanguard Blvd.

 Malvern, PA 19355

    25,320,457(2)     7.78

 State Street Corporation

 State Street Financial Center

 One Lincoln Street

 Boston, MA 02111

    19,208,542(3)     6.20

Footnotes:

(1) BlackRock, Inc. stated in its Schedule 13G/A, filed on January 23, 2017February 4, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has sole voting power for 20,201,08624,797,804 of these shares and sole dispositive power for 23,779,52028,920,573 of these shares.
(2) The Vanguard Group stated in its Schedule 13G/A, filed on February 10, 201711, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has sole voting power for 518,089419,553 of these shares, shared voting power for 86,464219,083 of these shares, sole dispositive power for 20,013,48924,749,579 of these shares, and shared dispositive power for 565,118570,878 of these shares.
(3) State Street Corporation stated in its Schedule 13G, filed on February 9, 201714, 2019 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it has shared voting power for 17,509,208 of these shares and shared dispositive power for all19,204,187 of these shares.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Directors and executive officers of the Company to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the equity securities of the Company and its subsidiaries with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish copies of these reports to the Company, within specified time limits. Based upon its review of the reports furnished to the Company for 20162018 pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Act, the Company believes that all of the reports were filed on a timely basis, except for one transaction, which was reported late for Joseph P. Oates, relating to the acquisition of 308 shares of Company Common Stock before he was required to file Section 16(a) reports.basis.

 

24 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGORATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS RATIFICATION

PROPOSAL NO. 2    RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

At the Annual Meeting, as a matter of sound corporate governance, stockholders will be asked to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as independent accountants for the Company for 2019. If the appointment of PwC is not ratified, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration in the future appointment of independent accountants.

PwC has acted as independent accountants for the Company for many years. The Audit Committee considered PwC’s qualifications in determining whether to appoint PwC as independent accountants for 2019. The Audit Committee reviewed PwC’s performance, as well as PwC’s reputation for integrity and for competence in the fields of accounting and

auditing. The Audit Committee also reviewed a report provided by PwC regarding its quality controls, inquiries or investigations by governmental or professional authorities and independence. (See “Audit Committee Matters” on page 26.) Based on this review, the Audit Committee believes that the appointment of PwC as independent accountants for the Company for 2019 is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting and will be afforded the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board Recommends a Vote FOR Proposal No. 2.


Ratification of Proposal No. 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy. Abstentions are voted neither “for” nor “against,” and have no effect on the vote. Brokernon-votes are voted “for” the proposal.


CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement25


LOGO  AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

 

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

 

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Company’s Audit Committee consistedis composed of five independent Directors in 2016. Each memberdirectors, all of the Audit Committee meetswhom meet the qualifications required by the New York Stock Exchange and Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission, and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that is available on the Company’s website.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The Audit Committee has also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), the Company’s independent registered public accountants, the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PwC’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee has discussed with PwC its independence and qualifications. The Audit Committee also considered whether PwC’s provision of limited tax andnon-audit services to the Company is compatible with PwC’s independence and concluded that it was.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee:

Vincent A. Calarco (Chair)

Michael J. Del Giudice

John F. Killian (Chair)

Armando J. Olivera

Michael W. Ranger

Linda S. Sanford

L. Frederick Sutherland

FEES PAID TO PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Fees paid or payable to PwC for services related to 20162018 and 20152017 are as follows:

 

   2016   2015 

Audit Fees

  $5,285,173   $4,992,800 

Audit-Related Fees(a)

  $1,053,925   $369,002 

Tax Fees(b)

  $25,000   $75,088 

All Other Fees

  $0   $102,867(c) 

TOTAL FEES

  $6,364,098   $5,539,757 
   2018   2017 
  ($)   ($) 

  Audit Fees

   6,207,045    5,400,697 

  Audit-Related Fees(a)

   1,432,228    1,487,246 

  TOTAL

   7,639,273    6,887,943 

Footnote:Footnote:

(a) Relates to assurance and related service fees that are reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit or quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements that are not specifically deemed “Audit Services.” The major items included in Audit-Related Fees in 20162018 and 2017 are fees for reviews of system implementations and internal controls of the Company’s regulated entities and fees for audits of various solar projects of the Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc.’s various solar projects. The major items included in Audit-Related Fees in 2015 are fees for audits of Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc.’s various solar projects.
(b)Relates to fees for tax compliance reporting relating to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act.
(c)Relates to fees in 2015 for cybersecurity risk review.Businesses.

The Audit Committee, or as delegated by the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Committee, approves in advance each auditing service andnon-audit service permitted by applicable laws and regulations, including tax services, to be provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by its independent accountants.

 

 

26CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement25


LOGOLOGO  ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTADVISORY VOTE

 

PROPOSAL NO. 3    ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 

The Company values the opinions of its stockholders, and in accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the stockholders have the opportunity to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers (commonly referred to as a “say on pay” vote) as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this Proxy Statement, the related compensation disclosure tables, and the narrative discussion that accompanies the compensation disclosure tables on pages 28 to 61. The Company currently conducts such votes annually. The Board recommends that the stockholders vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. In 2018, the Company held a say on pay vote and 93.95% of the shares voted were voted “for” the proposal. Following this year’s say on pay vote, the next such vote will be at the Company’s 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.

As discussed in the CD&A, the Company’s executive compensation program is designed to assist in attracting and retaining key executives critical to its long-term success, to motivate these executives to create value for its stockholders, and to provide safe, reliable, and efficient service for its customers. The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, seeks to provide base salary and performance-based compensation, including target annual cash incentive compensation and target long-term equity-based incentive compensation, that are competitive with the median level of compensation provided by the Company’s compensation peer group to effectively link pay with performance.

The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based compensation should represent the most significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s target total direct compensation and that most of the Boardperformance-based compensation should be in the form of Directorslong-term, rather than annual incentives, to emphasize the importance of sustained Company performance. Each year, the Compensation Committee evaluates the level of compensation, the mix of base salary, performance-based compensation and retirement and welfare benefits provided to each Named Executive Officer.

The Compensation Committee chooses performance goals under the annual incentive plan and the long term incentive plan to support the Company’s short- and long-term business plans and strategies. In setting targets for the short- and long-term performance goals, the Compensation Committee considers the Company’s annual and long-term business plans and certain other factors, includingpay-for-performance alignment, economic and industry conditions, and the practices of the compensation peer group. The Compensation Committee sets challenging, but achievable, goals for the Company has reviewed and its executives to drive the achievement of short- and long-term objectives.

For the reasons indicated and more fully discussed in the CD&A, the Board recommends that the stockholders vote in favor of the following advisory resolution:

“RESOLVED, That the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, (the “CD&A”) for 2016 with managementcompensation tables, and narrative discussion that accompany the compensation disclosure tables is hereby approved.”

The Board Recommends a Vote FOR Proposal No. 3.


Approval of Proposal No. 3 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company. Basedvotes cast on this reviewthe proposal at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy. Abstentions and discussion,brokernon-votes are voted neither “for” nor “against,” and have no effect on the Committee recommended tovote.

As an advisory vote, Proposal No. 3 is not binding on the Company, the Board, of Directors thator the CD&A be included inCompensation Committee. However, the Company, the Board, and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kstockholders as expressed through their vote and other communications and will consider the voting results when making future compensation decisions for the year ended December 31, 2016 and this Proxy Statement.Named Executive Officers.

Management Development and Compensation Committee:

George Campbell, Jr. (Chair)

Vincent A. Calarco

Michael J. Del Giudice

John F. Killian

L. Frederick Sutherland


 

26CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement27


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

CD&A TABLE OF CONTENTS  2728 

Introduction

   2728 

Executive Summary

   2728 

Key Features of the Executive Compensation Program

   2829 

Key Compensation Governance Practices

   2829 

Stockholder Engagement and Say on Pay

   2930 

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

   2930 

Competitive Positioning—Attraction and Retention

   2930 

Pay-for-Performance Alignment and Pay Mix

   3031 

Determining Performance Goals

   3233 

Role of Compensation Committee and Others in Determining Executive Compensation

   3233 

Compensation Committee’s Role

   3233 

Management’s Role

   3233 

Compensation Consultant’s Role

   3334 

Executive Compensation Actions

   3334 

Compensation Peer Group

   3334 

Base Salary

   3334 

Annual Incentive Compensation

   3435 

Awards

   3435 

Potential Awards

   3435 

Financial Objectives

   3435 

Operating Objectives

36

Achievement of 2016 Financial and Operating Objectives

   38 

2016Achievement of 2018 Financial and Operating Objectives

40

2018 Annual Incentive Awards

   3841 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

   3941 

Awards

   3941 

Performance-Based Equity Awards

   3941 

20162018 Performance Unit Awards

   3941 

Calculation of Payout of 20142016 Performance
Unit Awards for Messrs. McAvoy, Hoglund, and Cawley, and Ms. Moore

   4143

Calculation of Payout of 2016 Performance Unit Awards for Mr. Sanchez

45 

Retirement and Other Benefits

   4346 

Retirement Plans

   4346 

Savings Plans

   4446 

Stock Purchase Plan

   4447 

Health and Welfare Plans

   4447 

Perquisites and Personal Benefits

   4447 

Severance and Change of Control Benefits

   4548 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

   4548 

No Hedging NorAnd No Pledging

   4548 

Recoupment Policy

   4549 

Tax Deductibility of Pay

   4649 

INTRODUCTION

This section of the Proxy Statement provides an overview of the Company’s 20162018 executive compensation program (the “executive compensation program”) and an analysis of the decisions made with respect to the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (as identified by the Company under Securities and Exchange Commission rules). The executive compensation program covers the Company’s Named Executive Officers. For 2016,2018, the Company’s Named Executive Officers were:

 

John McAvoy, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Robert Hoglund, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Craig Ivey,Timothy P. Cawley, President, Con Edison of New York

 

Elizabeth D. Moore, Senior Vice President and General Counsel

 

Timothy P. Cawley,Robert Sanchez, President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to assist in attracting and retaining key executives critical to its long-term success, to motivate these executives to create value for its stockholders, and to promote safe, reliable, and efficient service for its customers. Each year, the Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) evaluates the level of compensation, the mix of base salary, performance-based compensation, and retirement and welfare benefits provided to each Named Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, seeks to align pay to performance and provide base salary and performance-based compensation,

 

 

28CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement27


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

base salary and performance-based compensation, including target annual cash incentive compensation and target long-term equity-based incentive compensation that are competitive with the median level of compensation provided by the Company’s compensation peer group companies. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives—Competitive Positioning—Attraction and Retention” on page 2930 and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Compensation Peer Group” on page 33.34.) The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based compensation should represent the most significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s target total direct compensation to motivate strong annual and multi-year Company performance.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee believes that most of the performance-based compensation should be in the form of long-term, rather than annual, incentives to emphasize the importance of sustained Company performance.

Key Features of the Executive Compensation Program

 

Type Component Objective

Performance-

Based

Compensation

 

Annual

Incentive

Compensation

 Achievement of financial and operating objectives for which the Named Executive Officers have individual and collective responsibility.
 

Long-Term

Incentive

Compensation

 Achievement, over a multi-year period, of financial and operating objectives critical to the performance of the Company’s business plans and strategies. Achievement, over a three-year period, of the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return relative to the Company’s compensation peer group companies.

Fixed &

Other Compensation

 

Base Salary,

Retirement

Programs,

Benefits and

Perquisites

 Differentiate base salary based on individual responsibility and performance. Provide retirement and other benefits that reflect the competitive practices of the industry and provide limited and specific perquisites.

Key Compensation Governance Practices

The Company is committed to maintaining strong compensation governance practices to support thepay-for-performance philosophy of the executive compensation program and align the executive compensation program with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders:

 

 

Pay Practices. The Company has no employment agreements, no golden parachute excise taxgross-ups, and no individually negotiated equity awards with special treatment upon a change of control.

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Long Term Incentive Plan:long term incentive plan: (i) prohibits the repricing of stock options or the buyout of underwater options without stockholder approval; (ii) prohibits recycling of shares for future awards except under limited circumstances; (iii) prohibits accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards, except ifunless both a change in control occurs and a participant’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and (iv) caps the maximum number of shares that may be awarded to a director, officer, or eligible employee in a calendar year.

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Mix. All Named Executive Officer long-term incentive compensation is performance-based. Based on proxy statements filed in 2016,2018, over half of the Company’s compensation peer group companies granted some form ofnon-performance-based incentive compensation to their named executive officers. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Philosophy andObjectives—Pay-for-Performance Alignment and Pay Mix” on page 30.31.)

 

 

Risk Management. The relevant features of the Company’s compensation programs that mitigate risk are:

 

 ¡ 

Annualannual and long-term incentives under the Company’s compensation programs appropriately balanced between annual and long-term financial performance goals that are tied to key goals that are expected to enhance stockholder value;

 

 ¡ 

Annualannual and long-term incentives tied to multiple performance goals to reduce undue weight on any one goal;

 

 ¡ 

Non-financialnon-financial performance factors used in determining the actual payout of annual incentive compensation as a counterbalance to financial performance goals;

 

 ¡ 

Compensationcompensation programs designed to deliver a significant portion of compensation in the form of long-term incentives, discouraging excessive focus on annual results;

 

 

28CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement29


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 ¡ 

Performance-basedperformance-based equity awards based on performance over a three-year period, focusing on sustainable performance over a three-year cycle rather than any one year; and

 

 ¡ 

Annualannual and long-term incentive plans that are subject to payment caps and Compensation Committee discretion to reduce payouts.

 

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s directors and certainsenior officers, including the Named Executive Officers, encourage a long-term commitment to the Company’s sustained performance through stock ownership. (See “Director CompensationCompensation—Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 21 and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines” on page 45.48.)

 

 

No Hedging Norand No Pledging. To encourage a long-term commitment to the Company’s sustained performance, the Company prohibitsCompany’s Hedging and Pledging Policy and Insider Trading Policy each prohibit all directors and officers, financial personnel, and certain other individuals, respectively, from shorting, hedging, and pledging Company securities or holding Company securities in a margin account.account as collateral for a loan. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—No Hedging Norand No Pledging” on page 45.48.)

 

 

Recoupment Policy. The Company’s compensation recoupment policy applies to all officers of the Company and its subsidiaries for incentive-based compensation and is intended to reduce potential risks associated with its executive compensation program and align the long-term interests of officers and stockholders. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Recoupment Policy” on page 45.49.)

Stockholder Engagement and Say on Pay

The Company believes that good corporate governance includes proactive stockholder engagement as well as acceptingproactively engages with stockholders and accepts invitations to discuss matters of interest to stockholders. Thethem. Throughout the year, the Company shareddiscussed numerous issues with the Board the feedback it received from institutional investors and stockholders following the 2016 proxy season on issues relating toincluding disclosure practices,

corporate governance, political spending and

lobbying practices, and environmental, health, and safety matters. The Company’s engagementCompany shares with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board the feedback it receives from institutional investors resulted inand stockholders. During the Board’s adoption of proxy access, which enables the stockholders of2019 engagement season, the Company engaged with seven of our largest institutional stockholders.

In 2018, the Company held its annual vote to include their own director nominees in the Company’s Proxy Statement and form of proxy along with candidates nominated by the Board, so longapprove named executive officer compensation (commonly referred to as they meet certain requirements,a “say on pay” vote), as set forth in the Company’sBy-laws.

In 2016, the Company held its annual say on pay vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation, as set forth in the 20162018 proxy statement, and 92.15%93.95% of the shares voted were voted “for” the proposal. In 2017, the Company held a stockholder vote on the frequency of future say on pay votes. Consistent with the recommendation of the Board, 85% of shares voted were voted in favor of holding annual say on pay votes. The Company intends to hold an annual say on pay vote unless stockholders advise the Company to change the frequency of the vote at the Company’s 20172023 annual meeting of stockholders.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES

The Compensation Committee’s philosophy and objectives governing the development and implementation of the executive compensation program are to provide competitive, performance-based compensation. There are no material differences in the Company’s compensation policies for each Named Executive Officer.

Competitive Positioning—Attraction and Retention

The executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain key executives critical to the Company’s long-term success. The Compensation Committee seeks to align pay to performance and provide base salary, target annual cash incentives, and target long-term equity-based incentives that are competitive with the median level of compensation provided by the Company’s compensation peer group companies. (See “Executive Compensation Actions—Compensation Peer Group” on page 33.) The Company also seeks to provide retirement and other benefits that are competitive with those provided by the industry and to provide limited and specific perquisites.

 

 

30CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement29


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

In 2016,2018, the Named Executive Officers’ target total direct compensation compared to the Company’s compensation peer group median was as follows:

 

  Company Target Compensation as a Percentage of
Compensation Peer Group Median Target
 
  Base Salary  Target Total
Cash
Compensation
(Base Salary +
Target
Annual Incentive)
  Target
Long-Term
Incentive
Compensation
  Target
Total Direct
Compensation
 
John McAvoy                
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(1)  95  100  90  94
Other Named Executive Officers (Average)(2)  109  104  113  107
  Company Target Compensation as a Percentage of
Compensation Peer Group Median Target
  Base Salary Target Total
Cash
Compensation
(Base Salary +
Target
Annual Incentive)
 Target
Long-Term
Incentive
Compensation
 

Target 

Total Direct 

Compensation 

 (%) (%) (%) (%)

  John McAvoy

  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(1)

   103   100   98   100

  Other Named Executive Officers (Average)(2)

   102   95   99   95

Footnotes:

(1) Based on comparisons of compensation for chief executive officers of each of the Company’s compensation peer group companies as disclosed in proxy statements filed in 2016.2018.
(2) Based on comparisons of compensation for functionally comparable positions at the Company’s compensation peer group companies as disclosed in proxy statements filed in 2016.2018.

(See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Compensation Peer Group” on page 34.)

 

Pay-for-Performance Alignment and Pay Mix

The executive compensation program is designed to motivate the Company’s key executives to create sustainable stockholder value and promote safe, reliable and efficient service for its customers. The Compensation Committee seeks to balance the target total direct compensation of each Named Executive Officer between base salary (fixed compensation) and annual cash incentive compensation and long-term equity-based incentive compensation (performance-based compensation).

The Compensation Committee believes that fixed compensation should recognize each Named Executive Officer’s individual responsibility and performance. The Compensation Committee believes that performance-based compensation should represent the most significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s target total direct compensation and that most of the performance-based compensation should be in the form of long-term, rather than annual, incentives to emphasize the importance of sustained Company performance.

Target annual cash incentive and target long-term equity-based incentive awards reflect the Compensation Committee’s

desired balance between these elements, relative to the base

salary paid to each Named Executive Officer. Awards under the Company’s annual incentive plan are based on the achievement of financial and operating objectives for which the Named Executive Officers have individual and collective responsibility. Awards under the Company’s long term incentive plan are based on the achievement of financial and operating objectives critical to the Company’s business plans and strategies and the achievement, over a three-year period, of the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return relative to the total shareholder return for the Company’s compensation peer group companies.

For 2016,2018, the mix of target total direct compensation for the Named Executive Officers meets the Compensation Committee’s objectives: each isobjectives by being weighted heavily toward performance-based compensation, with the largest portion delivered in long-term incentives, and theincentives. The target total direct compensation mix of the Named Executive Officers is in line with that of the Company’s compensation peer group companies (except that the Company does not providenon-performancenon-performance-based based incentive compensation). (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Compensation Peer Group” on page 34.)

 

 

30CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement31


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

The following charts illustrate the average mix of target total direct compensation for Mr. McAvoy and for chief executive officers in the Company’s compensation peer group companies for 2016:2018:

 

LOGOLOGO

The following charts illustrate the average mix of target total direct compensation for the Company’s other Named Executive Officers and other named executive officers in the Company’s compensation peer group companies for 20162018 (see footnote 2(2) to the table in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives—Competitive Positioning—Attraction and Retention” on page 30)31):

 

LOGOLOGO

 

32CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement31


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

The following charts illustrate that all Named Executive Officer long-term incentive compensation is performance-based and that, based on proxy statements filed in 2016,2018, over half of the Company’s compensation peer group companies granted some form ofnon-performance-based incentive compensation to their named executive officers:

 

LOGOLOGO LOGOLOGO

 

Determining Performance Goals

The Compensation Committee chooses performance goals under the annual incentive and long-term incentive plans to support the Company’s short- and long-term business plans and strategies. In setting the performance goals, the Compensation Committee considers the Company’s annual and long-term business plans and certain other factors, includingpay-for-performance alignment, economic and industry conditions, and the pay practices of the compensation peer group companies. The Compensation Committee sets challenging, but achievable, goals for the Company and its key executives to drive the achievement of short- and long-term objectives.

ROLE OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND OTHERS IN DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee’s Role

The role of the Compensation Committee is to establish and oversee the Company’s executive compensation and retirement and welfare benefit plans and policies, administer its equity plans and annual incentive plan and review and approve

annually all compensation relating to the Named Executive

Officers. All of the decisions with respect to determining the amount or form of compensation of the Named Executive Officers under the executive compensation program are made by the Compensation Committee.Committee with the exception of the base salary of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange & Rockland which is approved by the Board of Directors of Orange & Rockland.

Management’s Role

The role of the Company’s chief executive officer in determining the amount and form of the other NamedChief Executive Officers’ compensation is to provide recommendations to the Compensation Committee. The chief executive officer is not present when the Compensation Committee determines his compensation. The chief executive officerOfficer considers the following in making his recommendations for the other Named Executive Officers’ compensation:compensation recommendations:

 

Individual performance of each of the other Named Executive Officers;individual performance;

 

Each of the other Named Executive Officer’s contributioncontributions toward the Company’s long-term performance;

 

Thethe scope of each of the other Named Executive Officer’s individualindividual’s responsibilities; and

32CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Compensationcompensation peer group company proxy statement data provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement33


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Company’s Human Resources department also supports the Compensation Committee in its work.

Compensation Consultant’s Role

The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to hire advisors to assist it in its compensation decisions. It has retained Mercer as its independent compensation consultant to provide information, analyses, and objective advice regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee periodically meets with Mercer in executive session to discuss compensation matters. The Compensation Committee’s decisions reflect factors and considerations in addition to the information and advice provided by Mercer. A discussion of Mercer’s role as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant is set forth in the section titled “The Board of Directors—Standing Committees of the Board—Management Development and Compensation Committee” on page  19.17.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ACTIONS

Compensation Peer Group

For 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee used a compensation peer group of publicly-traded utility companies of comparable size and scope to that of the Company. The purpose of the compensation peer group is to provide benchmark information on compensation levels provided to the Company’s officers, as well as to measure relative total shareholder returns for the vesting of performance-based equity awards. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the composition of the compensation peer group companies and the impact of acquisitions. For 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee made the following changeno changes to the compensation peer group: WEC Energy Group (a company formed by the June 2015 merger between Wisconsin Energy Corporation and Intergrys Energy Group) was added because of its mix of business and size.group. The Company’s 20152017 revenues approximated the 66th51st percentile of the compensation peer group.

For 2016,2018, the Company’s compensation peer group consisted of the following companies:

 

Company Name 2015 Revenue(1) 
  (in millions) 

Duke Energy Corporation

 $23,459 

The Southern Company

 $17,489 

NextEra Energy, Inc.

 $17,486 

PG&E Corporation

 $16,833 

American Electric Power Company, Inc.

 $16,453 

FirstEnergy Corp.

 $15,031 

Dominion Resources, Inc.

 $11,683 

Edison International

 $11,524 

Entergy Corporation

 $11,513 

Xcel Energy Inc.

 $11,024 

DTE Energy Company

 $10,337 

Sempra Energy

 $10,231 

Eversource Energy

 $7,955 

PPL Corporation

 $7,669 

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

 $7,386 

Ameren Corporation

 $6,098 

WEC Energy Group, Inc.

 $5,926 

NiSource Inc.

 $4,652 

Median

 $11,269 

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

 $12,554 

Percentile Rank

  66th 
  Company Name2017  Revenue(1)
($ in millions)

  Duke Energy Corporation

23,189

  The Southern Company

23,031

  NextEra Energy, Inc.

17,195

  PG&E Corporation

17,135

  American Electric Power Company, Inc.

15,425

  FirstEnergy Corp.

13,627

  DTE Energy Company

12,607

  Dominion Energy, Inc.

12,586

  Edison International

12,320

  Xcel Energy Inc.

11,404

  Sempra Energy

11,207

  Entergy Corporation

11,074

  CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

9,614

  Eversource Energy

7,752

  WEC Energy Group, Inc.

7,649

  PPL Corporation

7,447

  Ameren Corporation

5,967

  NiSource Inc.

4,875

  Median

11,862

  Consolidated Edison, Inc.

12,033

  Percentile Rank

  51st

Footnote:Footnote:

(1) Source: Standard & Poor’s Research InsightCapital IQ (represents net revenues, restated if applicable).

For 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee made no change to the compensation peer group.

Base Salary

A portion of each Named Executive Officer’s annual cash compensation is paid in the form of base salary. Base salary is reviewed annually to recognize individual performance, as well as at the time of a promotion or other change in responsibilities.

In setting base salary for the Named Executive Officers, including the chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee, or, in the case of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange & Rockland, the Board of Directors of Orange & Rockland, considers various factors, including:

 

Recommendationsrecommendations from the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer for each of the other Named Executive Officers;

 

Aa general assessment of each Named Executive Officer’s performance of his or her responsibilities; and

 

Thethe level of base salary compared to key executives holding equivalent positions in the Company’s compensation peer group companies.

 

 

34CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement33


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Effective February 1, 2016,2018, base salary merit increases for the Named Executive Officers as a group increased by an average of 3.0%2.8%. The 20162018 base salary of each Named Executive Officer is set forth in the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 48.50. The increase in Mr. Cawley’s base salary for February 2018 also reflects his change in position from President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange & Rockland through November 1, 2017, to President of Con Edison of New York effective January 1, 2018.

Annual Incentive Compensation

Awards

A significant portion of the annual cash incentive compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers directly relates to the Company’s financial and operating performance, factors that the Compensation Committee believes influence stockholder value.

Individual performance is considered in setting annual cash incentive compensation through the establishment by the Compensation Committee of financial and operating objectives for which the Named Executive Officers have individual and collective responsibility.

Potential Awards

For 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee set the range of the award that each Named Executive Officer was eligible to receive under the annual incentive plan after considering various factors, including:

 

Recommendationsrecommendations from the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer for each of the other Named Executive Officers;

 

Aa general assessment of each Named Executive Officer’s performance of his or her responsibilities; and

 

 

Thethe level of annual incentive compensation compared to key executives in the Company’s compensation peer group companies. (See footnote 2(2) to the table in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives—Competitive Positioning—Attraction and Retention” on page 29.31.)

The range of awards included threshold, target, and maximum levels reflecting differing levels of achievement of the various financial and operating objectives. Awards are scaled to reflect relative levels of achievement of the objectives between the threshold, target, and maximum levels. The range of each Named Executive Officer’s potential award is set forth in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 50.52. Awards under the annual incentive plan are designed to provide a

competitive level of compensation if the Named Executive Officers achieve the target financial and operating objectives. Pursuant to the terms of the annual incentive plan, the Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust (upward or

downward) the annual incentive award to be paid to each Named Executive Officer.

Awards under the annual incentive plan are calculated as follows:

Base Salary   X   Target Percentage

   X   Weighting Earned

Target Percentage” is a percentage of Base Salary that varies based on the Named Executive Officer’s position as follows:

 

   Target Percentage
 (%)

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

   125125  

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

   5050  

Craig IveyTimothy P. Cawley

President, Con Edison of New York

   8080  

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and

General Counsel

   5050  

Timothy P. CawleyRobert Sanchez

President and Chief Executive Officer,

Orange & Rockland

   8080  

Weighting Earned” is the sum of the target weightings earned for the following components: adjusted net income, other financial performance, and operating objectives. Forobjectives, including any adjustments (upward or downward) as a result of performance relative to target. Target weightings for each Named Executive Officer target weightings, totalingtotal 100%, and are assigned for each component as follows: 50% forcomprised of three components: adjusted net income 20%(50%), other financial performance (25%), and operating objectives (25%). As a result of performance relative to target, the weightings earned can vary from (a) zero to 200% for (i) adjusted net income, (ii) operating objectives, and (iii) the operating budget component of other financial performance, and 30% for operating objectives. For 2017, target weightings for adjusted net income will be 50%, other financial performance will be increased to 25%, and operating objectives will be decreased to 25%. The change in target weightings reflects the importance of the Company’s financial objectives in driving performance. Weightings earned vary from(b) zero to 200% for adjusted net income and other financial performance, and from zero to 175% for operating objectives, reflecting achievement of the applicable objectives. For 2017, weightings earned for operating objectives will vary from zero to 200%. This increase in weightings is competitive with practices at the companies in the compensation peer group. In addition, for 2017, weightings earned120% for the capital budget component of other financial performance will be reduced from 200% to 120%.performance.

Financial Objectives

The financial objectives under the annual incentive plan are key performance measures that support the Company’s short- and long-term business plans and strategies and create value

34CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

for the Company’s stockholders. For 2016,2018, the financial objectives consisted of “adjusted net income” and “other financial performance” components.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement35


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The “adjusted net income” component, reflecting the financial results of the Company’s business for which its Named Executive Officers are responsible and accounting for 50% of each Named Executive Officer’s potential annual incentive award, as shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38,40, was comprised of “Adjusted Company Net Income” and “Adjusted Regulated Net Income.”

Adjusted Company Net Incomeis the Company’s net income as reported under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the Company’s financial statements excluding the impact of certain items. (See footnote (1) to the following table.)andAdjusted Regulated Net Incomeis net income as reported under GAAP inare the financial statements ofCompany’s, Con Edison of New YorkYork’s, and Orange & Rockland.Rockland’s net income from ongoing operations, as applicable, after subtracting all expenses incurred, including federal and state income taxes. Adjusted Company Net Income and Adjusted Regulated Net Income each exclude (i) extraordinarynon-recurring items identified after the applicable net income target is established, and (ii) the impact ofmark-to-market activity and any gain or loss on sale of assets. Adjusted Company Net Income and Adjusted Regulated Net Income are net of the reserve that is established for the target annual incentive awards during theyear-end closing. (See footnotes to the following table.) Information on how the Company calculates adjusted net income is disclosed in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measure” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

For 2016,2018, target adjusted net income and actual adjusted net income were as follows:

 

 Target Actual Performance
Relative to
Target
  Target Actual 

Performance

Relative to

Target

 Payout
Relative to
Target
 (in millions)    ($ in millions) (%) (%)

Adjusted Company Net Income

 $1,150  $1,189.2(1)   103.4  1,324  1,349(1)   101.9    119  

Adjusted Regulated Net Income

 $1,123  $1,115.3   99.3  1,226  1,255  102.4    124  

Adjusted Con Edison of New York Net Income

 $1,063  $1,056.1   99.4  1,167  1,196  102.5    125  

Adjusted Orange & Rockland Net Income

 $60  $59.2   98.7  59  59  100.0    100  

Footnote:Footnote:

(1) Excludes the income tax effect of the Tax Cuts and Job Act, the Clean Energy Businesses’ net gain on their acquisition of Sempra Solar Holdings, LLC and netmark-to-marketeffects of the gain on the sale of Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc.’s retail supply businesses, the goodwill impairment related to its energy service business and its netmark-to-market effects. Also reflects the timing of the sale as compared to target.Businesses.

If actual adjusted net income for 20162018 had been less than 90% of the target adjusted net income, no annual incentive awards would have been made.

The weightings earned for the 50% “adjusted net income” component were determined based on the following scale:

 

Performance
Relative to
Performance
Goal
 Weighting Earned(1) Payout
Relative to
Target

³ 110%

 

100%

 

200%

(Target) 100%

 

  50%

 

100%

< 90%

 

    0%

 

    0%

Performance
Relative to
Target
 Weighting Earned(1) Payout
Relative to
Target
(%) (%) (%)

³ 110

 

100

 

200

(Target) 100

 

  50

 

100

< 90

 

    0

 

    0

Footnote:

(1) The weightings earned, which were interpolated for actual performance between performance goals,targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual IncentiveCompensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38.40.

The “other financial performance” component, reflecting the Company’s business for which its Named Executive Officers are responsible and accounting for 20%25% of each Named Executive Officer’s potential annual incentive award, as shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38,40, was comprised of one or more of the Con Edison of New York, and Orange & Rockland, budgets, or objectives for Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Clean(“Clean Energy Businesses,” which were formerly referred to as the competitive energy businesses) relating to compliance with financial reporting requirements, level of bad debt,Businesses”), and financial risk exposure. For 2017, “other financial performance” will account for 25% of each Named Executive Officer’s potential annual incentive award. The change in target weightings reflects the importance of the Company’s financial objectives in driving performance.Con Edison Transmission, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Con Edison Transmission”) budgets.

Con Edison of New York’s “other financial performance” component is allocated 10% for capital budget performance and up to 10% for operating budget performance (up to 15% for operating budget performance, in 2017), subject to a maximum 25% upward or downward adjustment based on the achievement ofpre-established targets for 25 capital projects and 12 operating and maintenance programs, respectively. The targets for the capital projects consist of completing milestones within specified budget targets, and, for the operating and maintenance programs, completing a number of units within specified per unit budget targets. Orange & Rockland’s and the Clean Energy Businesses’ “other financial performance” component is up to 20% (up to 25% for 2017) and up to 1%, respectively.

 

 

36CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement35


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

The target budgets and actual expenditures for 20162018 were as follows:

 

   

Target

(in millions)

   Actual
(in millions)
   Performance
Relative to
Target
 

Con Edison of
New York

               

Operating Budget

  $1,505.0   $1,477.3    98.2

Capital Budget

  $2,776.9   $2,702.2    97.3

Orange &
Rockland

               

Operating Budget

  $205.1   $197.2    96.1

  Target Actual 

Performance

Relative to

Target

 Payout
Relative to
Target
  ($ in millions) (%) (%)

Con Edison of New York

 

               

Operating Budget

   1,544   1,553   100.6     100  

Capital Budget

   3,008   3,002   99.8     115  

Orange & Rockland

                    

Operating Budget

   204   198.1   97.1     119  

Clean Energy Businesses

 

               

Operating Budget

   100   101.6   101.6     94  

Con Edison Transmission

 

               

Operating Budget

   9   7.1   78.9     200  

The weightings earned for Con Edison of New York’s andYork, Orange & Rockland’sRockland, Clean Energy Businesses, and Con Edison Transmission for the “other financial performance” component were determined based on the following scales:

 

Con
Edison of
New York

Performance
Relative to

Operating
Budget Goal

 

Weighting
Earned for

McAvoy,
Hoglund,
and
Moore(1)

 Weighting
Earned for
Ivey(1)
 Payout
Relative
to
Target

£ 89%

 16% 20% 200%

(Target)99-101%

   8% 10% 100%

³ 111%

   0%   0%     0%

Con
Edison of
New York

Performance
Relative to

Operating
Budget Target

 

Weighting
Earned for

McAvoy,
Hoglund,
and
Moore(1)

 Weighting
Earned  for
Cawley(1)
 Payout
Relative
to
Target
(%) (%) (%) (%)

£ 89

 24 30 200

(Target)
99-101

 12 15 100

³ 111

   0   0     0

Footnote:

(1)The weightings earned, which were interpolated for actual performance between performance targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 2018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 40. In 2018, Con Edison of New York achievedpre-established performance targets for 10.5 out of 12 operating and maintenance programs, as a result of which the weighting earned was not subject to any adjustment.

Con Edison of

New York

Performance
Relative to

Capital

Budget Target

 Weighting Earned for
McAvoy, Hoglund,
Cawley,
and
Moore(1)
 Payout
Relative to
Target
(%) (%) (%)

£ 89

 

12

 120

(Target) 99-101

 

10

 100

³ 111

 

  0

     0

Footnote:

(1) The weightings earned, which were interpolated for actual performance between performance goals,targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38.40. In 2016,2018, Con Edison of New York achieved 23.5 out of 25pre-established performance goalstargets for 11 out of 12 operating and maintenance programs,capital projects, as a result of which the weighting earned was subject to a 110%115% upward adjustment.

Con Edison of

New York

Performance
Relative to

Capital

Budget Target

 Weighting Earned for
McAvoy, Hoglund,
Ivey,
and
Moore(1)
 Payout
Relative to
Target

£ 89.00%

 

20%

 200%

(Target) 99-101%

 

10%

 100%

³ 110.00%

 

  0%

     0%

Orange &
Rockland

Performance
Relative

to Operating

Budget Target

 Weighting
Earned
for McAvoy,
Hoglund,
and
Moore(1)
 Weighting
Earned  for
Sanchez(1)
 Payout
Relative to
Target
(%) (%) (%) (%)
£ 89 2 50 200
(Target) 99-101 1 25 100
³ 111 0   0     0

Footnote:

(1) The weightings earned, which were interpolated for actual performance between performance goals,targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38. In 2016, Con Edison of New York achieved 24 out of 25pre-established performance goals for capital projects, as a result of which the weighting earned was subject to a 120% upward adjustment.40.

 

Orange &
Rockland

Performance
Relative

to Operating

Budget Target

 Weighting
Earned
for McAvoy,
Hoglund,
and
Moore(1)
 Weighting
Earned for
Cawley
 Payout
Relative to
Target
£ 89.00% 2% 40% 200%
(Target)99-101% 1% 20% 100%
³ 111.00% 0%   0%     0%

Clean Energy

Businesses

Performance

Relative

to Operating

Budget Target

 

Weighting

Earned

for McAvoy,

Hoglund,

and

Moore(1)

 

Payout

Relative to

Target

(%) (%) (%)

£ 89

 

2

 200

(Target) 99-101

 

1

 100

³ 111

 

0

     0

Footnote:

(1) The weightings earned, which were interpolated for actual performance between performance goals,targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38.40.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement37


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Con Edison

Transmission

Performance

Relative

to Operating

Budget Target

 

Weighting

Earned

for McAvoy,

Hoglund,

and

Moore(1)

 

Payout

Relative to

Target

(%) (%) (%)

£ 89

 

2

 200

(Target) 99-101

 

1

 100

³ 111

 

0

     0

Footnote:

(1)The weightings earned, which were interpolated for actual performance between performance targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 2018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 40.

Operating Objectives

The “operating objectives” component, reflecting the responsibilities of the Named Executive Officer and accounting for 30%25% of each Named Executive Officer’s potential annual incentive award, as shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38,40, was comprised of a number of key indicators that guide Con Edison of New York, Orange & Rockland, and the Clean Energy Businesses, and Con Edison Transmission to serve their customers in a safe, reliable, and efficient manner. Each of the operating objectives include specific,pre-established targets that encourage superior performance in multiple areas that impact theday-to-day operations of the Company’s businesses. For 2017, “operating objectives” will account2018, the operating objectives for 25% of each Named Executive Officer’s potential annual incentive award.

36CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Con Edison of New York’s andYork, Orange & Rockland’s operating objectives for 2016, each accounting for up to 30% (up to 25% in 2017),Rockland, Clean Energy Businesses, and Con Edison Transmission are shown in the following tables. Operating objectives for the Clean Energy Businesses (accounting for up to 1%) include those that are important to the success of their business: (i) renewable capacity installed; (ii) retail electric commodity volume; and (iii) employee business development objectives.

Con Edison of

New York Operating
Objectives(1)

  

Unit of

Measure

 Target  Actual 

Electric Network System Availability

      %  ³  99.999   99.999 

ElectricNon-Network System Availability

      %  ³  99.99   99.99 

Electric Reliability Performance Measure

      #  0   0 

Respond to Gas Odor Complaints within 30 Minutes

      %  ³ 75.0   89.1 

Total Gas LeakYear-End Inventory

      #  < 750   211 

Steam Operations—Normal Pressure Operations

      %  ³  99.77   100.0 

Generation Station—Forced Outages

      %  £ 4.0   1.3 

Public Service Commission Complaints

  Per
100,000
Customers
  £ 2.3   1.3 

Representative Calls Answered in 30 Seconds

      %  ³ 63.0   64.3 

Customer Satisfaction Surveys

  #—Score  ³ 85.0   91.6 

Safety Index

      %  ³ 87.5   100.0 

Environmental Index

      %  ³ 87.5   87.5 

Storm Index

      %  ³ 83.3   100.0 

Employee Development Index

      %  ³ 83.3   100.0 

Con Edison of

New York Operating
Objectives(1)

 

Unit of

Measure

 Target Actual 

Employee and Public Safety

        

Injury/Illness Incidence Rate

 Rate £ 1.1  1.32    

SignificantHigh-Hazard Injuries

     # 0  2    

Public Safety-Related Equipment Failures

     # £ 170  171    

Motor Vehicle Collisions

     # £ 299  286    

Operating Errors

     # £ 67  54    

Environment and Sustainability

      

Dielectric Fluid Released to the Environment

 Gallons £ 22,000  40,822    

Late Spill Notifications

     # £ 9  3    

SF6 Gas Emissions

 Pounds £ 9,000  7,218    

Customer Emissions (through Energy Efficiency MWh Reductions)

     # 270,000  394,348    

Customer Emissions (throughOil-to-Gas Conversions)

     # ³ 105  189    

Operational Excellence

      

Steam System Reliability

     # 2  1    

Reliability Performance Measures

     # 0  2    

Gas Made Safe Time

     % ³ 82  91.4    

Workable Gas Leak Inventory

     # £ 20  3    

Cyber Security

     # 0  0    

Physical Security

     # 0  0    

Customer Experience

        

Customer Project Completion Dates

     % ³ 90  94.0    

First Call Resolution

     % ³ 83.0  83.0    

Estimated Time for Restoration

     % ³ 57  62.3    

Customer Appointments

     % ³ 95  98.2    

Footnote:

(1) Operating objectives were weighted equally.

The weightings earned for Con Edison of New York’s “operating objectives” component were determined based on the following scales:

 

Performance

Indicators

Achieved

 

Weighting
Earned for
McAvoy,

Hoglund,
and
Moore(1)

 

Weighting

Earned
for

Ivey(1)

 Payout
Relative
to
Target

14/14

 49% 52.5% 175%

(Target) 11/14

 28%     30% 100%

< 7/14

   0%      0%    0%

Performance

Indicators

Achieved

 

Weighting
Earned for
McAvoy,

Hoglund,
and
Moore(1)

 

Weighting

Earned
for

Cawley(1)

 

Payout  

Relative  

to  

Target  

 (%) (%) (%)  

20/20

   44    50    200   

(Target) 16/20

   22    25    100   

£ 12/20

         0   

Footnote:

(1) The weightings earned, which were based on actual performance between performance goals,targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive
Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38.40. Con Edison of New York achieved 14 out of the 1420 operating objectives resulting in a weighting earned of 52.5%50% of the component target weighting.

 

Orange & Rockland
Operating Objectives(1)
 

Unit of

Measure

 Target  Actual 

Electric Service Reliability— Frequency

 Outages Per
Customer
  £ 1.20   0.99 

Electric Service Reliability— Restoration Time

 Minutes  £  115.5   106.7 

Customer Experience

     %  85.7   100 

Respond to Gas Odor Calls within 30 Minutes

     %  ³ 75.0   88.9 

Gas Leaks

          

Workable Gas Leaks
Total Gas Leaks

      #

     #

  

£ 20

£ 250

 

 

  

2

27

 

 

Damage Prevention Program

     %  ³  100.0   100 

Gas Main Replacement Program

 # of Feet  ³  110,880   123,330 

Storm Hardening / System Resiliency Projects

     %  ³ 75.0   100 

Major Capital Projects

     %  ³ 80.0   80.0 

Safety Index

     %  ³ 87.5   87.5 

Environmental Index

     %  ³ 80.0   100 

Storm Index

     %  ³ 85.7   100 

Employee Development Index

     %  ³ 83.3   100 
38CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Orange & Rockland
Operating Objectives(1)
 

Unit of

Measure

 Target  Actual 

Employee and Public Safety

          

Injury/Illness Incidence Rate

 Rate  £ 1.25   1.09 

SignificantHigh-Hazard Injuries

     #  0   0 

Motor Vehicle Collisions

     #  £ 40   55 

Operating Errors

     #  £ 28   4 

Damage Prevention

 Rate  £ 2.25   1.78 

Environment and Sustainability

          

Written Notice of Violations

     #  0   0 

Customer Emissions ( Energy Efficiency)

     #  ³ 20,265   21,704 

Gas Leak Inventory

     #  £ 40   24 

Solar Connection—

Initial Screening

Coordinated Review

     %

    %

  

³ 92

³ 80

 

 

  

100

100

 

 

Operational Excellence

          

Outage Frequency

     #  £ 1.20   1.12 

Outage Duration

     #  £ 115.5   103 

Gas Made Safe Time

     %  65   77 

Cyber Security

     #  0   0 

Physical Security

     #  0   0 

Customer Experience

          

Customer Service Performance Incentive Mechanism

    100   67 

Customer Service Appointments Kept

     %  ³ 95   96 

New Business Electric Services Energized

     %  ³92   93 

First Call Resolution

     %  ³ 82.5   86.6 

AMI Implementation

     %  100   100 

Storm Scorecard

     #  ³ 90   92 

Footnote:

(1) Operating objectives were weighted equally.

The weightings earned for Orange & Rockland’s “operating objectives” component were determined based on the following scales:

Performance

Indicators

Achieved

 Weighting
Earned for
McAvoy, Hoglund,
and Moore(1)
 

Weighting

Earned for

Sanchez(1)

 Payout
Relative to
Target
 (%) (%) (%)

20/20

 2 50 200

(Target) 16/20

 1 25 100

£ 12/20

 0   0   0

Footnote:

(1)The weightings earned, forwhich were based on actual performance between performance targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 2018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 40. Orange & Rockland’s “operating objectives”Rockland achieved 18 out of the 20 operating objectives resulting in a weighting earned of 150% of the component target weighting.
Clean Energy Businesses
Operating Objectives(1)
 

Unit of

Measure

 Target  Actual 

Injury/Illness Incident Rate

 Rate  0.9   0.8 

Renewable Portfolio Production

 GWh  3,500   3,697 

Annual Availability–Jointly Owned Projects

     %  98.5   99.3 

Retail Energy Services Profit Margin

     %  22   22 

Significant Risk Limit Violations

     #  0   0 

Material Financial Weaknesses or Significant Deficiencies and Ethical Violations

     #  0   0 

Complete Required Training

     %  100   100 

Timely Recruiting

     %  80   87 

Implement IT Strategic Plan

     #  3   3 

IT Phishing Test Performance

     %  > 80   93 

Footnote:

(1)Operating objectives were determined based on the following scales:weighted equally.

The weightings earned for Clean Energy Businesses’ “operating objectives” component were determined based on the following scales:

Performance

Indicators

Achieved

 Weighting
Earned for
McAvoy, Hoglund,
and Moore(1)
 

Weighting

Earned for

Cawley(1)

 Payout
Relative to
Target

13/13

 1.75% 52.5% 175%

(Target) 11/13

      1%    30% 100%

< 7/13

      0%      0%    0%

Performance

Indicators

Achieved

 

Weighting

Earned for

McAvoy,
Hoglund,

and Moore(1)

 

Payout

Relative to

Target

 (%) (%)

10/10

 2 200

(Target) 8/10

 1 100

£ 5/10

 0     0

Footnote:

(1) The weightings earned, which were based on actual performance between performance goals,targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 38. Orange & Rockland40. Clean Energy Businesses achieved 1310 out of the 1310 operating objectives resulting in a weighting earned of 52.5%200% of the component target weighting.
 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  3739


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Con Edison Transmission
Operating Objectives(1)
 

Unit of

Measure

 Target  

Actual

 

Injury/Illness Incident Rate

 Rate  0   1.9 

Subsurface Integrity plan

 Completion  Y   Y 

Construction Oversight Plan

 Completion  Y   Y 

NERC Violations

     #  0   0 

Operating Incidents

     #  0   0 

Late Spill Notifications

     #  1   0 

Material Financial Weaknesses or Significant Deficiencies

     #  0   0 

Ethical Violations

     #  0   0 

Hearing Conservation Program

 Completion  Y   Y 

Complete Required Training

     %  100   100 

Footnote:

(1)Operating objectives were weighted equally.

The weightings earned for Con Edison Transmission’s “operating objectives” component were determined based on the following scales:

Performance

Indicators

Achieved

 

Weighting

Earned for

McAvoy,
Hoglund,

and Moore(1)

 

Payout

Relative to

Target

 (%) (%)

10/10

 2 200

(Target) 8/10

 1 100

£ 5/10

 0     0

Footnote:

(1)The weightings earned, which were based on actual performance between performance targets, are shown on the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation—Achievement of 2018 Financial and Operating Objectives” table on page 40. Con Edison Transmission achieved 9 out of the 10 operating objectives resulting in a weighting earned of 150% of the component target weighting.

 

Achievement of 20162018 Financial and Operating Objectives

The following table shows, for each Named Executive Officer, the target weightings assigned to the financial and operating objectives and the weightings earned based on achieving those objectives.

 

  

McAvoy, Hoglund,

and Moore

   Cawley   Sanchez 
  

McAvoy, Hoglund,

and Moore

   Ivey   Cawley   Target   Earned   Target   Earned   Target   Earned 
  Target   Earned   Target   Earned   Target   Earned   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%)   (%) 

Financial Objectives

                                    

Adjusted Net Income

                                    

Adjusted Company Net Income

   50   67       —          —      50    59.5    —      —      —      —   

Adjusted Regulated Net Income

           50   46.5       —      —      —      50    62.0    —      —   

Adjusted Con Edison of New York Net Income

               —      10   9.4   —      —      —      —      10    12.5 

Adjusted Orange & Rockland Net Income

               —      40   34.8   —      —      —      —      40    40.0 

Other Financial Performance

                                    

Con Edison of New York Operating Budget

   8   9.5   10   11.9       —      12    12.0    15    15.0    —      —   

Con Edison of New York Capital Budget

   10   14   10   14       —      10    11.5    10    11.5    —      —   

Orange & Rockland Operating Budget

   1   1.3       —      20   25.8   1    1.2    —      —      25    29.7 

Clean Energy Businesses

   1   2       —          —   

Clean Energy Businesses Operating Budget

   1    0.9    —      —      —      —   

Con Edison Transmission Operating Budget

   1    2.0    —      —      —      —   

Operating Objectives

                                    

Con Edison of New York

   28   49   30   52.5       —      22    11.0    25    12.5    —      —   

Orange & Rockland

   1   1.8       —      30   52.5   1    1.5    —      —      25    37.5 

Clean Energy Businesses

   1   1.5       —          —      1    2.0    —      —      —      —   

Con Edison Transmission

   1    1.5    —      —      —      —   

Total

   100   146.1   100   124.9   100   122.5   100    103.1    100    101.0    100    119.7 

40CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

20162018 Annual Incentive Awards

In February 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee evaluated and determined whether the applicable financial and operating objectives were satisfied. In assessing performance against the objectives, the Compensation Committee considered actual results achieved against the specific targets associated with each objective and, based on the results, determined the 20162018 annual incentive awards. The Compensation Committee did not exercise discretion to adjust (upward or downward) the annual incentive award to be paid to each Named Executive Officer.

The following table shows the calculation of the 20162018 annual incentive awards for each Named Executive Officer.

 

Name & Principal Position Base
Salary
  ×  Target
Percentage
  ×  Weighting
Earned
  =  2016 Award 

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 $1,225,000       125      146.1     $2,237,200 

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 $723,000       50      146.1     $528,200 

Craig Ivey

President, Con Edison of New York

 $797,300       80      124.9     $796,600 

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

 $609,500       50      146.1     $445,300 

Timothy P. Cawley

President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

 $409,700       80      122.5     $401,500 

38CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

  Name & Principal Position Base
Salary
  ×  Target
Percentage
 ×  Weighting
Earned
 =  2018 Award 
 ($)     (%)    (%)    ($) 

  John McAvoy

  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

  1,300,000      125     103.1      1,675,400 

  Robert Hoglund

  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  767,000        50     103.1      395,400 

  Timothy P. Cawley

  President, Con Edison of New York

  612,000        80     101.0      494,500 

  Elizabeth D. Moore

  Senior Vice President and General Counsel

  646,600        50     103.1      333,300 

  Robert Sanchez

  President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

  438,600        80     119.7      420,000 

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Awards

Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive equity-based awards under the Company’s long term incentive plan. The Compensation Committee determines the target long-term incentive award value for each Named Executive Officer based on various factors, including:

 

Recommendationsrecommendations from the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer for each of the other Named Executive Officers;

 

Aa general assessment of each Named Executive Officer’s performance of his or her responsibilities; and

 

 

Thethe level of long-term incentive compensation compared to key executives in the Company’s compensation peer group companies. (See footnote 2(2) to the table in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives—Competitive Positioning—Attraction and Retention” on page 30.31.)

Performance-Based Equity Awards

It is the Compensation Committee’s practice in the first quarter of each year to approve performance-based equity awards under the long term incentive plan for the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee’s use of performance-based equity awards is intended to further reinforce the alignment of Named Executive Officer pay opportunities with

stockholders by directly linking pay to the achievement of strong, sustained long-term financial and operating performance.

The performance units awarded to Named Executive Officers provide for the right to receive one share of Company Common Stock and/or a cash payment equal to the fair market value of one share of Company Common Stock for each unit awarded, subject to the satisfaction of certainpre-established long-term performance objectives. Named Executive Officers may elect to defer the receipt of the cash value of the award into the Company’s deferred income plan and/or to defer the receipt of the shares. Dividends are not paid and do not accrue on the units during the vesting period.

20162018 Performance Unit Awards

The number of performance units awarded to the Named Executive Officers in 20162018 for the 2016-20182018–2020 performance period is shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on

page 50.52. Payouts of performance units, if any, are calculated by anon-discretionary formula as follows:

Award X 30% X Adjusted EPS Percentage

plus

Award X 20% X Operating Objectives Percentage

plus

Award X 50% X Shareholder Return Percentage

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement41


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Award” is the annual award of performance units under the long term incentive plan. The target award of performance units is a percentage of base salary that varies based on each Named Executive Officer’s position as follows:

 

  

Target Award
as a
Percentage of

Base Salary

 (%)

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

  425475

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  200

Craig IveyTimothy P. Cawley

President, Con Edison of New York

  250

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and

General Counsel

  150

Timothy P. CawleyRobert Sanchez

President and Chief Executive Officer,
Orange & Rockland

  200

Adjusted EPS Percentage” is the payout relative to target over the performance period beginning January 1, 20162018 and ending December 31, 20182020 based on attainment of the Company’s three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS performance goal, set forth in the following table, that was established in the first quarter of 2016.2018.

 

Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted EPS

(weighting 30%)(1)

Performance

Relative to Target

  

Performance

Goal

   

Payout Relative

to Target(2)

³ 112%

   ³ $13.57              200%

(Target) 100%

   $12.12             100%

< 88%

   < $10.67                 0%

Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted EPS

(weighting 30%)(1)

Performance

Relative to Target

  

Performance

Goal

   

Payout Relative

to Target(2)

(%)  ($)   (%)

³ 112

   ³ 14.80      200

(Target) 100

   13.21      100

< 88

   < 11.62          0

Footnotes:

(1) Adjusted EPS is the Company’s earnings per share based on adjusted earnings, which excludes the impact of certain items from net income determined in accordance with GAAP.
(2) Interpolated for actual performance between performance goals.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement39


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Operating Objectives Percentage” is the payout relative to target over the performance period beginning January 1, 20162018 and ending December 31, 20182020 based on the attainment of the Company’s operating performance goals, set forth in the following table, that were established in the first quarter of 2016.2018. These performance goals further long-term reliability and foster environmental sustainability.

 

Operating Objectives Performance Goals(1) 
 Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Advanced Meter Infrastructure Work Plan
(Weighting 5.0%)

            2               3(2)                  4 

Cyber Security Work Plan
(Weighting 5.0%)

            5               6(3)                  7 

Gas Main Replacement (Number of Miles Completed)
(Weighting 5.0%)

       200         235          ³ 270 

Growth in Renewable Portfolio (MW (AC)) (Weighting 5.0%)

  
127.5
 
  255(4)   
³ 382.5
 

Operating Objectives

 Performance Goals(1) 
 Threshold  Target  Maximum 

(each 5% weighting)

         

  Advanced Meter   Infrastructure Work   Plan

         < 7    9                      11     

  Cyber Security Work Plan

         < 4            5(2)                    6     

  Gas Main Replacement   (Number of Miles   Completed)

  < 298            334        370     

  Growth in Renewable   Portfolio (MW (AC))

  < 125   250(3)     ³ 375      

Footnotes:

(1) Payouts are relative to “Target” and are as follows: Threshold: 50%; Target: 100%; and Maximum: 150%. Payouts for Gas Main Replacement and Growth in Renewable Portfolio are interpolated for actual performance between performance goals.
(2) Target approved by the Compensation Committee for 2016. The Compensation Committee to approve the annual work plan. Performance results are based on average achievement over the three-year period.
(3)Target approved by the Compensation Committee for 2016. The Compensation Committee to approve the annual work plan. Performance results are based on average achievement over the three-year period. The target approved by the Compensation Committee for 20162018 applies to the first year of the three-year performance period for the 2018 performance units, the second year of the three-year performance period for the 20152017 performance units, and the third year of the three-year performance period for the 2016 performance units.
(4)(3) Target approved by the Compensation Committee for 2016. The Compensation Committee to approve annual plan levels on a three-year cumulative basis. The target approved by the Compensation Committee for 20162018 applies to the first year of the three-year performance period for the 2018 performance units, the second year of the three-year performance period for the 20152017 performance units, (andand the third year of the three-year performance period for the 20142016 performance units).units.

Shareholder Return Percentage” is the payout relative to target based on the cumulative change in Company total shareholder return over the performance period beginning January 1, 20162018 and ending December 31, 20182020 compared with the Company’s compensation peer group as constituted on the date the performance units were granted in 2016.2018. In the event that the companies that make up the

compensation peer group change during the performance period, the Compensation Committee will use the compensation peer group as constituted on the date the performance unit awards are granted. If a company ceases to be publicly traded before the end of the performance period, that company’s total shareholder returns will not be used to calculate the total shareholder return portion of the performance unit awards.

The Compensation Committee believes that total shareholder return is a performance goal that aligns executive compensation with the creation of stockholder value.

42CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The level of performance units will be earned as follows:

 

Company Percentile Rating

Payout Relative to

Target(1)

(%)

90th or greater

200%200

(Target) 50th

100%100

25th

  25%25

Below 25th

    0%0

Footnote:

(1) Interpolated for actual performance between performance goals.

The actual payout of the performance unit awards to the Named Executive Officers for the 2016-20182018–2020 performance period may vary from zero to a maximum of 190% of such award, based on actual performance over the performance period. The maximum payout of the performance unit awards represents the weighted average under each of the performance objectives as follows:

 

  Maximum
Percentage
Payout
  Target
Weight
  Weighted
Average
  Maximum
Percentage
Payout
 Target
Weight
 Weighted
Average
  (%)  (%)  (%)

Adjusted EPS

   200  30  60  200  30    60

Operating Objectives

   150  20  30  150  20    30

Shareholder Return

   200  50  100  200  50  100

TOTAL

    190        190

The Compensation Committee may exercise negative discretion to adjust the actual performance unit awards to be paid to a Named Executive Officer.

40CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Calculation of Payout of 20142016 Performance Unit Awards for Messrs. McAvoy, Hoglund, and Cawley, and Ms. Moore

Following the end of the relevant performance period for each outstanding performance unit award, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s achievement of the performance goals. The Compensation Committee evaluates and approves the Company’s performance relative to target and pays out the performance units in either cash and/or shares of Company Common Stock (as elected by the Named Executive Officer), based on the attainment of the performance goals.

For the 2014-20162016-2018 performance period, payouts of the performance units were calculated based on the followingnon-discretionary formula:

Award X 30% X Adjusted EPS Percentage

plus

Award X 20% X Operating Objectives Percentage

plus

Award X 50% X Shareholder Return Percentage

Award” was the annual award of performance units under the long term incentive plan. The target award of performance units was a percentage of base salary that varies based on each Named Executive Officer’s position at the time of award as follows:

 

   

Target Award as a

Percentage of
Base Salary

  (%)

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

  375425

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  200

Craig IveyTimothy P. Cawley

President, Con Edison of New York (President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland, at the time the 2016 performance units were awarded)

  250200

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and

General Counsel

  150

Timothy P. Cawley

President and Chief Executive Officer,

Orange & Rockland

200

Adjusted EPS Percentage” was the payout relative to target over the performance period that began January 1, 20142016 and ended December 31, 20162018, based on attainment of the Company’s three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS performance goal, set forth in the following table, that was established in the first quarter of 2014.2016.

 

Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted EPS

(weighting 30%)

Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted EPS

(weighting 30%)

Three-Year Cumulative Adjusted EPS

(weighting 30%)

Performance

Relative to Target

  

Performance

Goal

   

Payout Relative

to Target(1)

  

Performance

Goal

   

Payout Relative

to Target(1)

³ 112%

   ³ $13.14                 200%

(Target) 100%

   $11.73                100%

< 88%

   < $10.32                    0%
(%)  ($)   (%)

³ 112

   ³ 13.57         200

(Target) 100

   12.12         100

< 88

   < 10.67             0

ACTUAL

   $11.96(2)          116.3%   12.44(2)   122.2

Footnotes:

(1) Interpolated for actual performance between performance goals.
(2) Excludes the effects of the 2014 gain on Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses, Inc.’s sale of solar electric production projects and loss from lease in/lease out transactions, the 2016 gain on sale of itsthe Clean Energy Businesses retail supply businesses andbusiness, goodwill impairment related to itsthe Clean Energy Businesses energy serviceservices business, income tax effect of the Tax Cuts and itsJob Act, the Clean Energy Businesses’ net gain on their acquisition of Sempra Solar Holdings, LLC and netmark-to-market effects. Also, excludes 2015 impairmenteffects of assets held for sale of Pike County Light & Power Company.the Clean Energy Businesses.
 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  4143


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Operating Objectives Percentage” was the payout relative to target over the performance period that began January 1, 20142016 and ended December 31, 20162018, based on the attainment of the Company’s operating performance goals, set forth in the following table, that were established in the first quarter of 2014.table.

 

Operating Objectives Performance Goals(1)  Payout
Relative to
Target
 Threshold  Target  Maximum  

System Hardening and Resiliency Projects (Weighting 10%)

  

 

83

 

 

 

  

 

93

 

 

 

  

 

³ 103

 

 

 

 102 /
145%

Growth in Renewable Portfolio (MW (AC)) (Weighting 5%)

  

 

231.5 

 

 

 

  

 

463 (2)

 

 

 

  

 

³ 694.5 

 

 

 

 786 /
150%

SF6 Gas Emissions Pounds of Gas Emitted (Weighting 2.5%)

  

 

51,750

 

 

 

  

 

45,000

 

 

 

  

 

£ 38,250

 

 

 

 38,892 /
145.2%

Opacity Occurrences Number of Occurrences (Weighting 2.5%)

  

 

207

 

 

 

  

 

180

 

 

 

  

 

£ 153

 

 

 

 89 /
150%

TOTAL

             147.0%
Operating Objectives   Performance Goals  Achievement/
Payout
Relative to
Target(1)
 
   Threshold  Target  Maximum 

2016-2018
(each 5% weighting)

 

        

Advanced Metering
Infrastructure
Work Plan(2)

 

            
  2016  < 2   3            4   4 / 150% 
  2017  < 5   7            9   9 / 150% 
  2018  < 7   9   11   11 / 150% 

Average

              150% 
 

Cyber Security(2)

 

            
  2016  < 5   6        7   7 / 150% 
  2017  < 3   4        5   5 / 150% 
  2018  < 4   5        6   6 / 150% 

Average

              150% 

Gas Main Replacement Number of Miles
Completed

  < 200  235  ³ 270  285 / 150.0% 

Growth in Renewable
Portfolio (MW (AC))(3)

 

            
  2016  < 127.5   255   ³ 382.5   372    
  2017  < 110.0   220   ³ 330.0   264    
  2018  < 125.0   250   ³ 375.0   252    

Cumulative

  < 362.5   725   ³ 1087.5   888 / 123% 

TOTAL

                143% 

Footnotes:

(1) Payouts were relative to “Target” and were as follows: Threshold: 50%; Target: 100%; and Maximum: 150%. Payouts for Gas Main Replacement and Growth in Renewable Portfolio were interpolated for actual performance between performance goals.
(2) The Compensation Committee approved annual plan levelswork plans in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The performance results are based on a three-year cumulative basis, 2014-2016. Target amount represents the sumaverage achievement at the end of the threethree-year period.
(3)The Compensation Committee approved annual targets as approved bywork plans in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The Performance results are based on the Compensation Committee.cumulative achievement over the three-year period.

Shareholder Return Percentage” was the payout relative to target based on the cumulative change in Company total shareholder return over the performance period that began January 1, 20142016 and ended December 31, 20162018 compared

with the Company’s compensation peer group as constituted on the date the performance units were granted

in 2014.2016. In the event that the companies that made up the compensation peer group changed during the performance period, the Compensation Committee used the compensation peer group as constituted on the date the performance unit awards were granted. If a company ceased to be publicly traded before the end of the performance period, that company’s total shareholder returns waswere not used to calculate the total shareholder return portion of the performance unit awards.

The level of performance units earned was as follows:

 

Company Percentile Rating

Payout Relative to

Target(1)

Company Percentile Rating(%)

90th or greater

200%200

(Target) 50th

100%100

25th

  25%25

Below 25th

    0%0

ACTUAL 56th42nd percentile

115%76

Footnote:

(1) Interpolated for actual performance between performance goals.

The payout of the performance unit awards represents the weighted average of the percentage payout under each of the performance objectives as follows:

 

 Maximum
Percentage
Payout
 Target
Weight
 Payout
Relative
to Target
 Weighted
Result
  Maximum
Percentage
Payout
 Target
Weight
 Actual
Result
 Weighted
Result
  (%) (%) (%) (%)

Adjusted EPS

   200  30  116.3  34.9  200    30   122.2  36.7  

Operating Objectives

   150  20  147  29.4  150    20   143  28.6  

Shareholder Return

   200  50  115  57.5  200    50   76  38.0  

TOTAL

   190%   121.8%   190   103.3  

The Compensation Committee did not exercise negative discretion to adjust the actual performance unit awards to be paid to a Named Executive Officer.

 

 

4244 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

The following table shows, for each Named Executive Officer (other than Mr. Sanchez), the calculation of the payout with respect to the performance units for the 2014–20162016-2018 performance period:

 

Name & Principal Position  2014 Award   Weighted
Result
  2014-2016
Payout
Total
 

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

   83,700    121.8  101,947 

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

   26,000    121.8  31,668 

Craig Ivey

President, Con Edison of New York

   35,000    121.8  42,630 

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

   16,000    121.8  19,488 

Timothy P. Cawley

President and Chief Executive Officer,

Orange & Rockland

   15,000    121.8  18,270 
   

2016 Award 

(in Units) 

  Weighted
Result
  2016-2018
Payout (in Units)
Total
Name & Principal Position  (#)  (%)  (#)

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

    83,100     103.3    85,842

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

    23,400     103.3    24,172

Timothy P. Cawley

President, Con Edison of New York (President and

Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland, at the

time the 2016 performance units were awarded)

    13,400     103.3    13,842

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

    14,800     103.3    15,288

 

Calculation of Payout of 2016 Performance Unit Awards for Mr. Sanchez

Similar to the other Named Executive Officers, Mr. Sanchez received an award of performance units in 2016 under the Company’s long-term incentive plan. At the time the award was granted, Mr. Sanchez served as a Vice President of the Company and his award was subject to different performance goals than those applicable to the other Named Executive Officers. Following the end of the 2016-2018 performance period, the Compensation Committee evaluated and approved the performance goals relative to target and the payout of Mr. Sanchez’s performance units was calculated based on the followingnon-discretionary formula:

Award X 50% X Shareholder Return Percentage

plus

Award X 50% X Incentive Plan Percentage

Award” was the target award of performance units granted to Mr. Sanchez (i.e., 3,000 units).

Shareholder Return Percentage” was the weighting earned based on the cumulative change in Company total shareholder return over the performance period that began January 1, 2016 and ended December 31, 2018 compared with the Company’s compensation peer group on the date the performance units were granted.

The level of performance units were calculated as follows:

Payout Relative to

Target(1)

Company Percentile Rating(%)

90th or greater

200

(Target) 50th

100

25th

25

Below 25th

0

ACTUAL 42nd percentile

76

Footnote:

(1)Payouts were interpolated for actual performance between performance goals.

Incentive Plan Percentage” was based on the average calculated payouts under the Company’s annual incentive plan over the performance period that began January 1, 2016 and ended December 31, 2018.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement45


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Based on the Company’s achievement of the performance goals, Mr. Sanchez received the following payout for the 2016-2018 performance period:

(

 

Award

×

50%

 

)

 × 

Shareholder 

Return

Percentage 

 

+

 

(

 

Award

×

50%

 

)

 ×  

Incentive
Plan
Percentage(1)

 

 = 

 2016-2018
Payout
Total
                         
  1,500     76%     1,500     116.9%   2,895

Footnote:

(1)The calculated Incentive Plan Percentage for each year in the 2016-2018 performance period was as follows:

2016  2017  2018  Average
(%)  (%)  (%)  (%)
125.1  105.9  119.7  116.9

The Company did not exercise negative discretion to adjust the actual performance units to be paid to Mr. Sanchez.

RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFITS

The Company provides employees with a range of retirement and welfare benefits that reflectsreflect the competitive practices of the utility industry. These benefits assist the Company in attracting, retaining and motivating employees critical to its long-term success. Named Executive Officers are eligible for benefits under the following Company plans:

 

Tax-qualifiedtax-qualified defined benefit retirement plan and its relatednon-qualified supplemental retirement income plan (collectively, the “retirement plans”) (closed to new and rehired management employees as of December 31, 2016);

 

Tax-qualifiedtax-qualified savings plan (including the defined contribution pension formula) and its relatednon-qualified deferred income plan;plan (collectively, the “savings plans”);

 

Stockstock purchase plan; and

 

Healthhealth and welfare plans.

Retirement Plans

The Company maintains atax-qualified defined benefit retirement plan that covers substantially all of the Company’s employees.employees, including the Named Executive Officers, hired before 2017. All management employees, including Named Executive Officers, whose benefits under the retirement plan are limited by the Internal Revenue Code, are eligible to participate in anon-qualified supplemental retirement income plan. The retirement plans and the estimated retirementpension benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers (determined on a present value basis) under

the retirement plans are described in the Pension BenefitsTable and the narrative to the Pension Benefits Table on pages 5355 to 54. There were no

56. All changes to the retirement plans for plan year 20162018 with respect to the Named Executive Officers.Officers are described in the narrative to the “Pension Benefits Table” on page 56.

As required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the “Change in Pension Value andNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 4850 sets forth the year-over-year change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated pension benefits for each Named Executive Officer under the retirement plans. The Company did not provide above-market or preferential earnings with respect to thenon-qualified deferred compensation arrangements in the years reported.

The change in the actuarial present value of an accumulated pension benefit is subject to many external variables, including fluctuations in interest rates and changes in actuarial assumptions, and does not represent actual compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers in 2016.2018. Instead, the amounts represent changes in the estimated retirementpension benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers based on the year-over-year difference between the amounts required to be disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table on page 5456 as of December 31, 20162018 and the amounts reported in the Pension BenefitsTable in the 20162018 proxy statement on page 54.52 as of December 31, 2017.

The change into the actuarial present value of Mr. McAvoy’s accumulated pension benefit resultedin 2018 was $1,750,204, which was primarily from his salarydue to the increase upon his promotion to chief executive officer in 2013. For management employees who participatebase pay and credit for an additional year of service, partially offset by changes in the retirement plan and who were hired before January 1, 2001, including

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement43


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Mr. McAvoy, a “final average salary” formula isactuarial assumptions used to determine a participant’s pension benefit. The “final average salary” includes a participant’s highest average salary for the 48 consecutive months withinCompany’s financial statements, including an increase in the 120 consecutive months priorassumed discount rate from 3.70% to retirement. (See narrative to the Pension Benefits Table on page 53.) Mr. McAvoy’s higher earnings as chief executive officer in 2016 replaced lower earnings during a portion of the 48 consecutive month “final average salary” period resulting in a higher “final average salary” pursuant to the pension formula.4.25%.

Savings Plans

The Company maintains atax-qualified savings plan that covers substantially all of the Company’s employees.employees, including the Named Executive Officers. All management employees, including the Named Executive Officers, whose benefits under the savings plan are limited bysubject to the compensation limit in the Internal Revenue Code, are eligible to participate in a deferred income plan, anon-qualified deferred compensation plan. (The Internal Revenue Code compensation limit for 2018 was $275,000.) Named Executive Officers may elect to defer a portion of their salary into the deferred income plan. The deferred income plan is described in the narrative to theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 55.57.

46CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Company matching contributions allocatedalso maintains, effective as of January 1, 2017, a defined contribution pension formula within thetax-qualified savings plan that, following the closure of the retirement plan to new management participants, covers all new and rehired management employees of the Named Executive OfficersCompany. Until June 30, 2021, management employees hired between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2016, including Mr. Hoglund and Ms. Moore, may make an irrevocable election to earn future retirement benefits under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan instead of the retirement plan.

Effective January 1, 2018, Mr. Hoglund made an irrevocable election to earn future retirement benefits under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan instead of the retirement plan. Under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan, the Company makesnon-elective employer contributions for a participant at the same level as it would under the cash balance formula in the retirement plan. The cash balance formula and the defined contribution pension formula are both described in the narrative to the “Pension Benefits Table” on pages 55 and 56. All Companynon-elective contribution amounts under the defined contribution pension formula that are based on compensation that is above the compensation limit in the Internal Revenue Code are credited to the deferred income plan are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 48.plan.

Employees who participate in the savings plan, including the Named Executive Officers, may contribute up to 50% of their compensation on abefore-tax basis and/or anafter-tax basis, into their savings plan accounts. For participating employees whose retirement planpension benefit is based on the final average salary formula in the retirement plan, including Messrs. McAvoy, Cawley, and Cawley,Sanchez, the Company matches 50% for each dollar contributed by suchparticipating employees on the first six percent (6%)6% of their regular earnings. For participating employees whose retirement plan benefit ispension benefits are determined using the retirement plan’s cash balance formula, including Messrs. Hoglund and Ivey and Ms. Moore, or for participants who actively participate in the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan, including Mr. Hoglund, the Company matches 100% for each dollar contributed by such participating employees on the first four percent (4%)4% of their regular earnings plus an additional 50% for each dollar contributed on the next four percent (4%)4% of their regular earnings. The final average salary formula and the cash balance formula under the retirement plan are described in the narrative

All Company contributions allocated to the Pension Benefits Table on page 53.

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, effective for 2016,Named Executive Officers under the savings plan limitsand credited under the “additions” that can be made to a participating employee’s account to $53,000 per year. “Additions” include Company matching contributions,before-tax contributions made by a participating employee under Section 401(k)deferred income plan are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Internal Revenue Code, andSummary Compensation Table’ on page 50.

employeeafter-tax contributions. Of those additions, the maximumbefore-tax contribution was $18,000 per year (or $24,000 per year for participants age 50 and over). In addition, no more than $265,000 of annual compensation may be taken into account in computing benefits under the savings plan.

Stock Purchase Plan

The stock purchase plan covers substantially all of the Company’s employees, including the Named Executive Officers, and provides the opportunity to purchase shares of Company Common Stock. The stock purchase plan is described in Note Mto the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

Health and Welfare Plans

Active employee benefits, such as medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, life insurance, and disability coverage, are available to substantially all employees, including the Named Executive Officers, through the Company’s health and welfare benefits plans. Employees contribute toward the cost of the health plans by paying a portion of the premium costs on apre-tax basis. Employees may purchase additional life insurance and disability coverage on anafter-tax basis. Officers, including the Named Executive Officers, may purchase supplemental health benefits on anafter-tax basis with the option to continue their participation following retirement. The Company also provides all employees with paidtime-off benefits, such as vacation and sick leave.

Perquisites and Personal Benefits

The Company provides certain officers, including the Named Executive Officers, with limited, specific perquisites that are competitive with industry practices. The Compensation Committee reviews the level of perquisites and personal benefits annually. The Company provides the following perquisites, the costs of which, if used by a Named Executive Officer in 2016,2018, are set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 48:50:

 

Supplementalsupplemental health insurance;

 

Reimbursementreimbursement for reasonable costs of financial planning; and

 

Aa company vehicle and, in the case of the chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer, a company vehicle and driver.

 

 

44CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement47


LOGOLOGO  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Severance and Change of Control Benefits

The Company provides for the payment of severance benefits upon certain types of employment terminations. Providing severance and change of control benefits assists the Company in attracting and retaining executive talent and reduces the personal uncertainty that executives are likely to feel when considering a corporate transaction. These arrangements also provide valuable retention incentives that focus executives on completing such transactions, thus, enhancing long-term stockholder value. The compensation under the various circumstances that trigger payments or provision of benefits upon termination or a change of control was chosen to be broadly consistent with prevailing competitive practices.

Officers of the Company, including the Named Executive Officers, are provided benefits under the officers’ severance program. The severance benefits payable to each Named Executive Officer are described in footnotes 2(2) and 3(3) to the Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control table on pages 57 to 58.page 59. The estimated severance benefits that each Named Executive Officer would be entitled to receive upon a hypothetical termination of employment are set forth in the applicable Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control table beginning on page 57.59.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Company has stock ownership guidelines for certainsenior officers, including the Named Executive Officers. The stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s Named Executive Officers are as follows:

 

Title  Multiple of
Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer  3 × base salary
Chief Financial Officer  2 × base salary
President of Con Edison of New York  2 × base salary
President and Chief Executive Officer of   Orange & Rockland  2 × base salary
General Counsel  1 × base salary

Officers of the Company subject to the guidelines have five years from January 1st after their appointment to one of the covered titletitles or promotion to a position with a higher ownership requirement to meet the guidelines. In January 2017,2019, it was determined that, as of December 31, 2016,2018, these

officers have either met their ownership milestones or are making reasonable progress towardstoward their milestones.

The officers covered by the guidelines are expected to retain for at least one year a minimum of 25% of the net shares acquired upon exercise of stock options and 25% of the net shares acquired pursuant to vested restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants until their holdings of common stock equal or exceed their applicable ownership guidelines.

While stock options may be granted under the Company’s long term incentive plan, the Company has no outstanding stock options and no stock options have been granted by the Company since 2006.

For purposes of the guidelines:

 

“Stock ownership” includes the value of the officers’ individually-owned shares, the value of vested restricted shares and performance basedperformance-based restricted shares, and shares held under the Company’s benefit plans. Equity-based incentive compensation held by the Company’s officers is based 100% on performance. Restricted stock and restricted stock units do not vest until after the end of the performance period and performance is determined by the Compensation Committee.

 

Theone-year period is measured from the date the stock options are exercised or the restricted stock or restricted stock units vest, as applicable.

 

“Net shares” means the shares remaining after sale of shares necessary to pay the related tax liability and, if applicable, exercise price.

NO HEDGING NORAND NO PLEDGING

To encourage a long-term commitment to the Company’s sustained performance, the Company’s policiesHedging and Pledging Policy and Insider Trading Policy each prohibit all directors and officers, including the Named Executive Officers, financial personnel, and certain other individuals, respectively, from shorting, hedging, and pledging Company securities or holding Company securities in a margin account.account as collateral for a loan.

48CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

RECOUPMENT POLICY

In 2010, the Company adopted a Recoupment Policy (commonly referred to as a “clawback policy”). The Recoupment Policy allows the Company to recoup excess incentive-based compensation received by any current or former officer during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company’s Audit Committee determines that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws. The Recoupment Policy applies to the long-term incentive-based compensation awards under the Company’s long term incentive plan, and the incentive-based compensation payments made under the Company’s annual incentive plan.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement45


LOGOCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

TAX DEDUCTIBILITY OF PAY

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code placesgenerally precludes a limit of $1 million on the amount ofpublic corporation from taking an income tax deduction for compensation that the Company may deduct in any one year with respect to each of the Named Executive Officers, other than the chief financial officer, employed by the Company on the last day of the fiscal year. There is an exception to the $1 million limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. While the Compensation Committee considers the tax impact of Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee has determined that it is appropriate to maintain flexibility in compensating Named Executive Officers in a

manner intended to promote varying corporate goals, recognizing that certain amounts paid to Named Executive Officers in excess of $1 million may not be deductiblepayable in any fiscal year to the corporation’s chief executive officer and other “covered employees,” as defined in Section 162(m). Prior

to January 1, 2018, an exception to this deduction limit was available for “performance-based” compensation that was approved by stockholders and otherwise satisfied certain requirements under Section 162(m). Accordingly, whileAs a result of new tax legislation, the performance-based compensation exception is no longer available for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, unless such compensation qualifies for certain transition relief. The new tax legislation also expanded the definition of “covered employees” to include the chief financial officer and certain former named executive officers who were disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement after January 1, 2017. The Compensation Committee continues to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that are based on factors other than Section 162(m) when necessary or appropriate (as determined by the Compensation Committee strivesin its sole discretion) to award executive compensation that meetsenable the deductibility requirements, it has reserved the rightCompany to enter into compensation arrangements under which payments are not deductible on account of Section 162(m). continue to attract, retain, reward and motivate its highly-qualified executives.

For 2016,2018, the Company estimates that approximately $1,740,000, $1,971,000, and $931,000$2,253,000 of the compensation paid to Mr. McAvoy Mr. Ivey, and Ms. Moore, respectively, was not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

 

 

46CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.Proxy Statement


LOGOCOMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT

COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT

In 2016, the Compensation Committee asked Mercer to undertake a risk assessment of the Company’s compensation programs to determine whether the Company’s compensation policies and practices for employees, generally, would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s risk management and create incentives that could lead to excessive or inappropriate risk taking by employees. The Compensation Committee also asked management to review the assessment. Based on Mercer’s risk assessment findings, with which the Compensation Committee and management concur, the Company’s compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s risk management or create incentives that could lead to excessive or inappropriate risk taking by employees.

Among the relevant features of the Company’s compensation programs that mitigate risk are:

A recoupment policy applicable to all Company officers with respect to incentive-based compensation;

Annual and long-term incentives under the Company’s compensation programs appropriately balanced between annual and long-term financial performance goals that are

tied to key goals that are expected to enhance stockholder value;

Annual and long-term incentives tied to multiple performance goals to reduce undue weight on any one goal;

Non-financial performance factors used in determining the actual payout of annual incentive compensation as a counterbalance to financial performance goals;

Compensation programs designed to deliver a significant portion of compensation in the form of long-term incentives, discouraging excessive focus on annual results;

Performance-based equity awards based on performance over a three-year period, focusing on sustainable performance over a three-year cycle rather than any one year;

Annual and long-term incentive awards that are subject to appropriate payment caps and Compensation Committee discretion to reduce payouts; and

Share ownership guidelines that further the long-term interests of executives and stockholders, and restrictions on shorting, hedging, and pledging Company securities.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. Proxy Statement  4749


LOGOLOGO  SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the compensation for the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017, and 2014.2016. Information for Mr. CawleySanchez for fiscal years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2016 is not provided because he was not a Named Executive Officer in that year.those years.

 

Name & Principal
Position
 Year  Salary  Bonus  Stock
Awards(1)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
  Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
  All Other
Compensation(4)
  Securities
and
Exchange
Commission
Total(5)
     Securities
and
Exchange
Commission
Total
Without
Change in
Pension
Value(6)
 
John McAvoy  2016  $1,220,767  $—    $6,176,408  $2,237,200  $5,103,773  $64,256  $14,802,404      $9,698,631 

Chairman,

President and Chief

Executive Officer

  2015  $1,171,350  $—    $3,987,654  $1,776,600  $4,030,677  $59,392  $11,025,673      $6,994,996 
  2014  $1,140,000  $—    $3,055,887  $1,711,100  $3,724,321  $54,380  $9,685,688      $5,961,367 
                                        
Robert Hoglund  2016  $721,242  $—    $1,739,205  $528,200  $134,593  $59,272  $3,182,512      $3,047,919 

Senior Vice

President and Chief

Financial Officer

  2015  $700,200  $—    $1,268,799  $531,100  $142,890  $55,970  $2,698,959      $2,556,069 
  2014  $679,742  $—    $949,260  $511,500  $814,137  $54,178  $3,008,817      $2,194,680 
                                        

Craig Ivey

President, Con

Edison of New York

  2016  $795,367  $—    $2,393,265  $796,600  $155,369  $61,341  $4,201,942      $4,046,573 
  2015  $772,225  $—    $1,754,100  $831,100  $118,048  $58,922  $3,534,395      $3,416,347 
  2014  $748,058  $—    $1,277,850  $855,000  $230,725  $57,813  $3,169,446      $2,938,721 
Elizabeth D. Moore  2016  $608,017  $—    $1,100,010  $445,300  $125,952  $51,049  $2,330,328      $2,204,376 

Senior Vice

President and

General Counsel

  2015  $590,267  $—    $801,039  $447,700  $108,323  $49,290  $1,996,619      $1,888,296 
  2014  $573,017  $—    $584,160  $431,200  $128,517  $46,955  $1,763,849      $1,635,332 
                                        
                                        
Timothy P. Cawley  2016  $409,033  $—    $995,955  $401,500  $559,125  $30,587  $2,396,200      $1,837,075 

President and Chief

Executive Officer,

Orange & Rockland

  2015  $400,725  $—    $725,028  $233,000  $550,075  $30,074  $1,938,902      $1,388,827 
                                        
                                        
  Name & Principal
  Position
 Year Salary Bonus Stock
Awards(1)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
 Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
 All Other
Compensation(4)
 

Securities  

and  

Exchange  

Commission  

Total(5)  

   Securities
and
Exchange
Commission
Total
Without
Change in
Pension
Value(6)
   ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)     ($)
  John McAvoy   2018   1,296,667   —     4,968,812   1,675,400   1,750,204   74,775   9,765,858       8,015,654

  Chairman,

  President and Chief

  Executive Officer

   2017   1,257,083   —     5,507,622   1,864,800   7,346,614   71,792   16,047,911       8,701,297
   2016   1,220,767   —     6,176,408   2,237,200   5,103,773   64,256   14,802,404       9,698,631
                                               
 
  Robert Hoglund   2018   765,142   —     1,235,340   395,400   (110,367)   171,838   2,457,353       2,567,720

  Senior Vice

  President and Chief

  Financial Officer

   2017   742,892   —     1,441,970   440,900   277,846   60,418   2,964,026       2,686,180
   2016   721,242   —     1,739,205   528,200   134,593   59,272   3,182,512       3,047,919
                                               
  Timothy P. Cawley(7)   2018   611,000   —     1,242,203   494,500   307,835   37,951   2,693,489       2,385,654

  President, Con

  Edison of New York

   2017   420,975   —     815,944   449,700   1,296,529   30,984   3,014,132       1,717,603
   2016   409,033   —     995,955   401,500   559,125   30,587   2,396,200       1,837,075
 
  Elizabeth D. Moore   2018   645,033   —     782,382   333,300   128,971   54,977   1,944,663       1,815,692

  Senior Vice

  President and

  General Counsel

   2017   626,275   —     914,420   371,700   144,744   52,623   2,109,762       1,965,018
   2016   608,017   —     1,100,010   445,300   125,952   51,049   2,330,328       2,204,376
                                               
  Robert Sanchez   2018   437,883   —     713,752   420,000   378,160   19,647   1,969,442       1,591,282

  President and Chief

  Executive Officer,

  Orange & Rockland

                                               

Footnotes:

(1) Dividends are not paid and do not accrue on awards during the vesting period. Amounts shown do not reflect the payment or accrual of dividends during the vesting period for any portion of the awards and otherwise reflect the assumptions used for the Company’s financial statements. (See Note M to the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K.) Actual value to be realized, if any, on awards by the Named Executive Officers will depend on the satisfaction of certainpre-established objectives, the performance of Company Common Stock, and the Named Executive Officer’s continued service. The awards granted for fiscal year 20162018 are set forth on the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 50.52. Based on the fair value at grant date, the following are the maximum potential values of the performance units for the 2016-20182018–2020 performance period granted under the long term incentive plan assuming maximum level of performance is achieved: Mr. McAvoy $11,735,174;$9,440,743; Mr. Hoglund $3,304,490;$2,347,146; Mr. Ivey $4,547,204;Cawley $2,360,186; Ms. Moore $2,090,019;$1,486,526; and Mr. Cawley $1,892,315.Sanchez $1,356,129.
(2) The amounts paid were awarded under the annual incentive plan.
(3) Amounts do not represent actual compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers. Instead, the amounts represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value for Messrs. McAvoy, Cawley, and Sanchez, and the change in account balance for Mr. Hoglund and Ms. Moore of the accumulated pension benefit based on the difference between the amounts required to be disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table for the year indicated and the amounts reported or that would have been reported in the Pension Benefits Table for the previous year. The Company did not provide above-market or preferential earnings with respect to thenon-qualified deferred compensation arrangements.
The change in the present value of Mr. McAvoy’s accumulated pension benefit resulted primarily from his salary increase upon his promotion to chief executive officer in 2013. For management employees who participate in the retirement plan and who were hired before January 1, 2001, including Mr. McAvoy, a “final average salary” formula is used to determine a participant’s pension benefit. The “final average salary” includes a participant’s highest average salary for the 48 consecutive months within the 120 consecutive months prior to retirement. Mr. McAvoy’s higher earnings as chief executive officer in 2016 replaced lower earnings during a portion of the 48 consecutive month “final average salary” period resulting in a higher “final average salary” pursuant to the pension formula. See “Retirement and Other Benefits—Retirement Plans” on page 43 and narrative to the Pension Benefits Table on page 53.

 

4850 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

(4) For 2016,2018, the amount reported in the “All Other Compensation” column for each Named Executive Officers is as follows:

 

  McAvoy   Hoglund   Cawley   Moore   Sanchez 
  McAvoy   Hoglund   Ivey   Moore   Cawley  ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($) 

Personal use of Company provided vehicle

  $5,298   $4,283   $435   $6,734   $7,516    10,177    3,961    7,821    2,750    6,564 

Driver costs

  $1,451   $—     $—     $—     $—      3,671    —      —      —      —   

Financial planning

  $18,500   $10,800   $10,800   $10,800   $10,800    18,500    11,800    11,800    11,800    —   

Supplemental health insurance

  $2,384   $2,384   $2,384   $833   $—      3,527    3,527    —      1,725    —   

Company matching contributions:

Qualified savings plan

  $7,950   $14,430   $15,900   $12,101   $7,950    8,250    16,500    8,250    16,500    8,250 

Non-qualified savings plan

  $28,673   $27,375   $31,822   $20,581   $4,321 

Non-qualified deferred income plan

   30,650    29,409    10,080    22,202    4,833 

Companynon-elective contributions (defined contribution pension formula):

Qualified savings plan

   —      17,552    —      —      —   

Non-qualified deferred income plan

   —      89,089    —      —      —   

Total

  $64,256   $59,272   $61,341   $51,049   $30,587    74,775    171,838    37,951    54,977    19,647 

The value of the items in the table are based on the aggregate incremental cost, which except for the Company provided vehicle, is the actual cost to the Company. The cost of the Company provided vehicle was determined based on the personal use of the vehicle as a percentage of total usage compared to the lease value of the vehicle. The Company did not provide above-market or preferential earnings with respect to thenon-qualified deferred compensation arrangements.

(5) As per the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules, represents, for each Named Executive Officer, the total of amounts shown for the Named Executive Officer in all other columns of the table.
(6) To show the effect that the year-over-year change in pension value had on total compensation, this column is included to show total compensation minus the change in pension value. The amounts reported in the “Securities and Exchange Commission Total Without Change in Pension Value” column may differ substantially from the amounts reported in the “Securities and Exchange Commission Total” column required under SEC rules and are not a substitute for total compensation. The “Securities and Exchange Commission Total Without Change in Pension Value” column represents total compensation, as required under applicable SEC rules, minus the change in pension value reported in the “Change in Pension Value andNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Retirement and otherOther Benefits—Retirement Plans” on page 43.46.
(7)The increase in Mr. Cawley’s base salary reflects his change in position from President and Chief Executive Officer of Orange & Rockland through November 1, 2017, to President of Con Edison of New York effective January 1, 2018.

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  4951


LOGOLOGO  GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

 

 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the grant of equity plan awards andnon-equity incentive plan awards awarded to the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

       Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
   Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
   

Grant
Date Fair
Value of

Stock
Awards(3)
($)

 
Name & Principal Position  Grant
Date
   Threshold
($)
   

Target

($)

   Maximum
($)
   Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
   Maximum
(#)
   

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

   2/1/2016   $153,100   $1,225,000   $2,358,100    2,078    83,100    157,890   $6,176,408 

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

   2/1/2016   $45,200   $361,500   $695,900    585    23,400    44,460   $1,739,205 

Craig Ivey

President, Con Edison of
New York

   2/1/2016   $79,700   $637,800   $1,227,800    805    32,200    61,180   $2,393,265 

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and
General Counsel

   2/1/2016   $38,100   $304,800   $586,700    370    14,800    28,120   $1,100,010 

Timothy P. Cawley

President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

   2/1/2016   $41,000   $327,800   $631,000    335    13,400    25,460   $995,955 
      Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
  

Grant
Date Fair
Value of

Stock
Awards(3)

($)

  Name & Principal Position  Grant
Date
  Threshold
($)
  

Target

($)

  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)

  John McAvoy

  Chairman, President and
  Chief Executive Officer

    2/15/2018    203,125    1,625,000    3,168,750    1,810      72,400    137,560    4,968,812  

  Robert Hoglund

  Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

    2/15/2018    47,938    383,500    747,825    450      18,000    34,200    1,235,340  

  Timothy P. Cawley

  President, Con Edison of
  New York

    2/15/2018    61,200    489,600    954,720    453      18,100    34,390    1,242,203  

  Elizabeth D. Moore

  Senior Vice President and
  General Counsel

    2/15/2018    40,413    323,300    630,435    285      11,400    21,660    782,382  

  Robert Sanchez

  President and Chief Executive
  Officer, Orange & Rockland

    2/15/2018    43,863    350,900    701,800    260      10,400    19,760    713,752  

Footnotes:

(1) Represents annual cash incentive award opportunity awarded under the Company’s annual incentive plan. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Annual Incentive Compensation” beginning on page 34.35.)
(2) Represents grants of performance units for the 2016-20182018–2020 performance period granted under the Company’s long term incentive plan. (See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation Actions—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” beginning on page 39.41.) Based on the fair value at grant date, the following are the maximum potential values of the performance units for the 2016-20182018–2020 performance period granted under the long term incentive plan assuming maximum level of performance is achieved: Mr. McAvoy $11,735,174;$9,440,743; Mr. Hoglund $3,304,490;$2,347,146; Mr. Ivey $4,547,204;Cawley $2,360,186; Ms. Moore $2,090,019;$1,486,526; and Mr. Cawley $1,892,315.Sanchez $1,356,129.
(3) The “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards” column reflects the grant date fair value of the performance units for the 2016-20182018-2020 performance period. (See footnote 1(1) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 48.50.)

 

5052 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS TABLE

 

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS TABLE

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all unvested stock awards previously awarded to the Named Executive Officers as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

  STOCK AWARDS(1)

   STOCK AWARDS(1)

Name & Principal Position  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:

Number of unearned
shares, units or other
rights held that have
not vested

 

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:

Market or Payout Value
of unearned shares, units
or other rights that have
not vested

  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:

Number of unearned
shares, units or other
rights held that have
not vested

 

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:

Market or Payout Value
of unearned shares, units
or other rights that have
not vested

  (#) ($)
John McAvoy   68,200(2)  $5,024,976     78,300(2)   5,986,818

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

   83,100(3)  $6,122,808     72,400(3)   5,535,704
Robert Hoglund   21,700(2)  $1,598,856     20,500(2)   1,567,430

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   23,400(3)  $1,724,112     18,000(3)   1,376,280
Craig Ivey   30,000(2)  $2,210,400 
Timothy P. Cawley    11,600(2)   886,936

President, Con Edison of New York

   32,200(3)  $2,372,496     18,100(3)   1,383,926
Elizabeth D. Moore   13,700(2)  $1,009,416     13,000(2)   993,980

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

   14,800(3)  $1,090,464     11,400(3)   871,644
Timothy P. Cawley   12,400(2)  $913,632 
Robert Sanchez    4,400(2)   336,424

President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

   13,400(3)  $987,312     10,400(3)   795,184

Footnotes:

(1) Value of unvested performance-based equity awards using the closing price of $73.68$76.46 for a share of Company Common Stock on December 31, 2016.2018.
(2) The number of performance units and payment amount of the performance units will be determined as of December 31, 20172019 based on satisfaction of performance goals for the 2015-20172017-2019 performance cycle.
(3) The number of performance units and payment amount of the performance units will be determined as of December 31, 20182020 based on satisfaction of performance goals for the 2016-20182018-2020 performance cycle.

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  5153


LOGOLOGO  OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

 

 

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all stock awards vested in 20162018 for the Named Executive Officers.

 

   STOCK AWARDS(1)

 
Name & Principal Position  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
   Value Realized
on Vesting
 

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

   101,947   $7,512,474 

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   31,668   $2,333,615 

Craig Ivey

President, Con Edison of New York

   42,630   $3,141,405 

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

   19,488   $1,436,071 

Timothy P. Cawley

President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

   18,270   $1,346,316 
   STOCK AWARDS(1)

  Name & Principal Position  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
  

Value Realized  

on Vesting  

  (#)  ($)  

  John McAvoy

  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

    85,842    6,770,359  

  Robert Hoglund

  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

    24,172    1,906,446  

  Timothy P. Cawley

  President, Con Edison of New York

    13,842    1,091,719  

  Elizabeth D. Moore

  Senior Vice President and General Counsel

    15,288    1,205,765  

  Robert Sanchez

  President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

    2,895    228,329  

Footnote:

(1) Represents the vesting of each Named Executive Officer’s performance unit award for the 2014-20162016–2018 performance period, valued at $73.69,$78.87, the closing price of Company Common Stock on February 14, 2017.19, 2019. Actual value realized by each Named Executive Officer will depend on each individual’s payout election under the Company’s long term incentive plan.

 

5254 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  PENSION BENEFITS

 

 

PENSION BENEFITS

 

 

Retirement Plan BenefitsRETIREMENT PLAN BENEFITS

The retirement plan, a tax qualifiedtax-qualified defined benefit retirement plan, covers substantially all of the Company’s employees.employees, including the Named Executive Officers, hired before 2017. The supplemental retirement income plan provides certain highly compensated employees, including the Named Executive Officers, whose benefits are limited by the Internal Revenue Code, with that portion of their retirement benefit that represents the difference between: (i) the amount they would have received under the retirement plan absent Internal Revenue Code limitations on the amount of final average salary that may be considered in calculating pension benefits and the amount of pension benefits payable;limitations; and (ii) the amount actually paid from the retirement plan. All amounts under the supplemental retirement income plan are paid out of the Company’s general assets.

For management employees who participate in the retirement plan and who were hired before January 1, 2001, including Messrs. McAvoy, Cawley, and Cawley, the retirement plan providesSanchez, pension benefits are based on: (i) the participant’s highest average salary for 48 consecutive months within the 120 consecutive months prior to retirement (“final average salary”); (ii) the portion of final average salary in excess of the Social Security taxable wage baseWage Base ($128,400 for 2018) in the year of retirement; and (iii) the participant’s length of service. For purposes of the retirement plan,plan’s final average salary formula, a participant’s salary for a year is deemed to include any award under the Company’s annual incentive plans paid for that year. Participants in the retirement plansplan’s final average salary formula whose age and years of service equal 75, including Messrs. McAvoy, Cawley, and Sanchez, are entitled to an annual pension benefit for life, payable in monthly installments or effective June 1 2017, in a lump sum. Participants may earn increased pension benefits by working additional years. Benefits payable to a participant who retires between ages 55 and 59 with less than 30 years of service are subject to a reduction of one and a half percent (1.5%)1.5% for each full year of retirement before age 60. Early retirement reduction factors are not applied to pensions of participants electing retirement at age 55 or older with at least 30 years of service. Effective January 1, 2013, the portion of future benefits earned and payable at retirement to participants who were under age 50 prior to 2013 and who retire between ages 55 and 59 are subject to an early retirement reduction. The reduction applied to benefits earned after 2012 is five percent (5%)5% for each full year of retirement before age 60. The retirement plan provides

an annual adjustment equal to the lesser of three percent (3%)3% or three-quarters (3/4) of the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index to offset partially the effects of inflation. The retirement plan’s final average salary formula

Fordoes not apply to management employees hired on or after January 1, 2001, including Messrs.Mr. Hoglund and IveyMs. Moore.

For management employees who participate in the retirement plan and who were hired on or after January 1, 2001, including Mr. Hoglund and Ms. Moore, the retirement plan provides pension benefits are based on a cash balance formula under which benefits accrue atthat is expressed as a hypothetical account balance. Under the end ofretirement plan’s cash balance formula, the Company provides each calendar quarter. Benefit distributions are made inparticipant with two allocations: one is based on a participant’s annual compensation (a compensation credit) and the form ofother is based on an immediate or deferred lifetime annuity but participants may also elect a lump sum payment.interest percentage (an interest credit). The creditingcompensation credit percent, which can range from four percent (4%)4% to seven percent (7%),7% depending on the participant’s age and years of service, is applied to the participant’s base salary and annual incentive award (“Earnings”)compensation during the quarter. In addition, a participant whose Earnings exceedcompensation exceeds the Social Security Wage Base ($118,500128,400 for 2016)2018) will receive a four percent (4%)4% credit on the amount of his or her Earningscompensation that exceedexceeds the Social Security Wage Base. TheA participant’s cash balance account of participants is credited withreceives a quarterly interest quarterlycredit at a rate equal toone-quarter (1/4) of the annual interest rate payable on the30-year U.S. Treasury bond, subject to a minimum annual rate of three percent (3%)3% and a maximum annual rate of nine percent (9%)9%. The following table shows how this works:the compensation credit is calculated:

 

Age Plus Years
of Service
Crediting
Rate on
Compensation
PlusCrediting Rate on
Compensation Above
Social Security
Wage Base
  Rate on
Earnings
 Plus Rate on
Earnings Above
Social Security
Wage Base
 (%)+(%)
Under 35   4  44 4
35–49   5  45 4
50–64   6  46 4
Over 64   7  4
Over 64(1)7 4

From June 1, 2017 throughFootnotes:

(1)Applicable for Ms. Moore under the cash balance formula in the retirement plan.

Benefit distributions are made in the form of an immediate or deferred lifetime annuity, although participants may also elect a lump sum payment.

The retirement plan was closed to new management and rehired management employees as of December 31, 2021, management2016. Management employees hired beforeor rehired on or after January 1, 2017, may make an irrevocable election to have future company contributions made toparticipate in the defined contribution pension formula within the savings plan in lieu of the cash balance formula. Supplemental benefits will be provided under the deferred income plan if qualified plan benefits are restricted by Internal Revenue Service limits.plan. Until June 30, 2021, management

 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  5355


LOGOLOGO  PENSION BENEFITS

employees hired between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2016, including Mr. Hoglund and Ms. Moore, may make an irrevocable election to earn future retirement benefits under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan instead of future participation in the retirement plan. Effective January 1, 2018, Mr. Hoglund made an irrevocable election to earn future retirement benefits under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan instead of the retirement plan. The Company continues to provide Mr. Hoglund’s cash

balance account in the retirement plan with interest credits attributable to his account balance prior to January 1, 2018. The defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan provides the same level of Company compensation credits for a participant as the cash balance formula in the retirement plan. However, under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan, participating employees make their own investment elections and are responsible for their own investment results.

 

Pension Benefits TablePENSION BENEFITS TABLE

The following table shows certain pension benefits information for each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2016.2018.

 

Name & Principal Position  Plan Name Number of
Years Credited
Service
  Present Value  of
Accumulated
Benefit(1)
    Payments during
Last Fiscal Year
 (#)($)($)

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

  Retirement Plan

Supplemental Retirement
Income Plan

  

3739

3739


  $

$

1,822,968

14,859,460

 

2,089,780

23,689,466


    $

$

0

0


Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  Retirement Plan
Supplemental Retirement
Income Plan
  

14

19

13

18


(2)

  $

$

307,843

1,750,883

 

347,353

1,878,852


    $

$

0

0


Craig IveyTimothy P. Cawley

President, Con Edison

of New York

  Retirement Plan
Supplemental Retirement
Income Plan
  

732

732


  $

$

166,435

902,965

 

1,643,208

3,736,373


    $

$

0

0


Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and

General Counsel

  Retirement Plan
Supplemental Retirement
Income Plan
  

710

710


  $

$

190,353

576,371

 

252,993

787,446


    $

$

0

0


Timothy P. CawleyRobert Sanchez

President and Chief Executive

Officer, Orange & Rockland

  Retirement Plan
Supplemental Retirement
Income Plan
  

29

29


  $

$

1,439,485

2,335,732

 

1,531,534

1,697,089


    $

$

0

0


Footnotes:

(1) Amounts were calculated as of December 31, 2016,2018, using the assumptions that were used for the Company’s financial statements. (See Note E to the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for material assumptions.)
(2) As part of Mr. Hoglund’s employment offer in 2004, the Company agreed to provide Mr. Hoglund credit forwith an additional ten years of service in the cash balance formula in the retirement plan to offset part of the long-term incentives forfeited upon leaving his previous employer. Five of the additional ten years of service were creditedvested on April 1, 2014 after he completed ten years of continuous employment and the remaining five years will be creditedvested after he completes 15 years of continuous service.service in April 2019. The portion of Mr. Hoglund’s retirement benefit that is attributable to the additional years of service provided by the Company ($666,055626,530 as of December 31, 2016)2018) will be paid under the supplemental retirement income plan.

 

5456 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

 

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

 

Deferred Income PlanDEFERRED INCOME PLAN

The savings plan, atax-qualified savings plan, covers substantially all of the Company’s employees. The savings plan is described on page 44. All management employees, including the Named Executive Officers, whose benefits under thetax-qualified savings plan, described on pages 46 and 47, are limited bysubject to the compensation limit in the Internal Revenue Code, are eligible to deferparticipate in a portion of their salary into the deferred income plan, anon-qualified deferred compensation plan. (The Internal Revenue Code limit for 2018 was $275,000.) The deferred income plan permits participating officersemployees, including the Named Executive Officers, to defer on abefore-tax basis: (i) up to 50% of their base salary; (ii) all or a portion of their annual incentive award; and (iii) the cash value of any restricted stock unit awards (including any dividend equivalents). Deferrals (including any investment returns thereon) are fully vested. In addition, underawards. Under the deferred income plan, the Company will creditcredits participating employees with a Company matching contribution on that portion of their contributions that cannot be matched under thetax-qualified savings plan because of Internal Revenue Code limitations.

Effective as of January 1, 2017 all new management employees, all rehired management employees, and all management employees hired between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2016 who make an irrevocable election to participate in the defined contribution pension formula in thetax-qualified savings plan instead of the retirement plan and whose benefits under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan are subject to the compensation limit in the Internal Revenue Code, are also eligible to participate in the deferred income plan. Effective January 1, 2018, Mr. Hoglund made an irrevocable election to earn future retirement benefits under the defined contribution pension formula in the savings plan instead of the retirement plan.

Earnings on amounts contributed under the deferred income plan reflect investment in accordance with participating employees’ investment elections. Deferrals and any earnings thereon are always 100% vested. Company matchingnon-elective contributions vest

100% three years after a participating employee’s date of hire.

There were no above-market or preferential earnings with respect to the deferred income plan. Individuals participating in the deferred income plan may elect to receive the performance of funds institutionally managed by the Nationwide Insurance Company.funds. Participants may change their investment allocation once per calendar quarter. All amounts distributed from the deferred income plan are paid out of the Company’s general assets.

Amounts deferred if any, under the savings plan and the deferred income plan by the Named Executive Officers are included in the “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 48.50. Company matching contributions andnon-elective contributions under the defined contribution pension formula in the deferred income plan allocated to the Named Executive Officers under the savings plan and the deferred income plan are shown in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 48.50. Amounts realized upon vesting of stock awards that were deferred into the deferred income plan, if any, are shown on the “Value Realized on Vesting” column of the Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table on page 52.54.

 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  5557


LOGOLOGO  NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation TableNON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth certain information with respect tonon-qualified deferred compensation for each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2016.2018.

 

Name & Principal Position  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY(2)
   

Aggregate
Earnings/(Losses)

in Last FY(3)

   

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

   Aggregate
Balance at
Last  FYE(4)
 

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and Chief

Executive Officer

  $737,593   $28,673   $98,147   $0   $1,057,898 

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  $116,164   $27,375   $63,627   $0   $854,770 

Craig Ivey

President, Con Edison

of New York

  $408,298   $31,822   $136,647   $0   $2,186,243 

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President

General Counsel

  $27,441   $20,581   $94,797   $0   $1,650,850 

Timothy P. Cawley

President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland

  $8,642   $4,321   $6,071   $0   $155,238 
Name & Principal Position  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY(1)
  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY(2)
  

Aggregate
Earnings/
(Losses)

in Last
FY(3)

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

  Aggregate
Balance at
Last  FYE(4)
  ($)  ($)  ($) ($)  ($)

John McAvoy

Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

    2,003,766    30,650    (84,588)   0    3,246,397

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

    259,661    118,498    (130,202)   0    1,653,505

Timothy P. Cawley

President, Con Edison of New York

    1,009,071    10,080    (79,822)   0    1,123,118

Elizabeth D. Moore

Senior Vice President and

General Counsel

    29,603    22,202    (190,571)   0    1,766,004

Robert Sanchez

President and Chief Executive Officer,
Orange & Rockland

    9,665    4,833    (1,696)   0    71,698

Footnotes:

(1) Amounts set forth under “Executive Contributions in Last FY” column are reported in either: (i) the “Salary” column of the Summary Compensation Table;Table” on page 50; (ii) the “Value Realized on Vesting” column of the Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table;Table” on page 54; or (iii) the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table of the Company’s proxy statements for its 20162018 and 20172019 annual meetings of stockholders, as applicable.
(2) The amounts set forth under the “Registrant Contributions in Last FY” column are reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 48.50.
(3) Represents earnings or losses on accounts for fiscal year 2016.2018. No amounts set forth under “Aggregate Earnings/(Losses) in Last FY” column have been reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 48,50, as there were no above-market or preferential earnings credited to any Named Executive Officer’s account.
(4) Aggregate account balances in thenon-qualified deferred income plan as of December 31, 2016:2018:

 

  McAvoy   Hoglund   Ivey   Moore   Cawley   McAvoy   Hoglund   Cawley Moore   Sanchez 

Executive Contributions

  $865,830   $386,333   $1,675,900   $1,267,390   $101,838 

Company Matching Contributions

  $92,334   $182,772   $151,666   $102,929   $15,157 
  ($)   ($)   ($) ($)   ($) 

Executive contributions

   2,928,822    947,927    1,119,967   1,325,494    59,133 

Company matching contributions

   152,596    240,552    29,767   146,507    6,770 

Companynon-elective contributions

   —      89,089    —     —      —   

Earnings

  $99,734   $285,665   $358,677   $280,531   $38,243    164,979    375,937    (26,616  294,003    5,795 

Total

  $1,057,898   $854,770   $2,186,243   $1,650,850   $155,238    3,246,397    1,653,505    1,123,118   1,766,004    71,698 

 

5658 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

 

 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

 

The Severance Program for Officers of the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Severance Program”) provides compensation to officers, including the Named Executive Officers, in the event of certain terminations of employment or a change of control of the Company. The amount of compensation that is potentially payable to each Named Executive Officer in each situation is listed in the table. These amounts are estimates only and do not necessarily reflect the actual amounts that would be paid to these Named Executive Officers, which would only be known at the time that they become eligible for payment. The table reflects the amount that could be payable under the Severance Program assuming such termination occurred at December 31, 2016.2018. The price per share of Company Common Stock on December 31, 20162018 was $73.68$76.46 per share.

 

Name & Principal Position  Executive
Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination(1)
  Resignation
for any
Reason
(prior to CIC)
or Resignation
without
Good  Reason
(following a
CIC)
  Retirement Termination
without
Cause(2)
 Termination
for
Cause
  Termination
without Cause
or Resignation
for Good
Reason
(following
a  CIC)(3)
 Death or
Disability
 
 Executive
Benefits and
Payments Upon
Termination(1)
 Resignation
for any
Reason
(prior to CIC)
or Resignation
without
Good Reason
(following a
CIC)
 Retirement Termination
without
Cause(2)
 Termination
for
Cause
 Termination
without Cause
or Resignation
for Good
Reason
(following
a  CIC)(3)
 Death or
Disability
  ($)  ($) ($) ($)  ($) ($) 

John McAvoy

 Severance $0  $0  $4,287,600  $0  $7,043,900  $0   Severance  0   0   4,550,000  0   7,475,000   0 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 

Long-term plan incentives(4)

 $0  $11,147,784(5)  $11,147,784(5)  $0  $11,147,784(5)  $11,147,784(5)   

Long-term plan incentives(4)

  0   11,522,522(5)    11,522,522(5)   0   11,522,522(5)    11,522,522(5)  
Benefits and Perquisites $0  $0  $2,909,481  $0  $5,793,962  $1,225,000  Benefits and Perquisites  0   0   319,855  0   614,710   1,300,000 

Total(6)

 $0  $11,147,784  $18,344,865  $0  $23,985,646  $12,372,784 

Total(6)

  0   11,522,522   16,392,377  0   19,612,232   12,822,522 
Robert Hoglund Severance $0  $0  $1,446,000  $0  $2,530,500  $0   Severance  0   0   1,534,000  0   2,684,500   0 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Long-term plan incentives(4) $0  $3,322,968(5)  $3,322,968(5)  $0  $3,322,968(5)  $3,322,968(5)   Long-term plan incentives(4)  0   2,943,710(5)    2,943,710(5)   0   2,943,710(5)    2,943,710(5)  
Benefits and Perquisites $0  $0  $182,701  $0  $340,401  $723,000  Benefits and Perquisites  0   0   185,043  0   345,085   767,000 

Total(6)

 $0  $3,322,968  $4,951,669  $0  $6,193,869  $4,045,968 

Total(6)

  0   2,943,710   4,662,753  0   5,973,295   3,710,710 

Craig Ivey

 Severance $0  $0  $2,072,900  $0  $3,508,000  $0 

Timothy P. Cawley

  Severance  0   0   1,591,200  0   2,692,800   0 
President, Con Edison of New York Long-term plan incentives(4) $0  $4,582,896(5)  $4,582,896(5)  $0  $4,582,896(5)  $4,582,896(5)   

Long-term plan incentives(4)

  0   2,270,862(5)    2,270,862(5)   0   2,270,862(5)    2,270,862(5)  
Benefits and Perquisites $0  $0  $208,856  $0  $392,712  $797,300  Benefits and Perquisites  0   0   635,582  0   1,246,163   612,000 

Total(6)

 $0  $4,582,896  $6,864,652  $0  $8,483,608  $5,380,196 

Total(6)

  0   2,270,862   4,497,644  0   6,209,825   2,882,862 
Elizabeth D. Moore Severance $0  $0  $1,219,100  $0  $2,133,400  $0   Severance  0   0   1,293,200  0   2,263,100   0 
Senior Vice President and General Counsel Long-term plan incentives(4) $0  $2,099,880(5)  $2,099,880(5)  $0  $2,099,880(5)  $2,099,880(5)   Long-term plan incentives(4)  0   1,865,624(5)    1,865,624(5)   0   1,865,624(5)    1,865,624(5)  
Benefits and Perquisites $0  $0  $152,822  $0  $280,644  $609,500  Benefits and Perquisites  0   0   152,296  0   279,592   646,600 

Total(6)

 $0  $2,099,880  $3,471,802  $0  $4,513,924  $2,709,380 

Total(6)

  0   1,865,624   3,311,120  0   4,408,316   2,512,224 

Timothy P. Cawley

 Severance $0  $0  $1,065,300  $0  $1,802,800  $0 

Robert Sanchez

  Severance  0   0   1,140,400  0   1,929,900   0 
President and Chief Executive Officer, Orange & Rockland Long-term plan incentives(4) $0  $1,900,944(5)  $1,900,944(5)  $0  $1,900,944(5)  $1,900,944(5)   

Long-term plan incentives(4)

  0   1,131,608(5)    1,131,608(5)   0   1,131,608(5)    1,131,608(5)  
Benefits and Perquisites $0  $0  $356,629  $0  $688,257  $409,700  Benefits and Perquisites  0   0   674,867  0   1,324,733   438,600 

Total(6)

 $0  $1,900,944  $3,322,873  $0  $4,392,001  $2,310,644 

Total(6)

  0   1,131,608   2,946,875  0   4,386,241   1,570,208 

Footnotes:

(1) For purposes of the table above, Messrs. McAvoy, Hoglund, Ivey and Cawley, and Ms. Moore, are each defined as the “Executive” in the corresponding footnotes below. Assumes the compensation of Messrs. McAvoy, Hoglund, IveyCawley, and Cawley,Sanchez, and Ms. Moore for 20162018 is as follows: (i) Mr. McAvoy’s base salary equal to $1,225,000$1,300,000 and a target annual bonus equal to 125% of base salary; (ii) Mr. Hoglund’s base salary equal to $723,000$767,000 and a target annual bonus equal to 50% of base salary; (iii) Mr. Ivey’sCawley’s base salary equal to $797,300$612,000 and a target annual bonus equal to 80% of base salary; (iv) Ms. Moore’s base salary equal to $609,500$646,600 and a target annual bonus equal to 50% of base salary; and (v) Mr. Cawley’sSanchez’s base salary equal to $409,700$438,600 and a target annual bonus equal to 80% of base salary. Benefits and perquisites include incrementalnon-qualified retirement plan amounts (supplemental retirement income plan), health care cost coverage, death benefit proceeds (deferred income plan), and outplacement costs. For disclosure of the benefits payable to each Named Executive Officer upon termination of employment under the Company’sCompany’s: (i) qualified andnon-qualified retirement plans, see the Pension Benefits tableTable and related footnotes on page 54,56; and(ii) non-qualified deferred compensation plan (deferred income plan), see theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation tableTable and related footnotes on page 56.58.
(2) As per the Severance Program, the Executive’sNamed Executive Officer’s severance benefit pursuant to a termination without “Cause” (before a Change of Control or “CIC”) is equal to: (i) a lump sum equal to any unpaid base salary and annual target bonuspro-rated prorated through the termination date and any accrued vacation pay,pay; (ii) a lump sum equal to the net present value of one additional year of service credit under the Company’s retirement plans (assuming compensation at Executive’sNamed Executive Officer’s then annual rate of base salary and target annual bonus),; (iii) a lump sum equal to 1x the sum of the Executive’sNamed Executive Officer’s then base salary and target annual bonus,bonus; (iv) one year continuation of health and life insurance coverage and one year of additional service credit toward eligibility for (but not for commencement of) retiree benefits, and (v) one year of outplacement costs.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement57


LOGOPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

(3) As per the Severance Program, the Executive’sNamed Executive Officer’s severance benefit under a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (on or following CIC) is equal to the same severance benefit under a termination without Cause (before CIC) as described in footnote 2(2) except the amounts in clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv) are 2x instead of 1x.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement59


LOGOPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

(4) Potential payments under the long term incentive plan require the occurrence of a (i) CIC and (ii) qualifying termination of employment (a “CIC Separation from Service”) unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise.
(5) For disclosure purposes, the Compensation Committee is assumed to have taken action pursuant to the long term incentive plan to fully accelerate the vesting of target performance unit awards.
(6) The total amounts are in addition toto: (i) vested or accumulated benefits under the Company’s defined benefit pension plans, 401(k) plans, andnon-qualified deferred compensation plans, which are set forth in the compensation disclosure tables; (ii) benefits paid by insurance providers under life and disability insurance policies; and (iii) benefits generally available to all management employees, such as accrued vacation.

 

A description of the assumptions that were used in creating the table for Messrs. McAvoy, Hoglund, Ivey, and Cawley, and Ms. Moore (each defined as the “Executive”)Named Executive Officers is as follows:

Equity AccelerationEQUITY ACCELERATION

Separation from Service

With respect to unvested performance-based equity awards under the long term incentive plan, in the event of a Termination, resignation, retirement,Retirement, death or Disability, the Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the terms of the awards (including, without limitation, to accelerate the vesting of unvested awards). Unless otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, in the event of a retirement,Retirement, death or Disability, performance-based equity awards vestpro-rata prorata through the date of the event.

For the purposes of the long term incentive plan: (i) “Termination” means a resignation or discharge from employment, except death, disabilityDisability or retirement,Retirement; (ii) “retirement”“Retirement” means resignation on or after age 55 with at least five years of service,service; and (iii) “Disability” means an inability to work in any gainful occupation for which the person is reasonably qualified by education, training or experience because of a sickness or injury for which the person is under doctor’s care.

Change in Control

As per the long term incentive plan, in the event of a Change in Control or CIC Separation from Service, as applicable, unvested performance-based equity awards respectively, vestpro-rata, through the date of the Change in Control, assuming targeted performance was achieved.

For purposes of the long term incentive plan, “Change in Control” has the same meaning as “Change of Control” under the Severance Program.

For purposes of the long term incentive plan, a “CIC Separation from Service” means a termination without Cause

or due to a resignation for Good Reason that occurs on or before the second anniversary following the occurrence of a Change in Control.

Cause” means the conviction of the Named Executive Officer of a felony or the entering by the Named Executive Officer of a plea ofnolo contendere to a felony, in either case having a significant adverse effect on the business and affairs of the Company.

Good Reason” occurs if the Named Executive Officer resigns for any of the following reasons: (i) any material decrease in base compensation,compensation; (ii) any material breach by the Company of any material provisions of the long term incentive plan,plan; (iii) a requirement by the Company for the Named Executive Officer to be based at any office or location more than 50 miles from the location the Named Executive Officer is employed prior to the Change in Control,Control; or (iv) the assignment of any duties materially inconsistent in any respect with the Executive’sNamed Executive Officer’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities.

Incremental Retirement AmountsINCREMENTAL RETIREMENT AMOUNTS

As per the Severance Program, the amounts relating to the incremental retirement amounts in the table are based on the net present value of one additional year of service credit under the Company’s retirement plans following a termination without Cause or a resignation for Good Reason (two additional years if such termination is in connection with a Change in Control) assuming compensation at the Executive’sNamed Executive Officer’s annual salary and target award, age 65 normal retirement, and the assumptions used to calculate lump sum benefits under the qualified retirement plan in December 2016.2018.

The assumptions for Messrs. McAvoy, Cawley, and CawleySanchez, include interest rates of 1.47%3.21% for the first five years, 3.34%4.26% for the next 15 years, and 4.30%4.55% thereafter (adjusted to-0.23% 1.48%, 1.61% 2.52% and 2.56%2.80%, respectively, to reflect cost of living adjustments) and theRP-2000 mortality table projected for 20162018 (50% male/50% female blend).

58CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

The assumptions for Messrs. Hoglund’s and Ivey’s and Ms. Moore’s retirement amount are in accordance with the “cash balance” formula.formula in the retirement plan and the defined contribution formula within the savings plan for Mr. Hoglund. All amounts payable pursuant to an incrementalnon-qualified retirement plan are assumed to be paid as a lump sum.

60CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

Termination without Cause or a Resignation for Good ReasonTERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE OR A RESIGNATION FOR GOOD REASON

As per the Severance Program, the Named Executive Officer will receive certain benefits as described in the table if he or she is terminated by the Company for reasons other than Cause or he or she resigns for Good Reason (following a Change of Control). A termination is for Cause if it is for any of the following reasons: (i) willful and continued failure to substantially perform his or her duties,duties; (ii) a conviction of a felony or entering a plea ofnolo contendere to a felony that has a significant adverse effect on the business of the Company,Company; or (iii) a willful engaging in illegal conduct or in gross misconduct materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company.

As per the Severance Program, a resignation for Good Reason occurs if the Named Executive Officer resigns for any of the following reasons on or following a Change of Control: (i) any material decrease in base compensation (except uniform decreases affecting similarly situated employees),; (ii) any material breach by the Company of any material provisions of the Severance Program,Program; (iii) a requirement by the Company for the Named Executive Officer to be based more than 50 miles from the location the Named Executive Officer is employed prior to the Change of Control,Control; or (iv) the assignment of any duties materially inconsistent in any respect with the Executive’sNamed Executive Officer’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities.

Payments upon Termination of Employment in Connection with a Change of ControlPAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT IN CONNECTION WITH A CHANGE OF CONTROL

As per the Severance Program, the Named Executive Officer will receive certain benefits as described in the table if his or her termination of employment is without Cause by the Company or he or she resigns for Good Reason following a Change of Control.

SectionSECTION 280G ReductionREDUCTION

As per the Severance Program, in the event ana Named Executive Officer receives any payment or distribution from the Company in connection with a Change of Control, he or she may be subject to certain excise taxes pursuant to Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. If any such payment or distribution subjects the Named Executive Officer to such taxes and the Named Executive Officer would receive a greater netafter-tax amount if the payment were reduced to avoid such taxation, the aggregate present value of amounts payable to the Named Executive Officer pursuant to the Severance Program will be reduced (but not below zero) to the extent it does not trigger taxation under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Death BenefitDEATH BENEFIT

As per the Company’s Deferred Income Plan, participating officers, including the Named Executive isOfficers, are entitled to a death benefit equal to his or hertheir individual base salary. The benefits are payable in a lump sum.

 

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  5961


LOGOLOGOCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT AND COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) for 2018 with management of the Company. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and this Proxy Statement.

Management Development and Compensation Committee:

George Campbell, Jr. (Chair)

John F. Killian

William J. Mulrow

Michael W. Ranger

L. Frederick Sutherland

COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT

In 2018, the Compensation Committee asked Mercer to undertake a risk assessment of the Company’s compensation programs to determine whether the Company’s compensation policies and practices for employees, generally, would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s risk management and create incentives that could lead to excessive or inappropriate risk taking by employees. The Compensation Committee also asked management to review the assessment. Based on Mercer’s risk assessment findings, with which the Compensation Committee and management concur, the Company’s compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s risk management or create incentives that could lead to excessive or inappropriate risk taking by employees.

Among the relevant features of the Company’s compensation programs that mitigate risk are:

a recoupment policy applicable to all Company officers with respect to incentive-based compensation;

annual and long-term incentives under the Company’s compensation programs appropriately balanced between annual and long-term financial performance goals that are expected to enhance stockholder value;

annual and long-term incentives tied to multiple performance goals to reduce undue weight on any one goal;

non-financial performance factors used in determining the actual payout of annual incentive compensation as a counterbalance to financial performance goals;

compensation programs designed to deliver a significant portion of compensation in the form of long-term incentives, discouraging excessive focus on annual results;

performance-based equity awards based on performance over a three-year period, focusing on sustainable performance over a three-year cycle rather than any one year;

annual and long-term incentive awards that are subject to appropriate payment caps and Compensation Committee discretion to reduce payouts; and

share ownership guidelines that further the long-term interests of executives and stockholders, and restrictions on shorting, hedging, and pledging Company securities.

62CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOPAY RATIO AND CERTAIN INFORMATION AS TO INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

PAY RATIO

The Company is required by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules to disclose the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company (excluding the Chief Executive Officer), the annual total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, and the ratio of these two amounts (the “pay ratio”). The pay ratio below is a reasonable estimate based on the Company’s payroll records and the methodology described below, and was calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules. Because SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported below, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

As permitted by SEC rules, the Company’s median employee for 2018 is the employee identified in 2017. The employee is based in New York and is represented by a collective bargaining unit. The Company has determined that there have been no changes in its employee population or employee compensation arrangements during the last completed fiscal year that would significantly impact the pay ratio disclosure for 2018. As of December 1, 2018, the Company’s entire workforce (excluding

the Chief Executive Officer), consisted of 15,324 full andpart-time employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. On December 1, 2017, this number was 15,603. In identifiying the median employee last year, the Company used earnings as reported on Internal Revenue Service FormW-2 for 2017, annualized the compensation of all employees hired during 2017, and did not make any cost of living adjustments.

For 2018, the annual total compensation of the Company’s median employee, as calculated using Summary Compensation Table requirements, was $106,453 and the annual total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, as disclosed in the column “Securities and Exchange Commission Total” in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 50, was $9,765,858. The resulting pay ratio of the Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of the Company’s median employee was 92 to 1.

Subtracting the change in pension value from the median employee’s annual total compensation, as was done for the Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation and shown in the column “Securities and Exchange Commission Total Without Change in Pension Value” in the “Summary Compensation Table,” the pay ratio of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to the Company’s median employee would be 70 to 1.

CERTAIN INFORMATION AS TO INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

No stockholder action is required with respect to the following information that is included to fulfill the requirements of Section 726 of the Business Corporation Law of the State of New York.

Effective December 2, 2018, the Company purchased Directors and Officers (“D&O”) Liability insurance for aone-year term providing for reimbursement, with certain exclusions and deductions, to: (i) the Company and its subsidiaries for payments they make to indemnify Directors, Trustees, officers and assistant officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, (ii) Directors, Trustees, officers, and assistant officers for losses, costs and expenses incurred by them in actions brought against them in connection with their acts in those capacities for which they are not indemnified by the Company or its subsidiaries, and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries for any payments they make resulting from a securities claim. The insurers are: Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited, Axis Insurance Company, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance, Continental Casualty Company, Endurance American Insurance Company,

Federal Insurance Company, Illinois National Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, X.L. Insurance (Bermuda) Ltd., XL Specialty Insurance Company and Zurich American Insurance Company. The total cost of the D&O Liability insurance for one year from December 2, 2018 amounts to $2,845,718. The Company also purchased from Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited, Arch Insurance Company, Axis Insurance Company, Great American Insurance Company, Illinois National Insurance Company, RLI Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company and Zurich American Insurance Company, additional insurance coverage for one year effective January 1, 2019, insuring the Directors, Trustees, officers, assistant officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and certain other parties against certain liabilities which could arise in connection with fiduciary obligations mandated by ERISA and from the administration of the employee benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries. The cost of such coverage was $765,692.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement63


LOGO  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

 

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

 

PROXY MATERIALS

 

What Are The Proxy Materials?

The Proxy Materials include the following:

 

The Proxy Statement.

 

The Annual Report to Stockholders of the Company, which includes the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, and other information relating to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

If you received the Proxy Materials by mail, they also include a proxy card or a voter instruction form for use at the 20172019 Annual Meeting.

Why Am I Receiving The Proxy Materials?

The Proxy Materials are provided to stockholders of the Company on or about April 3, 2017,8, 2019, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company for use at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement. The Proxy Materials include information that we are required to provide to you under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are providing the Proxy Materials to our stockholders by mail,e-mail, or in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “Notice and Access” rule.

Why Did I Receive The Proxy Materials In The Mail?

We are providing some of our stockholders, including stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the Proxy Materials, with paper copies of the Proxy Materials. You may also access the Proxy Materials and vote online at the Internet address provided on the proxy card or the voter instruction form. If you do not want to receive paper copies of proxy materials on an ongoing basis, please follow the instructions for Internet voting on your proxy card or voter instruction form.

Why Did I ReceiveE-Mail Delivery Of The Proxy Materials?

We are providinge-mail delivery of the Proxy Materials to those stockholders who have previously elected electronic delivery. Those stockholders should have received ane-mail containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website.

Why Did I Receive A Notice Of Internet Availability Of Proxy Materials?

To reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting, we are providing the Proxy Materials over the Internet. As a result, we are sending many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) instead of a paper copy of the Proxy Materials. All stockholders receiving the Notice of Internet Availability may access the Proxy Materials over the Internet and request a paper copy of the Proxy Materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the Proxy Materials over the Internet, to vote online, and to request a paper copy may be found in the Notice of Internet Availability. In addition, the Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how you may request delivery of proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis.

Can I Request A Paper Copy Of The Proxy Statement And Annual Report?

The Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available on our website atconedison.com/shareholdershareholderss..A copy of these materials is also available without charge upon written request to the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal executive office at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003.

I Share An Address With Another Stockholder, And We Received Only One Copy Of The Proxy Materials. How May I Obtain An Additional Copy?

We have adopted a procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission called “householding.” Under this procedure, registered holders of Company Common Stock who have the same address and last name and who receive either a Notice of Internet Availability or a paper copy of the Proxy Materials in the mail, will receive only one copy of the Proxy Materials, or a single envelope containing the Notice of Internet Availability, for all stockholders at that address. This consolidated method of delivery will continue unless we are notified from a stockholder at that address that individual copies are preferred. Householding allows us to realize significant cost savings and reduces the amount of duplicate information stockholders receive.

If you are a registered holder of Company Common Stock and wish to discontinue householding, please notify Computershare, may deliver only one copy of the Proxy Materials or Notice of Internet Availability to multiple stockholders who share an address unless Computershare has received contrary instructions.Company’s Transfer Agent and Registrar, by calling1-800-522-5522.

 

 

6064 CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

 

If you hold yourare a beneficial holder of Company Common Stock who holds Company Common Stock through a broker, bank, or other financial institution (“broker”), your broker may deliver only one copy of the Proxy Materials or Notice of Internet Availabilityand wish to multiple stockholders who share an address unless contrary instructions are received. If you would like to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Materials or Notice of Internet Availability, or if you would like to receive separate copies for future meetings,discontinue householding, please submit a request to Broadridge Householding Department by telephone at1-866-540-7095 or by mail at 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, and your requested material(s) will be delivered promptly. If you currently receive separate copies of these materials and wish to receive a single copy in the future, please contact your broker.11717.

Who Pays The Cost Of Soliciting Proxies For The Annual Meeting?

The Company will pay the expenses associated with the solicitation of proxies. The solicitation of proxies is being made by mail, telephone, the Internet, electronic transmission, or overnight delivery. The expense associated with the solicitation of proxies will include reimbursement for postage and clerical expenses to brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding Proxy Materials and other documents to beneficial owners of stock held in their names. Morrow Sodali LLC (“Morrow”), 470 West Avenue, Stamford, CT 06902, has been retained to assist in the solicitation of proxies. The estimated cost of Morrow’s services is $22,000plus distribution costs and other costs and expenses.

VOTING AND RELATED MATTERS

What Is The Record Date?

The Board of Directors has established March 21, 201725, 2019 as the record date for the determination of the Company’s stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

How Many Votes Do I Have?

You are entitled to one vote on each proposal presented at the Annual Meeting for each outstanding share of Company Common Stock you owned on the record date.

How Many Votes Can Be Cast By All Stockholders Entitled To Vote At The Annual Meeting?

One vote on each proposal presented at the Annual Meeting for each of the 305,274,517326,946,537 shares of Company Common Stock that were outstanding on the record date.

How Many Votes Must Be Present To Hold The Annual Meeting?

To constitute a quorum to transact business at the Annual Meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present in person or by proxy. We urge you to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, so that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present to hold the meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted in the determination of the quorum.

How Do I Vote?

You can vote whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. Stockholders have a choice of voting over the Internet, by telephone, by mail using a proxy card or voter instruction form, or in person at the Annual Meeting.

 

If you received a printed copy of the Proxy Materials, please follow the instructions on your proxy card or voter instruction form. Your proxy card or voter instruction form provides information on how to vote over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail.

 

If you received a Notice of Internet Availability, please follow the instructions on the notice. The Notice of Internet Availability provides information on how to vote over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail.

 

If you received ane-mail notification, please click on the link provided in thee-mail notification, and follow the instructions on how to vote over the Internet or by telephone.

 

If you are a registered holder of the Company’s Common Stock, you may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

To help us reduce the environmental impact of our meeting, we ask that you vote through the Internet or by telephone, both of which are available 24 hours a day. To ensure that your vote is counted, please remember to submit your vote by the date and time indicated on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voter instruction form, as applicable.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement61


LOGOQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

If My Shares Are Held By My Broker, Can My Shares Be Voted If I Don’t Instruct My Broker?

The Securities and Exchange Commission has approved a New York Stock Exchange rule that affects the manner in which your broker may vote your shares. Your broker may not vote on your behalf for the election of directors or compensation-related matters unless you provide specific voting instructions to your broker. For your vote to be counted, you need to communicate your voting decisions to your broker, in the manner prescribed by your broker, before the date of the Annual Meeting.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement65


LOGOQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

If you have any questions about this rule or the proxy voting process in general, please contact the broker where you hold your shares. The Securities and Exchange Commission also has a website (www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters.shtml) with more information about your rights as a stockholder.

If I Am A Registered Holder Of Company Common Stock, What If I Don’t Vote For One Or More Of The Matters Listed On My Proxy Card?

All shares represented by properly executed proxies received in time for the Annual Meeting will be voted at the Annual Meeting in the manner specified by the persons giving those proxies. If you return a signed proxy without indicating voting instructions your shares will be voted as follows:

 

 

for the election of the ten Director nominees;

 

 

for the ratification of the appointment of independent accountants; and

 

 

for the advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation; and

for the advisory vote (1 Year) on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

Can I Revoke My Proxy Or Change My Vote?

Yes, depending on how your shares of Company Common Stock are held, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote by sending in a new, properly executed proxy card or voter instruction form with a later date, or by casting a new vote by Internet or telephone, or by sending a properly executed written notice of revocation to the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal executive office at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003. Check the instructions on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voter instruction form for information

regarding your specific revocation options. If you are a registered holder of Company Common Stock, you may also change your vote by appearing at the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting without voting will not by itself revoke a proxy.

ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

What Is The Location, Date, And Time Of The Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held at the Company’s principal executive office at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003, on Monday, May 15, 2017,20, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.

Where Can I Find Directions To The Annual Meeting?

Directions to the Annual Meeting are available on our website atconedison.com/shareholders.

Who Can Attend The Annual Meeting?

Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to holders of Company Common Stock on March 21, 2017,25, 2019, the record date, the authorized representative (one only) of an absent stockholder, and invited guests of management.

Do I Need A Ticket To Attend The Annual Meeting?

Yes, you will need an admission ticket and proof of ownership of Company Common Stock on the record date to enter the meeting.

 

If you received a printed copy of the Proxy Materials and you are a registered holder of Company Common Stock, your proxy card serves as your admission ticket to the Annual Meeting.

 

If you received a printed copy of the Proxy Materials and you hold your shares through a broker or through an employee plan, please bring to the Annual Meeting a copy of a brokerage or other statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date.

 

If you received a Notice of Internet Availability, that Notice of Internet Availability serves as your admission ticket to the Annual Meeting.

 

If you received ane-mail notification, please access the Proxy Materials by clicking on the link provided in thethee-maile-mail notification and follow the instructions for downloading a copy of your admission ticket.

62CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

If you hold your shares through a broker, you can expedite your admission to the Annual Meeting by registering in advance and printing your admission ticket by visitingwww.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided (you will need the 16 digit number included on your proxy card, voter instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability).

You may be asked to present valid picture identification to gain entrance to the Annual Meeting. Any person claiming to be an authorized representative of a stockholder must, upon request, produce written evidence of the authorization.

Are There Any Special Attendance Procedures?

In order to assure the holding of a fair and orderly meeting and to accommodate as many stockholders as possible who may wish to speak at the Annual Meeting, management will limit the general discussion portion of the meeting and permit only stockholders or their authorized representatives to address the meeting. No signs, banners, placards, handouts, cameras, recording equipment, nor similar items may be brought to the meeting room. Many cellular phones havebuilt-in digital cameras, and, while these phones may be brought into the Annual Meeting, the camera function may not be used at any time. Recording of the Annual Meeting is prohibited. Suitcases, briefcases, packages, and other items may be subject to inspection.

 

 

66CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement63


LOGOCERTAIN INFORMATION AS TO INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

CERTAIN INFORMATION AS TO INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

No stockholder action is required with respect to the following information that is included to fulfill the requirements of Section 726 of the Business Corporation Law of the State of New York.

Effective December 2, 2016, the Company purchased Directors and Officers (“D&O”) Liability insurance for aone-year term providing for reimbursement, with certain exclusions and deductions, to: (a) the Company and its subsidiaries for payments they make to indemnify Directors, Trustees, officers and assistant officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, (b) Directors, Trustees, officers, and assistant officers for losses, costs and expenses incurred by them in actions brought against them in connection with their acts in those capacities for which they are not indemnified by the Company or its subsidiaries, and (c) the Company and its subsidiaries for any payments they make resulting from a securities claim. The insurers are: Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited, Arch Insurance Company, Axis Insurance Company, Berkley Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Company,

Endurance American Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, Illinois National Insurance Company, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, X.L. Insurance (Bermuda) Ltd., XL Specialty Insurance Company and Zurich American Insurance Company. The total cost of the D&O Liability insurance for one year from December 2, 2016 amounts to $3,295,197. The Company also purchased from Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited, Arch Insurance Company, Axis Insurance Company, Great American Insurance Company, Illinois National Insurance Company, RLI Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company and Zurich American Insurance Company, additional insurance coverage for one year effective January 1, 2017, insuring the Directors, Trustees, officers, assistant officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and certain other parties against certain liabilities which could arise in connection with fiduciary obligations mandated by ERISA and from the administration of the employee benefit plans of the Company and its subsidiaries. The cost of such coverage was $776,457.

64CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. –Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO  STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING AND OTHER MATTERS

 

 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING

 

 

PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN 20182020 PROXY STATEMENT

In order to be included in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to the Company’s 20182020 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholder proposals must be received by the Company at its principal executive office at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003, Attention: Vice President and Corporate Secretary, by the close of business on December 4, 2017.10, 2019.

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR INCLUSION IN 20182020 PROXY STATEMENT (PROXY ACCESS)

Pursuant to the Company’sBy-laws, a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) who has owned at least three percent (3%) of the Company’s shares for at least three years and has complied with the other requirements set forth in theBy-laws may request that the Company include director nominees (up to the greater of two nominees or twenty

percent (20%) of the Board) for election in the Company’s 20182020 Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to the Company’s 20182020 annual meeting of stockholders. The nominations must include the information specified inthe By-laws and must be received by the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company at its principal executive office no earlier than November 4, 201710, 2019 and no later than December 4, 2017.10, 2019.

OTHER PROPOSALS OR NOMINATIONS TO COME BEFORE THE 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING

Under the Company’sBy-laws, written notice of any proposal to be presented by any stockholder or any other person to be nominated by any stockholder for election as a Director must include the information specified inthe By-laws and must be received by the Vice President and Corporate Secretary of the Company at its principal executive office no earlier than January 15, 201821, 2020 and no later than February 14, 2018.20, 2020.

 

 

 

OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING

 

Management intends to bring before the meeting only the election of Directors (Proposal No. 1) and Proposals No. 2 3, and 4,3 and knows of no matters to come before the meeting other than the matters set forth herein. If other matters or motions come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote such proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters or motions, including any matters dealing with the conduct of the meeting.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGOLOGO

Jeanmarie SchielerSylvia V. Dooley

Vice President and Corporate Secretary

Dated: April 3, 20178, 2019

 

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.–Proxy Statement  6567


LOGO

Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., EDT, on Monday, May 15, 2017.

Vote by Internet

• Go towww.investorvote.com/ED

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•  Call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone.

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in

this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

 A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, and 1 YEAR
on Proposal 4.

1. Election of DirectorsForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
    01 - Vincent A. Calarco06 - John McAvoyForAgainstAbstain
    02 - George Campbell, Jr07 - Armando J. Olivera2.Ratification of appointment of independent accountants.
    03 - Michael J. Del Giudice08 - Michael W. Ranger3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.
    04 - Ellen V. Futter09 - Linda S. Sanford

4.

Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

1 Year

2 Years

3 Years

Abstain

    05 - John F. Killian10 - L. Frederick Sutherland

 B Non-Voting Items
Change of Address — Please print your new address below.Comments — Please print your comments below.Meeting Attendance
Mark the box to the
right if you plan to
attend the Annual
Meeting of
Stockholders.

 C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

01—George Campbell, Jr. 02—Ellen V. Futter 03—John F. Killian 06—Armando J. Olivera 07—Michael W. Ranger 08—Linda S. Sanford For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 1 U P X 04—John McAvoy 09—Deirdre Stanley 05—William J. Mulrow 10—L. Frederick Sutherland Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 02ZUVE + + Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed, A and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 2. Ratification of appointment of independent accountants. 3. Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. 1. Election of Directors: For Against Abstain Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Full title of one signing in representative capacity should be clearly designated after signature. Names of all joint holders should be written even if signed by only one.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. B Authorized SignaturesPlease print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
      /      /

                        021NWC


2017 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket

2017 Annual Meeting of

Consolidated Edison, Inc. Stockholders

Monday, May 15, 2017, 10:00 a.m. EDT

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

4 Irving Place, New York, NY 10003

This ticket admits only the named stockholder(s).

Please bring this admission ticketsection must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and a proper form of identification with you if attending the Annual Meeting of

Stockholders.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, please promptly vote

by telephone, through the Internet or by completing and returning the attached proxy card.

Voting early will not prevent you from voting in person at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders if you wish to do so.

Your proxy is revocable in accordance with the procedures set forth in the proxy statement.

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,Sign Below qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.ENVELOPE.q Consolidated Edison, Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders Proxy Card For Against Abstain 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ 1234 5678 9012 345 MMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 4 0 3 1 4 3 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND C 1234567890 J N T C123456789 MMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMM 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext If no electronic voting, delete QR code and control # Δ â‰^ You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Online Go to www.investorvote.com/ED or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.investorvote.com/ED. Phone Call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada. Votes submitted online or by phone must be received by 1:00 a.m., EDT, on Monday, May 20, 2019. Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!


LOGO

LOGO

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

4 Irving Place

New York, NY 10003

Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.investorvote.com/ED qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.qNon-Voting Items + + Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

COMMON STOCK

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Vincent A. Calarco,John F. Killian, John McAvoy and Michael J. Del Giudice and John McAvoyW. Ranger and each or any of them with power of substitution, proxies to vote all stock of the undersigned (including any shares held through the Company’s Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Payment Plan) at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Monday, May 15, 201720, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. at the Company’s Headquarters, 4 Irving Place, New York, NY, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof, as specified on the reverse side in the election of Directors and on the proposals, all as more fully set forth in the proxy statement, and in their discretion on any matters that may properly come before the meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Your vote for the election of Directors may be indicated on the reverse side. Nominees are: 01 - Vincent A. Calarco, 02 - 01—George Campbell, Jr., 03 - Michael J. Del Giudice, 04 - 02—Ellen V. Futter, 05 - 03—John F. Killian, 06 - 04—John McAvoy, 07 - 05—William J. Mulrow, 06—Armando J. Olivera,08 -Michael 07—Michael W. Ranger, 09 - 08—Linda S. Sanford, 09—Deirdre Stanley, and 10 - 10—L. Frederick Sutherland.

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE, BUT IF NO CHOICE IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED ABOVE (PROPOSAL 1), AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND “1 YEAR” ON PROPOSAL 4.

(Items3. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)


LOGO

Vote by Internet

• Go towww.investorvote.com/ED

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability 2019 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket 2019 Annual Meeting of Proxy Materials for the

Consolidated Edison, Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on Monday, May 15, 2017

Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, you are receiving this Notice that the proxy materials for the20, 2019, 10:00 a.m. EDT Consolidated Edison, Inc. annual meeting of stockholders are available on the Internet. Follow the instructions below to view the materials and vote online or request a copy. The items to be voted on and location of the annual meeting of stockholders are on the reverse side. Your vote is important!

This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. The Consolidated Edison, Inc. proxy materials are available at:

LOGO

Easy Online Access — A Convenient Way to View Proxy Materials and Vote

When you go online to view materials, you can also vote your shares.

Step 1:Go towww.investorvote.com/ED.

Step 2:Click on the icon on the right to view current meeting materials.

Step 3:Return to the investorvote.com window and follow the instructions on the screen to log in.

Step 4:Make your selection as instructed on each screen to select delivery preferences and vote.

When you go online, you can also help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery of future materials.

Obtaining a Copy of the Proxy Materials - If you want to receive a copy of these documents, you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a copy. Please make your request for a copy as instructed on the reverse side on or before Friday, May 5, 2017 to facilitate timely delivery.

02INYC


LOGO

Consolidated Edison, Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Monday, May 15, 2017 at Consolidated Edison, Inc., 4 Irving Place, New York, NY 10003 at 10:00 a.m. EDT.

Proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders are listed below along with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, and 1 YEAR on Proposal 4:

1.Election of Directors -

1. Vincent A. Calarco

2. George Campbell, Jr.

3. Michael J. Del Giudice

4. Ellen V. Futter

5. John F. Killian

6. John McAvoy

7. Armando J. Olivera

8. Michael W. Ranger

9. Linda S. Sanford

10. L. Frederick Sutherland

2.Ratification of appointment of independent accountants.
3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.
4.Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

PLEASE NOTE - YOU CANNOT VOTE BY RETURNING THIS NOTICE. To vote your shares you must vote online or request a paper copy of the proxy materials to receive a proxy card. If you wish to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, please bring this notice with you.

Directions to the Consolidated Edison, Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders are available in the proxy statement which can be viewed at www.investorvote.com/ED.

THIS NOTICE IS YOUR ADMISSION TICKET TO

THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

  Here’s how to order a copy of the proxy materials and select a future delivery preference:

Paper copies: Current and future paper delivery requests can be submitted via the telephone, Internet or email options below.

Email copies: Current and future email delivery requests must be submitted via the Internet following the instructions below. If you request an email copy of current materials you will receive an email with a link to the materials.

PLEASE NOTE: You must use the number in the shaded bar on the reverse side when requesting a set of proxy materials.

Internet - Go towww.investorvote.com/ED. Follow the instructions to log in and order a copy of the current meeting materials and submit your preference for email or paper delivery of future meeting materials.

Telephone - Call us free of charge at1-866-641-4276 and follow the instructions to log in and order a paper copy of the materials by mail for the current meeting. You can also submit a preference to receive a paper copy for future meetings.

Email - Send email toinvestorvote@computershare.com with “Proxy Materials Consolidated Edison, Inc.” in the subject line. Include in the message your full name and address, plus the number located in the shaded bar on the reverse side, and state in the email that you want a paper copy of current meeting materials. You can also state your preference to receive a paper copy for future meetings.

To facilitate timely delivery, all requests for a paper copy of the proxy materials must be received by Friday, May 5, 2017.

02INYC


CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING FOR HOLDERS AS OF 3/21/17

TO BE HELD ON 5/15/17

Your vote is important. Thank you for voting.

Read the Proxy Statement and have the voting instruction form below at hand. Please note that telephone and Internet voting turns off at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time the night before the meeting or cutoff date.

Vote by Internet:         www.proxyvote.com

Vote by Phone:            1-800-454-8683

Vote by Mail:                 Use the envelope enclosed

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:E22716-P84808

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The following materials are available at www.proxyvote.com: Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all of the nominees listed (Proposal 1):
1.Election of Directors:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.Vincent A. Calarco
1b.George Campbell, Jr.
1c.Michael J. Del Giudice
1d.Ellen V. Futter
1e.John F. Killian
1f.John McAvoy
1g.Armando J. Olivera
1h.Michael W. Ranger
1i.Linda S. Sanford
1j.L. Frederick Sutherland

PLEASE “X” HERE ONLY IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING AND VOTE THESE SHARES IN PERSON

TheBoardofDirectorsrecommendsavote FOR Proposals 2 and 3:ForAgainstAbstain
2.Ratification of appointment of independent accountants.
3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.
TheBoardofDirectorsrecommendsavote of 1 YEAR on Proposal 4:1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
4.Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date


*** Exercise YourRightto Vote ***

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on Monday, May 15, 2017.

Meeting Information
CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

Meeting Type:         Annual Meeting of Stockholders

For holders as of:    March 21, 2017

Date:    May 15, 2017       Time:   10:00 AM

Location:4 Irving Place
New York, NY 10003

You are receiving this communication because you hold shares in the company named above.

This is not a ballot. You cannot use this notice to vote these shares. This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. You may view the proxy materials online atwww.proxyvote.comor easily request a paper copy (see reverse side).
LOGO

We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.

See the reverse side of this notice to obtain proxy materials and voting instructions.


Before You Vote

How to Access the Proxy Materials

Proxy Materials Available to VIEW or RECEIVE:

NOTICE AND PROXY STATEMENT                 ANNUAL REPORT            

How to View Online:

Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrowLOGO (located on the following page) and visit:www.proxyvote.com.

How to Request and Receive a PAPER orE-MAIL Copy:

If you want to receive a paper ore-mail copy of these documents, you must request one. There is NO charge for requesting a copy. Please choose one of the following methods to make your request:

                    1) BY  INTERNET:

  www.proxyvote.com

                    2) BY TELEPHONE:  1-800-579-1639
                    3) BY E-MAIL*:  sendmaterial@proxyvote.com

*  If requesting materials bye-mail, please send a blanke-mail with the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrowLOGO (located on the following page) in the subject line.

Requests, instructions and other inquiries sent to thise-mail address will NOT be forwarded to your investment advisor. Please make the request as instructed above on or before Monday, May 1, 2017 to facilitate timely delivery.

How To Vote

Please Choose One of the Following Voting Methods

Vote By Internet: To vote now by Internet, go towww.proxyvote.com. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrowLOGO available and follow the instructions.

LOGO

Vote By Mail:You can vote by mail by requesting a paper copy of the materials, which will include a voting instruction form.

VoteInPerson:If you choose to vote these shares in person at the meeting, you must request a “legal proxy.” To do so, please follow the instructions atwww.proxyvote.com or request a paper copy of the materials, which will contain the appropriate instructions. Many annual meetings of stockholders have attendance requirements including, but not limited to, the possession of an attendance ticket issued by the entity holding the meeting. Please check the meeting materials for any special requirements for meeting attendance.THIS NOTICE WILL SERVE AS AN ADMISSION TICKET.


Voting Items

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR

all of the nominees listed (Proposal 1):

1.    Election of Directors:

       1a.

Vincent A. Calarco

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3:

       1b.

George Campbell, Jr.

2.Ratification of appointment of independent accountants.

       1c.

Michael J. Del Giudice

3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.

       1d.

Ellen V. Futter

The Board of Directors recommends a vote of1 YEAR on Proposal 4:

       1e.

John F. Killian

4.Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

       1f.

John McAvoy

       1g.

Armando J. Olivera

       1h.

Michael W. Ranger

       1i.

Linda S. Sanford

       1j.

L. Frederick Sutherland

Voting Instructions

LOGO


LOGO

Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., EDT, on Monday, May 15, 2017.

Vote by Internet

• Go towww.investorvote.com/EDESP

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•  Call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories
& Canada on a touch tone telephone.

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

LOGO

LOGO

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

AProposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, and 1 YEAR
on Proposal 4.

1. Election of DirectorsForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
    01 - Vincent A. Calarco06 - John McAvoyForAgainstAbstain
    02 - George Campbell, Jr07 - Armando J. Olivera2.Ratification of appointment of independent accountants.
    03 - Michael J. Del Giudice08 - Michael W. Ranger3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.
    04 - Ellen V. Futter09 - Linda S. Sanford

4.

Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

1 Year

2 Years

3 Years

Abstain

    05 - John F. Killian10 - L. Frederick Sutherland

BNon-Voting Items
Change of Address — Please print your new address below.Comments — Please print your comments below.Meeting Attendance
Mark the box to the
right if you plan to
attend the Annual
Meeting of
Stockholders.

CAuthorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Full title of one signing in representative capacity should be clearly designated after signature. Names of all joint holders should be written even if signed by only one.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

      /      /

                                 02INZC


2017 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket

2017 Annual Meeting of

Consolidated Edison, Inc. Stockholders

Monday, May 15, 2017, 10:00 a.m. EDT

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

4 Irving Place, New York, NY 10003

This ticket admits only the named stockholder(s).

Please bring this admission ticket and a proper form of identification with you if attending the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

Please Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, please promptly vote promptly by telephone, through the Internet or by completing and returning the attached proxy card.

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

LOGO

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

4 Irving Place

New York, NY 10003

CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

TO COMPUTERSHARE AS PLAN AGENT

FOR THE CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (STOCK PURCHASE PLAN)

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, MAY 15, 2017

I hereby instruct Computershare, the Plan Agent for the Stock Purchase Plan, to vote (in Voting early will not prevent you from voting in person or by proxy) all of the shares of common stock of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the Company), which are credited to my account under the Stock Purchase Plan, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders ofif you wish to do so. Your proxy is revocable in accordance with the Company to be held on Monday, May 15, 2017, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof on the following matters, all as more fullyprocedures set forth in the proxy statement, as checked on the reverse side, and in its discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof. This form provides Voting Instructions for shares held in the Stock Purchase Plan. If signed, dated and returned, the shares of common stock of the Company represented by the Voting Instructions will be voted in accordance with the specifications given.

(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)


LOGO

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

4 IRVING PLACE - ROOM 16-205

NEW YORK, NY 10003

ATTN: JEANMARIE SCHIELER

VOTING IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.

Vote by Internet, phone or mail. Follow the instructions below.

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit these Voting Instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 10, 2017. Have this Voting Instruction form in hand when accessing the website and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use anytouch-tonestatement. telephone to transmit these Voting Instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 10, 2017. Have this Voting Instruction form in hand when calling and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date this Voting Instruction form and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, by Wednesday, May 10, 2017. Do not vote by mail if Voting Instructions were previously transmitted by Internet or phone.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E18778-TBD             KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR

all of the nominees listed (Proposal 1):

1.Election of Directors:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.Vincent A. Calarco
1b.George Campbell, Jr.
1c.Michael J. Del Giudice
1d.Ellen V. Futter
1e.John F. Killian
1f.John McAvoy
1g.Armando J. Olivera
1h.Michael W. Ranger
1i.Linda S. Sanford
1j.L. Frederick Sutherland

TheBoardofDirectorsrecommendsa

voteFOR Proposals 2 and 3:

ForAgainstAbstain
2.Ratification of appointment of independent accountants.
3.Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation.
TheBoardofDirectorsrecommendsa vote of 1 YEAR on Proposal 4:1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
4.Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

Please sign exactly as the name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date

V.1.1


LOGO

ADMISSION TICKET

Annual Meeting of Stockholders of

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

MONDAY, MAY 15, 2017 10:00 a.m.

4 Irving Place

New York, NY 10003

This ticket admits only the named stockholder(s). Please bring this admission ticket and a

proper form of identification with you if attending the meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

E18779-TBD

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — —

CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

To Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company as Trustee under the Consolidated Edison Thrift

Savings Plan (Thrift Savings Plan) and the Con Edison Tax Reduction Act Stock Ownership

Plan (TRASOP Plan)

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Monday, May 15, 2017

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, the Trustee of the Thrift Savings Plan and TRASOP Plan (together, the Plans), is instructed to vote (in person or by proxy) all of the shares of common stock of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the Company), which are credited to the account under the Plans, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on Monday, May 15, 2017, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, for the matters listed on the reverse side, all as more fully set forth in the proxy statement, as checked on reverse side, and in its discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. This form provides voting instructions for shares held in the Plans. If signed, dated and returned, the shares of common stock of the Company represented by these Voting Instructions will be voted in accordance with the specifications given.

If shares are held in the Plans and these Voting Instructions are not returned to the Trustee by Wednesday, May 10, 2017, the shares will be voted in the same manner and proportions as those shares for which the Trustee has received instructions. If these Voting Instructions are signed, dated and returned with no preference indicated, the shares will be voted on each proposal as recommended by the Board of Directors.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

V.1.1